PC 82-31/~~~
Rr•Sr1UITInR1 MQ, Prg~_3~
A RES~LUTI0~1 ~F T~iE ArIAHEI"" CITY FLA~InIINr Cn~~~+ISStnni
THAT PETITIO~I =~4 RECLASSIFICATI~N N~, 4~-u2-~3 r?F r,rt/;nirc~.
WHF~FAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission dtd receive a verifled
petttion for Reclassification from E?~.•/IPI H. !J, qh)~ IdFR~ P. KFn~T~~.~~ ~no~ Ino
Obrero Avenue, P.O, Sox 5-73~, ~uadalajara, JAL, Mexico and Oranae County, Flood
Control Dtstrict, c/o Countv of Orange Environmental Manaqement Agencv, Division
of Requlatton, P.O. Box 4'~49, Santa Ana, California Q27~2, oam ers, and STATF-
IJIDE ~EVFIOPERS, 51R2 Katella Avenue, Suite 1~6, Los Alamftos, ~allfornia,
agent, of certain real ~roperty situated in the Cttv of Anaheim, CountY o`
Orange, State of California, described as foilo~,,s;
THF WEST NALF OF THE hInRTN~AST OUqRTFR ~F THE NnRTr~FncT QIIARTF? ~F
THE SO~fTHE11ST QUARTER OF SEC.TI~~I 7~ TQ~INSHIP 1~ S~~ITH, RA°I~F 1n
l~lEST, IM THE R.4NCH0 L~S C~YOTE~, PFR -4!+P RF~~R~Pn I~J BnnK ~1 ~ PA~F
yn OF MfSCFLLANE~IIS MAPS, IN ?NF ~FFICF 0~ TNF r,ni~^~?v RFCn~~FP ~F
SAID CnUNTY.
EXCEPTIM!; TNERFFR~M TNAT P~aTIOM LY!~I!: !dFS?'FR1Y AF A LI~~F TH4T IS
PARA~LI?L WITH A~!~ ;o0,n0 FPET WESTFRLY OF THE EAeT ~~r~F ~G SA-n
S~UT'!i~A5T O,UARTER,
ALSO EXCFPT TNERFFRnr1 TI~AT pnRTlnni Ly~t~^ S~~I?NFRLY n~ A LIF!F THqT
IS PARALLFL WITN q~~p 3~5.~f^ FFFT SniITNFn,LY (1F THF N~~TH LIME OF
SAIO SnU?HEAST QtIApTER.
ALSO ExCEPT THE4FFRn~1 TH.qT pnRT~ny pFSC?~~?E~ ~r•! A ~FFn T~ FR4/IN
KFRSTEN, RErORpEp APRIL 2~~ 1~R~ Ipl HOOK 135~2, PA~F r~2f OF
QFFICIAL RECQRDS 1~l THE QFFICF OF SAID C~IIMTY RFMR~F~,
ALL THAT CERTA I~l LA^~n S I TUATEn I N THE STA'rF hF CpL I ~~"~! I A~ C~nrITY
OF O4A~!~E, CITY OF A~!AHEIM, OF.SCRiBE~ pS ~n~~~i.)c;
THE S~~JTH 2M.ls~ FFET OF THE Nn2TH 31,5,~~~ FFET OF TNF I~/FST 2nn
FEET OF THE EAST 54~ FFET OF THE N~RTHEAST Q~)A°TFQ ~F THF
SOUTHEAST Q,UARTER OF SECTIO~•I 7, 7ntJNg'{~p tF S~tiTt~, R~~~~E tn WFSr~
!N THF R.ANCHQ LOS C~YOTFS, AS SHOI~~M ON q l~n~ aFCnanFq IM 8~01< 51,
^r.r,F ~n OF MISCELLANfn~iS M~PS, RFCnRnS OF 9R~1`I~F CnnNTY,
CP,LIFnRNIA.
WHEREAS~ the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearina at the Civic
Center in the Clty of Araheim on January 11, 1~8?, at 1:3^ ~.m., nntice of sai~f
pubtic heartng havtng te~n auly aiven as re~uired hy 1a~,~ and Tn ar_rordance with the
Provislons of Che Anaheim Muntcipal Code, Chanter lQ.~~, tn hear and consider
evidence for and aoainst satd pro~ose~ reclassification and to investToate and make
findinas and recommendattons in connection therewith; saTd ouhlTc hearTna having
been conttnued to the Plannina Commtsston meer.inq of ~arch R, 1^R2; and
WNE4FAS, sald Commission, after due tnspectton, investioation and study made
by itse.lf and in its hehalf~ and after due cnnsirieratlon o° ali evldence and reoorts
offere~ at said hearlna, does ftn~i and determine thP f~))~Wina facts:
PC~2-31
/ ~,
~~~.
