PC 82-23~~; }~:~ ;.. .
r,FSn~uTi ~rt r~n, rc82-2.3
A RESOLUTI011 QF TIf[ IIIIAIIEIM f,ITY PLA~I~Iitlf CQN111SSIOPI
Tfll1T PETITIQFI FOR RECLASSIfiC/1TIO~J I10. G1-82-14 uE GRhNTED.
WFIERF./15, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from PAUL T. SALATl1, 295~ Airo-~ay Avenue Suite D-
3, Costa Hesa, f,alifornia ~262(,, aaner, and TUP,P,I~1F F, (3R1'rlK, Attention: RoberT.
E. [3rink, 1~20 East 17th Street Suite 200, Santi Ana, f,alifornia 9?7n1, agent,
of certain real property. The land referrec! to in this ~olicy is situated in the
State of California, County of Oran9e, City of Anaheim and is described as
fol loo~s:
TIIE IlQRTiIEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1F THE F:OP,TtIEAST
QUARTER AtJD TtfE SOUTIiEAST nUARTER OF THE t1flRTfl[AST QUARTER OF TIIE
MORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTIOFI 22, TOUPlSHIP 1~ SOUTN, P,At1GE 11 SJEST
Itl TNE P,ANCf10 LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN OPl /1 MAP R[C(1RDED I"~ (IOOY, 51,
PAGE 11 OF ~11SCELLAME~US ~IAPS, P.[CQRDS OF 11RAtlGE C(1UPITY,
CALIFORNIA.
4lIIERE~S, the City Plannin9 Commission did holci a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on February 22, 1~182, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required hy lao-J and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Plunicipal CoJe, Chapter 18.(13, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and nake
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
1JIIEREAS, saicf Commission, after d~ie inspection, investigation and study made
by itseif and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and detr.rmine the followin~ facts:
follows:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property ~s
Portion /1 from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agriculturai) 7..one ta the RH-
3000 (Residentiai, ~tultiple-Fanily) Zone, and
Portion B from the Rs-n-h3,~'1n0 (Residentiii/Agricultural) Zane to the CO
(Commercial, Office and Professional) 7.one.
2 The Anaheim ~eneral Plan designates subject property for medium density
residential land uses on Portion A and for cortmercial, professional land uses on
Portion D.
3. That the proposed reclassification of su6.ject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
~~. That the proposed reclassification o` subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proxlmity
to subject property and to Che zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
PCFi2-23
-~ , _
5. That the p mposed reclassificati~n c+f subjPCt pro~erty re~uires the
improverzent of abuttin~ streets in acc~rdince with the Circulation Element of T.he
General Plan, due to the anticipated increasn in traffic which ~~ill be generated by
the intensification of land use.
G. That six rersons indicated their presence at said pubiic hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was re~eive~l in opposition to the subject
petition.
Ef1VIROPIMEtJTAL IMP~CT FltlDlflG: [nvironmental Impact Report ~lo. 247 was
previously c~rtified by the City Council on !lecember ', 1931, in conj~~nction alith the
approval of Gener~~l f lan Amencirtwnt tdo, 1(~.. No furthe~ action is necessary at this
time.
N04l, TIiEREFORE, [3E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim ~ity Pianning Commission
does hereby grant suhject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
1~-Zoning of the Anaheim Ptunicipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RS-~-~F3,~00 (Residential/Agricultural) 7_one to the RM-3000
(Residential, Multiple-Family) lone Portion A, and RS-A-43,!10~
(Residential/Agricultural) 7one to CO (Conmerci;al, Office and Professional) 7one
Portion G upon the foilrn~ing conditions aihich are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of sut.ject pro~crty in order tn preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the f,ity of ~nahnim:
1, That street li~hting facilities along t:nott Street shall be installed as
required by the Office of Utilities General Manager, and in accordance arith
specifications on file in the Office of Utilities ~eneral Ptanager; and/or
that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City
to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirerients prior to
accupancy.
2. That trash storaqe are~s shall he provirled in accnrdance with apnroved nlan;
on file with the ~Jffice of the Executive Director of Public IJorks.
3. That fire hydrants shail be installed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of
structural f raming.
b. That subject propPrty shall be served by underground utilities.
5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City [ngineer.
6. In the event that subjec't property is to be divided for the purpose of sale,
lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of
subject property shall be suhmitted to and appraved by the City of Anaheim
and then be recorded in the office of the Orange f.ounty Recorder.
7. That the a•mi~r of subject pr~rerty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
a~propriate par•{; and recreation in-lieu fecs as determined to be appropriate
by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
-?- Pc82-23
That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of
'(.ingst•~ay Avenue and ttyra Avenue suh_ject to the approval of the City
[ngineer.
9. That the existing structures on Portion F3, the commercial site, shall be
brought up to the minimum standards of the C.ity of Anaheim, includtng the
Uniform Quilding, Plumhing, Electrical, 1lechanical and Fire Codes as adopted
by the C i ty of /lnahe i m.
