PC 82-210r'°~.~
~~
I
`I! RESOLUTION NO. PC82-210
'.'' A RESOLUTIpN OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLAAINING CUMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 82-83-4 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from ALBERT BORCHARp & KEI~7ETH L. LARSON, 5915
Burchard Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90034; and ROY W. MABEE, 2651 West
~ Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801, owners, and GFELLER DEVELOPMENT
; CoMPANY, INC., 228 West Main Street, Tustin, California 92680, p.~; gpg
!~ REESE, agent of certain real property situat~d in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
.; I
THE SOUTH 815 . 0 0 FEET OF THE EAST HAI,F OF THE WEST HALF OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SSCTION
12, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS
COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON A MAp 12ECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXC~PTING THEREFROM TAE EAgT 15.00 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO ERCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET, AS DESCRIgED
IN DEED TO TFTE STATE OF CAI,IFORNIA RECORDED MARCH 5, 1966
IN BOOK 3424, PAGE 186 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY.
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 12,
TOW~7SHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECpgIjED
IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCELI.ANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTX, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 12,
SAID POINT HEING LOCATED 648.71 FEET NORTH 89 DEGREES 41'
10" EAST FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAZD SECT20N 22, SAID
I'~INT BF.ING ON THE y,7EST LINE OF THE EAST 15.00 FEET OF THE
EAST ONE-HALF OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTIiWEST
ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 12;
THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 10' 49" WEST 815.00 FEET ALONG THE
SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 15.00 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE
PARAI+LEL WITH AND 815.00 FEET NURTHERLY FROM THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 41' 10" WEST
316.93 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEI, LINE TO A PQINT ZN THE WEST
LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE
SO[JTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUAI2TER OF SAID
SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 11' 10" WEST 513.23 FEET
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST ONE-HALF OF THE WEST
OrR-FiALg TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF THE SAID SOUTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 12;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 41' 20" EAST G61.98 FEET AI,ONG SAID
NORTH LINE TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 330.00
FEE..' OF THE EAST ONE-HAi,g OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SEC'TION 12; THENCE SOUTH
0 DEGREES 10' 49" GpST 1328.23 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
THE SAID WEST 330.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID SECTION 12; THEL3CE SOUR'I3 89 DEGREES 41' ZO" WEST
345.00 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
#0353I
4i~'
PC82-210
~
,,, !-.
EXCEPT THE SOUTh 40.00 FEET OF THE EAST 345.00 FF:ET THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cornmission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 26, 1982 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and co:isider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to inveatigate and make findings and recommendations in cor.nection
therewith; said public hearing having been continued to the Planning
Coamiission meeting of November 29, 1982; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
property from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family), CL (Coaunercial,
Limited) and RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) to the RM-1000
(Residential, Multiple-Family) 2one.
2. That on December 8, 1981, the City Council approved General Plan
Amendment No. i70 which amended the Land Use Element text of the Anaheim
General Plan to permit higher density residential land uses (i.e. those
exceeding 36 dwelling units per acre) in the "downtown" area and other areas
having adequate infrastructure and meeting certain specific conditions as
identified in the zoning ordinance. Such high density areas are intended to
be compatible with surrounding land uses. In addition, the Council adopted an
"RM-1000" Zoae ordinance which permits up to 43.56 dwellings per acre to
implement the General Plan Amendment. The ordinance is intended to provide
site development standards for condominium projects in specific cases and
under certain conditions 'i.p. the subject progerty, Lincoln-Beach Mobilehome
Park which was developed on land previously used as a landfi.ll site) and to
allow a density exceeding what is permitted under the City's standard
condominium zone (RM-3000). The subject condominium project has a net density
of 32.6 dwelling units per acre, in conformance with the General Plan and
2oning Requirements.
3• That the proposed reclassification of subject property is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the
community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established throughout the community. •
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires
the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That approxiatately 60 interested persons indicated their
presence at said public hearing; and that no correspondence was received in
opposition to subject petition.
' -2- PC82-21U
•
~~y`'ii; , .. .~ , .,..
,-,,
i~
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That after conside~ing EIR No. 253 for
the proposed Park Lincoln Condominium Project and reviewing evidence, both
written and oral, to supplement Draft EIR No. 253, the Planning Commission
finds that:
(1) EIR No. 253 is in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act and the City and State CEQA Guideline~.
(2) The following environmental impacts would result from implementation
of the project.
(a) After construction the increase in population would generate
higher levels of traffic, noise and air pollut•ion in the area.