1. ThaL the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) to the RM-3000 (Residential, Multiple-Family)
zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for water
uses and general open space. However, medium-density residential land uses are
designated on the General Plan for properties located immediately to the north~vest
across Crescent Avenue.
3• That the proposed reciassification of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification af subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their perriitted uses generally established
thruughout the community.
5• That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with che Circulation
Element of ti~e General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by tf;e inter~sification of land use.
6. That one person indicated his presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that r.o correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAGT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from RS-A-43,000 (Residential
Agricultural) to the RM-3000 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to permit a 1-lot,
36-unit condominium subdivision with waivers of minimum building site area, maximum
structural height, minimum landscaped setback, minimum sideyard setback, minimum
recreation-leisure area and required type of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.9 acre, having a frontage of approximately
260 feet on the south side of Crescent Avenue and being located approximately 330 fee~
west of the centerline of Brookhurst Street; and does hereby appro~ie the Negative
Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental inpact report on the
basis that there would be no significant individua] or cumulative adverse environmental
impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plar
designates the subject property for water uses and general open space land uses
commensurat~ with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved
in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmenta] impacts; and that the
Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City
of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 17 RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) Zone and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-3000 (Residenti~l, Multiple-Family) Zone upon the
following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
Proposed use of subject property in order to preserve tlie safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
- 2 - PC82-31
-. .~
1, That the oom ~r(s) of suhject pronertY shall deerl to thc City of Anahetm
a strip of land 4~ feet in width from the c~nt~rlinr_ ~f the street
along Crescent Avenue for street ~•~i~iPnin~ purnoses,
2. That str~et lightin9 far.ilities al~nn Crnscent Avrnu~ shall he
installed as re~uired hy the Office of Utilities ~eneral Manager, an~l
in accordance t•lith specifications nn file in the Off~ce of Utiliti~s
Genernl Manaqer; and/or that a tiond, certificate of ~1~posit, letter of
eredit, or eash, in an amount and `orm sat!sfactorv to the CTtv of
P.naheim shall be post~d wit~~ the Cttv to ~uarantee the installation ~f
the abave-mentione~l rP~uirem~nts prior to occupanr_v.
3. That sidewalks shall be installed along Crescent Avrrue as rem~ireci bv
the City Enc~ineer anc~ in accor~lance s•rith standard ~lans an~f
specifications on file i^ the OfficP ~f rhe City Engineer.
I~. That the owner(s) of suhj~ct property shall pay to thP Citv of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as ~letermineri by the Citv Coi.inctl, for treP
planting purposes alonq Crescent Avenue.
5. That trash storage areas shall be nr~vid~d in accordance i~~ith anproved
plans on filr wlth the Office of the Exocutiv~ Oirer.tor of Public
41o rl;s .
6. That fire hydrants shali he installed an~1 charg~~1 as re~uired and
determined to be nec~ssary hy the Chief of the Fir~ Department prtor to
commencement of structural framinq.
?. That suhj~ct oronerty sha11 he serve~l hy u~dPrnrounrf uti!tti~s.
9. That drainaqe of sutiject propertY shall he ~'isposed of in a manner
satisfactorv to thP Cit~~ Enc~in~~r.
9. (n the event Yhat suhjer.t oro~ertv is to he dtvT~i~d for the purpnse of
sale, lease or finanr.ing; a parcPl map, to rer_~r~ the approve~i
division of suhject pro~erty,shall he su~~mittn~ to an~ a~prove~ hy the
City of Anaheim and then he recordr~rl in the o~fice ~f the Orange County
Recorder.
10. That the o~•m ~r of suhject property shall pay tn the f,ity of Anaheim the
appronriate parl< and recreation in-lieu f~es as d~termined to he
aporopriate hy the City Council, said fees t~ he pai~ ar. the time the
building permit is tssued.
!
11. That the orTginal documents of the cov~nants, conditions, anr~
restrictions, and a letter ad~lressr~l to drv~loper~s title companv
authorizing ~-ecordation ther~of, shall he suhmitt~ci to the Planninn
Department for transmittal to the fc,ltot~inp departments f~:- appmval:
City Attorney's Office, Putilic Uttlities Departm~nt, Ruilr~in~ Division,
and the Enginnerinn Division rrior to ftnal tract ma~ aon mval. Sai.?
dor.uments, as appr~v~d, shall be filP~1 an~ rr_cor~ind in the ~JffifP of
the Qrang~ Countv Rec~r~ler.
-3- PC`~T.-~1
Department, Buil~inp Dtvision, and the Fngineerinn Divisinn orior tn final
tract ma~ apnr~vil. Sai~ dor_um.r.nts, as aoprnv~~, shall I» file~ an~
r~cor~ed in the Office of the ~rang~ Coi.mtv P,ecnr~er.
1?.. That street nam~s sh~ll hr. approved hy the City Planninn ~eoartment
prio r to approval of a final tract map.