10. That ali ~rivate streets shall be developed in accordance with the City of
Maheim's Standard Detail tlo. 122 for private streets, including
instaliation of street name sic~ns. Plans for the private street lighting,
as required 6y the standard detaii, shall be submitted to the Fiutldir,g
Division for approval and inclusion a~ith the building plans prior to the
issuance of building permits. (Private streets are those which provide
pririary atcess and/~r circulation ~•rithin the ~r~ject.
11. That the owner(s) of subject rro~erty sl~all pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Qrdinance !do. 3~~f) in an amount as determined by the City
Council, for Portion A~ the residenti-1 site, prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
12. That the oamer(s} o' subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance tlo. 3~96) in an amount as determined by the City
Council, for Portion f3, the commercial site, prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
13. That development of suhject property is contingent upon submittal of
specific plans indicating conforrrance to all site development standards of
the RM-300~ (residential, multiple-family) Zone For Portion A and the CO
(commercial, office and professional) Zone for PortTon B. Said plans sha11
be submitted con.junctively with a tentative tract map, prior to issuance of
a building permit or prior to introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
pro,erty, whichever occurs first. ~tty deviance fron ~ode staZdards shstl be
considered in a public heariny in conjunction with an approrriate zoning
petition.
14. Prior to iss~.fance of building permits for any residential buildings, the
applicant shall present evidenr.e satisfactory to the C~iief Duilding
Inspector that the units wtll be in conformance a,ith tJoise Insulation
Standards specified in the California Administrative Code, Titie 25.
15. Prior to issuance of building permits fior any residential buildings, the
applicant shali present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building
Inspector that the proposed pra_ject is in conformance with Council Policy
Flumber 51t2, Sound /lttenuation in Residentiai Pro_jects.
1G. That a 6-foot high masonry ~•~ail shall be constructed along the north, west
and south property lines of Portion /1, the residential site; and along the
:i~st and south property lines o` Portion ES, the commerciai site and such
portions of the nortli Froperty line as ahut residentiat zoning.
17. That appropriate notice be provided to all fuCure buyers and tenants that the
property is subject to the sight~ sound, and over-flight by aircraft utilizin;
Armed Forces Reserve Center, los Alamitos.
-3- PC82-23
,,. .:~~,:,,: ,.: .,.. -- _
.. _ _..
~.;:,.:._ .., , :
~_.
1£3. That al 1 struct.,res shal 1 confnrm tn the he..;~ht cri teria contained in
Federal /ldministrative Regulations ~art 77. Cvidence oi` said compliance
shall be submitted ~rior to issuanc~ of a buildinc~ ~ermit.
19. That the proposed project shall not rmit excessive gl..re ~r light, nor
produce steam, smnke, dust, or electronic interference so as to endanger
aeronautical operations.
20. That an Aviation Easement over the property be grant?d to the Armed forces
Reserve Centcr, Los Alariitos.
21. Prior to the introduction of an ordirtiance rezoning either portion of subject
property, Condition Ilos. 1, 6, and 20, ahove-Mentioned, shali be completed.
The provisions or rights c~~•anted by this resolution shall becorr,e null and
void by action of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are
complied with wi'-hin one year from the date hereof, or such further time as
the Planning Corn~°ssion may grant.
22. That Condition IJos. 2, h, 5, 8, 9, and 16, . above-mentioned, shall be
complied witli prior to final building and zonin9 inspections.
QE IT FURTt1ER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pianning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's coMpliance r~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part there~f, be deciared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TtiE FORECoItJG RESOLUTIO~I is signed and approved by me this 22nd day of
February, 1982,
ATTEST•
~ ~..~~ll ~. ~w.~.,...~
CHAIR ,Atl, AtlAIIEIM CITY PLA1l~dING CQMMISSION
~ D .
SECRETAR ~ ANAfiEIN CITY,P rlpt~l-IG CG~1H1551011
STATE OF CALIFOR~JIA }
COUPJTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CI1'Y OF l1NAFIEIM )
1, Edith L. flarris, Secretary of the Anahelm City Plannin,y Commicsion, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutiun was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City f'ianning i.ommission held on February 22, 1~~12, by the follovrfng vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMD1155IOtlERS: ~:ARN[5, f30U/1S, BUSIIOR[, FRY~ IiERBST, I:It~G, MC DUP,~lFY
NOES: C011MISSIOt~ERS: tJ01JE
ABSEtlT: COMttIS510tiERS: pIO~IE
IM VITNESS b111ERE0F, I have hereunto se[ my hand this 22nd day of ~ebruary~
1~82.
~ ~~:a~ ~
S[CRETARY~ ANAfIEIM CITY PL/1HMING COMMISSION
-~~- rc8z-23