(b) There would be additional burden on par}: and recreational
facilities in the vicinity of the project.
(c) The residents of approximately 120 mobilehomes would be
displaced.
(d) The removal of refuse buried on the project site will generate
traffic, noise and air pollution in the project area.
(e) Disposal of the refuse will add to the existing burden on
regional sanitary landEills.
(3) The following mitigation measures will be employed to reduce the
level of these environmental impacts.
(a) Compliance with City codes, policies and procedures.
(b) The project sponsor will subatit a propo~al for providing in-lieu
fees or recreational facilities subject to approval by the City.
(c) Displaced residents of the mobilehome park will be provided
relocation assistance or right on units in the residential
condominium project.
(d) The project sponsor will prepare and submit for City approval a
Trash Removal Plan which will include specific procedures for
the removal and disposal of the buried refuse.
Therefore, the Planning Commission hereby certifies that EIR No. 253
for Lhe proposed Park Linco2n Conciominium Project has been completed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and with the City and
State CEQA Guidelines and that the Planning Commission has reviewed and
c~nsidered the information contained i.n the subject EIR.
Further, the Plar.ning Commission adopts the following Statement of
Overriding Considerations.
.-~ ~~.
Significant environmental impacts listed above would result from
implementation of the project. The mitigation measures listed above will be
utilized to reduce the environmental impacts, however, the nature of the
impacts will prevent their reducr=.on to an insignificant level.
The following benefits which would result from the project provide
overriding considerations for approval.
(a) Present residents of the mobilehome park will receive relocation
assistance or rights on units in the condominium project thereby
improving their living conditions.
(b) The buried refuse un the site will be excavated and removed
thereby eliminating a potential source of air and water
pollution.
(c) Approximately 639 additional units of moderate-cost housing
would be conatructed providing social and economic benefits to
the community.
(d) Redevelopment of the project site will preclude the possible
need for government action at some future date to close the
mobilehome park if necessitated for reasons of health and safety
and displacing mobilehome park residents without providing
alternative solutions for their hottsing needs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheiat Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described property from the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Family), CL (Commercial, Limited) and RS-A-43,000 (Residential,
Agricultural) Zones to the RM-1000 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone upon
the following conditions which are hereby Eound to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of subject property in or3er to preserve the safety and
general we].Eare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That street lighting facilities along Lincoln Avenue shall be
installed as required by the Office of Utilities General Manager, and
in accordance with specifications on file in the Office of the Office
of Utilities General Manager and/or that security in the form of a
bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit or cash, in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the satisfactory installation of the
above-mentioned improvements. Said security shall be posted with the
City prior to approval of the final tract map. The:•above-required
imp.rovements shall be installed prior to occupancy
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim a fee, in an amount as determzned by the City Council, for
tree planting purposes along Lincoln Avenue.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the Office of che Executive Director of
Public Works.
-4- PC82-210
~ :.. . , , _
_
,~ , . .,,_ . .. . _ ... _.
.,,....
~
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior
to commencement of structural framing.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
7. That in the event that subject property is to be divided for the
purpose of sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map shall be approved
by the City of Anaheim and be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder. The approval of a parcel map, or the issuance of
building permits to allow the construction of said project in more
than one phase of development, shall be subject to the completion of
trash removal for the area covered by said phase of development in
accordance with the approved Trash Removal Plan.
8. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the
building permit is issued. Alternatively, the owner may construct
improvements at City parks. Such improvements shall be made only if
approved by the Park~ and Recreation Department.
9. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 122 for private streets,
including installation of street name signs. Plans for the private
street lighting, as required by the standard detail, shall be
submitted to the Building Division for approval and inclusion with
the building plans prior to issuance of building permits. (Private
streets are those which provide primary access and/or circulation
within the project.)
1Q. That if permanent street name signs have not been installed,
temporary street name signs shall be installed prior to any
occupancy. '
11. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896), in an amount as determtned by
the City Council, for each new dwelling unit prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
12. That an offsite storm drain to the Carbon Creek Flood Control
Channel, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be constructed and
operational prior to the start of any grading of Area 3 unless
previously required by the City Engineer as a re3ult of material
found in the grading of Area 2.
13. That the offsite sanitary sewer shall be constructed and functional
prior to any occupancy of Area 2 unless required by the City
Engineer at an earlier time.
i
~,! 14. That no on-site drainaqe shall be permitted to flow onto Lincoln
1 A~~enue .
~
~ _5_ P~82_21~
:1
.._ _..
