PC 82-219RESOLUTION NO. PC82-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIP7G COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITZONAL USG PERMIT NO. 2397 BE GRANTED
?4HEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from CONTINENTAL PACIFIC ENTERPRISES,
INC., 1426 North Burton Place, Anaheim, California 92806, ATTN: AL RATTAN,
owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of Ca.lifornia, described as:
PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, AS PEP. MAP FILED IN BOOK 12C, PAGES
25 AND 26 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on November 29, at 1:30 p.m., notice of
said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Munici.pal Code, Chapter 18.03,
ta hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said public hearing having been continued to the Planning
Commission meeting of December 23, 1982; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts;
1• That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use perm3t is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.170 to
wit: to permit a hospital and medical office complex in the CL(SC)
(Commercial. Limited (Scenic Carridor Over2ay}j Zone.
2• T'hat the proposed use is granted subject to petitioner's
stipulation at the ~~ublic hearing that prior to commencement of the hospital
use, the developer, as the c,wner of the adjacent 2.2 acre parcel (Parcel 4),
shall execute and record a covenant as to Parcel 4, in a form approved by the
City Attorney's office, agreeing that, prior to the application for, or
issuance of, any building permits for any commercial development on said
Parcel 4, the owner of said Parcel 4 shall obtain approval from the Planning
Commi.ssion or Cit•y Council of said commercial development with its associated
vehicular traffic impacts, both individua2 and cumulative.
3• That the petitioner also stipulated: (a) That prior to th:
issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay for a traffic signal
inner-connection (in an amount ~f not less than $40,680) in addition to
regular traffic signal assessment fees; (b) That prior to final building anfl
zoning inspactions the developer shall construct a deceleration lane on Noh1
Ranch Road, 200 feet long and 12 feet wide with tire busters at the southern
throat, and that construction shall be done in a manner to preclude left-turns
from west bound traffic on Nohl Ranch Road; (c) That prinr to final building
and zoning inspections, the 3ncline of the service vehicle road shall not
exceed 2B per 40 feet from the back of the side walk on Anaheim Hills Roac
#03752
PC82-219
~•,.
"; i that visibility clearance from both driveways on Anaheim Hills Road shall be
''..,~ provided for a distance of 120 feet northerly and 80 feet southerly, 7 feet
;:•~ back from the sidewalk ar crosswalk; and (d) That prior to Einal zoning
~ inspections, handicapped parkinq spaces shall be provided confo.rming to the
~'`'i latest California and Federal Code, with said spaces to be a nunimum of 12
•,:,~~ feet wide with not less than A feet 2 inches height clearance, and with 4-foot
~V1,, ramps along the side having access to the building without wheelchairs
-' transversing or entering the travel lanes.
§:;. ;
~7i.:
; 4. That• the petitioner stipulated that when ambnlancea turn onto
'~;' Anaheim Hills Road they will shut off their sirens.
=: 5• That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
~ land uses and the qrowth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
6. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of tha proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7• That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions iaposed, if any, will n~t be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
8• That the traffic generated by the propo~ed use will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
9. That two persons indicated their presence at said public hearinq
jn ~pposition; and Uiat no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
~IRONMENTAL II~ACT FINDING: That Environmental Impact Report No.
254 was previously certified by the City Council on November 29, lgg2,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Peraiit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1• That prior to commencement of the use herein approved or issuance of
a building permit whichever occurs first, the developer, as owner of
the adjacent 2.2 acre parcel (Parcel 4), shall execute and record a
covenant as to Parcel 4, in a form approved by the City Attorney's
offiae, agreeing that, prior to the application for, or issuance of,
any building permits for any cummercial development on said Parcel 4,
the owner of said Parcel 4 shall obtain approval from the Planning
Commiasiort ~r City Council oE said commercial development with its
associated vehicelar traffic impacts, both individugl and cumulative.
-2- PC82-219
~ ~,.
2. That prior to the issuance of building permits, and in addition to
payment of regular trafPic signal assessment fee~, the developer
shall pay for a traffic signal inner-connection in an amount of not
less than ~40,680.
3• That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the developer
shall construct a deceleration lane on Nohl Ranch Road, 200 feet long
and 12 feet wide with tire busters at the southern throat, and that
construction shall be done in a manner to preclude left-turns from
west bound traffic on Nohl Ranch Road.
4• That the incline of the service vehicle road shall not exceed 28 per
40 feet from the back of the siue walk on Anaheim Hills Road, and
that the visibility clearance from both driveways on Anaheim Hills
Road shall be provided for a distance of 120 Peet northerly and 80
feet southerly, 7 feet back from the sidewalk or crosswalk.
5. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the handicapped
parking spaces shall be provided conforming to the latest California
and Federal Code, with said spaces to be a minimum of 12 feet wide
with not less than 8 feet 2 inches height clearance, and with 4-foot
ramps along the side having access to the building without wheel
chairs transversing or entering the travel lanes.
6• That trash storage areas shall be provided i,Z accozdance with
approved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of
Public Work~.
~. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charge3 as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Depart~tent prior
to commencement of structural framing.
~• That s~ject property shall be served by underqround utilities.
9• That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896), in an amount as determined by
the City Council, for commercial buildings prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
11. That appropriate water assessment fees as deterau.ned by the Office of
Utiliti~_•s General Ma:~ager shall be paid to the Citiy of Anaheim prior
to thz issuance of a building permit.
12. That the location and design of all vehicular ingress and egress
driveways shall be subject to rhe review and approval of the City
Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of bui2ding permits.
13. That a pedestrian access plan shall be submitted by the developer to
the City Traffic Engir.eer for review und approval prior to the
iasuance of building perm,;.ts.
14. That the desiqn and development of any public street improvementa
shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer prior to
the issuance of building permi*s.
-3- PC82-219
15. That the owner!s) of aubject property shall obtain from the City
vehicular access :rights to N~hl Ranch Road.
16. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 through 10.
17. That Condition No. 15, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to the commencement of the activit~~ authorized under this resolution,
or prior to the time that the bui.lding permit is issuc3, or within a
period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such
further time as the Planning Commis~ion may grant.
18. That Condition Nos. 4, 6, 8, 9, and 16, abo•-e-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicanr_'s compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and •-oid.
THE FOREGOING RESOL~TION is signed and approved by me this 13th day
of December, 1982.
i
CHA RMAN, AN7AH IM CITY ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_1~_1~~~~~..~"c~ ~G~l' .~/1/l ~' ~~
SECRETARY PRO TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CIT1 PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Pamela Starnes, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Coauaission,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Decemb~.r 13, 1982, by
the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIQNERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, KING, I,H CLAII2E
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITN~SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th 3ay of
December, 1982.
~; ~G%~i~~GGC~ _~1/~/yl'~~
SECRETARY PRO TEMPOI'.E
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~' -4- PC62-219
~a~;,, . _
.yy,,yy~,„~~~`~1
~%AYRG~iF~v:Kr1.5r~rF\ F...M'. ..~;~.i... .. . ' ~.. .. ~ .~........, w.•.'..r++Mmnw .w...~r.......~,