,,w7~.,~...:..~ ._... . _ _ . _ ~,a:;~.
~, ~ _-.
15. That the design of on-site drainage structures shall be approved by
the City Enqineer prior to the starY, of any grading on sutject site.
16. That a separate qrading plan shall be prepared and approved by the
City Engineer for eacli construction phase and an As Graded Plan
shall be prepared, certified, an3 approved for each phase prior to
start of grading on the next phase or at stich other later times as
may be authorized hy the City Engineer.
17. That the seller shall provide the purchaser of each condominium unit
with written information concerning Anaheim Municipal Code 14.32.500
pertaining to "parking restricted to facilitate street sweeping."
Such written information will clearly indicate when on-street
parking is prohibited and the penalty for violation.
18. That "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs shall be installed prior
to final street inspection as required by the Public Works Executive
Director in accordance with specifications on file with the Street
Maintenance Division.
19. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Office
of Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the City of Anaheim
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
20. That the median island modification in Linco.ln Avenue shall be
completed prior to any occupancy in Phase 1.
21. That a co~prehensive on-site vehicular access and parking plan
which, unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer, shows
tandeat parking along only o:se side of each driveway aisle shall be
submitted by the developer/owner for review and approval by the City
Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits.
22. That a detailed Trash Removal Plan shall be submitted by the
developer/owner for review and approval by the City and other
concerned public agencies prior to approval of grading plans ar
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for any area
or phase of such development upon which said landfill currently
exists.
23. That a tentative tract map shall be submitted for revlew and
approval by Planning Commission.
"24.(a) That the owner(s) of the subject property sha].1 pay to each
mobilehome owner as identified in the conversion ia~act
report relocation benefits in the respective amounts as set
forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorpc~rated herein
by this reference, or such other benefits as mutually aqreed
upon between the park owner and the mobilehome owner. Said
relocation benefits shall be paid to each mobilehome owner,
and proof thereof submitted to City in a form satisfactory
to the City Attoraey, prior to the issuance of any building
permit for any phase or portion of the proposed development
other than these portions identified as Phase 1 and Phase 2
as shown on the Phasing Plan, Sheet 4, Revtsion ho. 1 of
plans on file in the Planning Department of the City of
Anaheim, or prior to July 1, 1985, whichever occurs first.
'~- PC82-210
1~'=~- _ _ ,
F ~ /~~•
(b) That notwithstanding subparagraph (a) above, any mobilehome
owner who relocates from the park at any time after the date
of issuance of grading permits fox any phase of the
developnent shall be paid said relocation benefits
contemporaneous with the termina•tior_ of each tenancy
provided, however, that such advance payments pursuant to
this subparagraph (b) need not be made at any time in
advance of the date otherwise set forth in subparagraph (a)
to more than ten percent o£ such mobilehome owners.
(c) That the amount of said relocation benEfits payable to each
mobilehome owner pursuant to subparagra:, (a) or (b) above,
shall be increased by an amount equal to any increase in the
Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers, All Items, Los Angeles-Long Beach Metropolitan Area
(1967=100), published b,y the United States Department of
Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistic~ ("Index"), which is
publishe3 nearest to the date of this resolution as compared
to the Index most recently published prior to the date of
payment of said relocation benefits.
(d) That the owner of the subject property shall post a
performance bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the
City Attorney to guarantee the payment of said relocation
benefits.
25. That prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that
the proposed project is in conformance with Council Policy No. 542,
Sound Attenuation in Residential Projects.
26 That prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that
the units wi21 be fn conforaance ;aith .;ofse Insulation Standards
specified in the California Administrative Code, Title 25.
27. That the owner(s) of subject property shall suhmit a letter
requesting termination of Variance Nos. 631 and 639, and Conditional
Use Permit No. 95 and 1008 to the Planning Department.
28. That completion of these reclassi£ication proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 3306.
29. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Revision No. 2 of Exhibit Nos. 1 through 8.
30. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. 2 and 27, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall
become null and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said
conditions are complied with witnin one year from the date hereof, or
such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
31. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, 6, 14 and 29, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspectiona.
-7- PC82-210
t~.::, .._< . . .. . . .
_ ,?t'". _
;,:-..~
~~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expresaly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgement of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 29th day
of November, 1982.
~ ./J~~ ~ir1~7'~~%fi"'~
, AHEIM CITY P ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~'~ ,~.° ~,_ .
SECRETARY, 11NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAI,IFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY O&' ANAHEIM ?
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a ffeeting of the Anaheim C3ty Planning Commission held on November
29, 1982, by the following vote of the membars thereof:
AYFS: CJMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BCiSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE,
MC BURNEY
NOES : COP4+IISSIONfiRS : NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
TN WITNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 29th day of
November, 1982.
~~.~. .z° ~.~:
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CZTY PLANNING COMMISSSON
-8-
PC82-210
., i
r~
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED TENANT RELOCAPION BENEFITS
RECLASSZFICATION NO. 82-83-4
SPACE NUMBER APPROXIMATE NO. OF
YRS IN YARK SINGLE OR
DOUBLE WIDE TOTAL PROPOSED
PAYMENT
1 g
D
~5
453
Z
3 10 S (EkPANDO) ,
3,914
4 16 D 5,472
5 ~ D 4.979
6 $ S (EXPANnO) 3,866
~ 12 D
5,402
B 5
15 D 4,644
9 S (EXPANDO) 4,287
10 5 S (EXPANDO) 4,450
11 7
4 D
5,466
12
~ S 4,411
13
16 D 5,084
14
13 D 5,370
15
10 D 4,946
16
1 D 5,321
j7
14 S 4,134
18
gipTy D 4,674
19
20
6
S ~
4.194
~y O
21
22 6 D
5,296
23 3
4 D 3,954
24
4 S 2.927
25
14 D 5.272
26
2Q D 5,068
2~
4 ~
5,455
28
4 D 5,374
29
16 D 3.186
30
13 D 5,919
31
10 D 5,168
32
4-1/2 S
D 3,949
33
16 3,872
34
13 D 7,025
35
13 D 5,069
36
4 D 4,969
37
10 D 5,285
38
4 D 6,280
39
4 D 4,783
40
5 D 4,621
41
B D .3,859
42
10 D 4,742
43
16 ~ 5,382
D A,784
#0233H
1 of 3
s;_; PC f3 2 -210
,. . . •
~~ti~^,:~~-~ ..:~,+~.,~ _.,,, _
4a 8
45 8 D 5,608
46 z D 5,044
47 16 D 5,944
48 5 D 5,617
49 12 S 3.864
50 4 D 5.122
51 1~ S 4,687
52 4 S 3,366
~4 EMpTy D 4,780
3 0
55 14 D 5,189
~~Y S 5,776
57 5 0
58 16 S 3,935
59 13 D 5,014
61 16 S (EXPANDO) 4,514
~
63 5 S (EXPANDO) 3,y87
64 5 D 5,150
65 5 S 4,330
`'~ 13 A 4, 879
67 10 D 5,511
68 5 D 5,054
69 4 D 5,144
1
71 8 S (FXPANDO) 3~642
72 13 D 3,664
73 5 D 4.800
74 10 D 3,839
75 5 D 4r924
76 14 D 4,802
~~ 13 D 4,802
~$ 10 D 4,802
79 5 D 4,554
80 10 S 3,817
81 10 D 4,289
82 5 D 3,664
84 EMpTy D 3,i80
14 0
85 5 D 5.25I
86 10 D 5,460
87 15 D 4,194
88 10 D 4,928
g9 4 D 5,306
4,872
.;:,.` , , 2 of 3
PC82-210
i;n':::
tii~ s.,:: .
~carr,~.,.~>,-F
,---~ .~»,,
90 4 D 4,902
91 15 D 5,078
92 4 D 5,653
93 3 S 4,283
94 3 D 4,922
95 3 D 4,737
96 10 D 5,022
97 13 D 5,235
98 10 D 4,402
99 13 D 4,945
100 10 S 4,400
101 10 S 3,120
102 16 D 5,930
103 13 D 4,012
104 10 D 4,794
105 8 D 4,970
106 10 D 5,001
107 10 D 4,554
108 8 S (EXPANDO) 2,907
109 13 D 4,709
110 4 S 4,281
111 4 D 4,207
112 13 D 4,983
113 8 D 4,732
114 16 D 5,514
115 16 S (EXPANDO) 4,832
116 EMPTY p
].17 EMPTY p
118 6 MONTHS D 5,546
119 14 S (EXPANDQ) 3,838
120 8 MONTHS D 4,679
121 12 D 5,242
122 14 S (EXPANDO) 4,382
123 4 D 4,090
12~ 16 S 3,903
125 4 D 5,222
TOTAL PAYMENTS $560,909
~;'i
3 of 3
PC81-210