13. That aporopriatr. water assessment fe~s as ~r-.tnrmin~~ hy the Office of
Utilities General Manager shall he ~aid tn the Citv ~f Anaheim nrior to
the issuance of a buii~ing permit.
110• That atl nrivate str~ets shall be dev~l~ne~ in ~r_cor~ance ~,~ith thP City
of Anaheim's Standar~ Detail t•lo. 1?7_ for ~rivatP strFets, inclu~inq
installation of street name stgns. Plans fnr the nrivate street
lighting, as required hy the standar~ detail, sha~l he suhmitte~ to the
Duildin9 ~ivision for approval and inclusion ~•~ith the buildinn plans
prior to the issuance of buil~iTnn permits. (Private streets are thosP
which provide prima r/ arcess and/nr circulation ~-~ithin tne prolect.
15. If permanent street name signs have not been installer~, temporary
street name sions shall he lnstalled prior to a m~ ~~r_upancv.
1~,, That an ordinance r~zoning th~ suhject ornpertv shall in no event
hecom~ effnctive exce~t unon ~r f~lloa~in~ the recor~lati~n of Final
Tract 11ap No. 117?7 within the time specified in ~nvernment Code
Section 66~E63,5 or such further ttme as thP advisory aaency or City
Council may grant.
17, That the otUner(s) of suhjer_t pr~perty shall pav the traffic signal
assessment fee (Qrdinance No. 3Q96) in an amount as ~ietermined by the
City Council, for ear.h new c1~,reltinq unit ~rior t~ the issuance ~f a
huilriinc+ p~rmtt.
1'3, The seller shal) provide the purchaser of ear_h cnn~ominium unTt with
written information concernino Anaheim Municipal Co~ie 1~~.i2,S~~
pertaining to "parl~ina r~stricted to facilitate strr.et sweeoina". Such
written information i•~ill clearly indicate when on-srreet parkinq is
prohibited and the penalty for violarion.
1~. "No parlcing for street sweeping" stqns shall hr_ installe~l orior to
final street inspection as required hy the Puhtic 4/orics Executive
Director in accordance ~,~ith specifications on file ~vith the Street
Maintenance Division.
2~. That any structure mnre than 1~~ feet from an acceptahle vPhicular
acr_ess~•~ay shali be sprinl:lered as requTrnd hy the Chirf of the Fire
Dep~rtment,
21, That the locatlon of any prnposed drive~vays shall be subJect to th~
approval of the ''ity Traffic Cngineer.
22. Prtor to issuanc~ of bullding permits, the applicant shall present
evidence satisf~c~ory to the Chtef Buildin~ lnspectcsr that the units
will be in conformance ~Jith Ploise Insulation Stanrlarris soecifie~ in the
California Admtnistrative Code, Titla ?~.
-lE- PC~i2-31
2?. Prior to tssuanc~ of hull~inn permits, th~ a~nlicant sha11 nresPnt
evidenc~ satisf,actory to th~ Chtef 3uil~ing lnsp~r,tor that thP pronosA~
P~o_Ject is in cnnformance with Council Policv Number St~~, Sounri
Attenuation in Resid~ntial Prniects.
2~!. That a minimum }n-foot v!id~ acc~ss easem~nt from Cresr.ent Avenue
throuqh suhjP~t property, allo~•iin~ for oassage ~f h~a~y Pqui~ment for
constructton and realignment of portions of the f1ar~ Mtiler Go1f Course,
shall he dedicate~ to the f,ity of Anaheim.
z?. That if a record of survPy prepared hv a registar~~i civil en~ineer so
in~licates, the o~•m~r(s) of suhj~~r propertY shall nuit claim by deed to
the City of Anaheim that portion of suhj~ct n-onArty occu~ie~ hy an
existing golf cart path and r~strooms.
2~. That a right-of ~,ray agreement hetiveen the developer of suh.ject property
and Orange County F)ood Control District (OCF~) sha11 he excuted an~
recorded. Said agreement shall be satisfacturv to the Countv of
Orange, Envirc,nmental Ma~agement Agencv.
27. That all proposed structures shail conform t~ tFe City's Floor~ Hazard
Reduction Co~ie and that said structures shall be sub_jer_t to approva) bv
the Buildinq Department in accor~iance ~•~ith Sectinn t~,?°,1n'~ of the
Anaheim Ftunicipai Code.
2`~. That suhject pr~~erty shall he ~1r:Vn~nperl suhstantial~y in accnrriance
with olans and specifications o~ filr_ with ttie f,ity ~f Anaheim marlce~i
Revision No. 1 of Exhihit Nos. 1 through ~~,
24• R'ior to the introduction of an ordinanc~ rezoninn suhJer_t property,
Condittons Plo. 1, ?, 1+~ ~F~ ?1~~ ~r,~ ~~~ ?/, ahov~-m~ntioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights grante~ hy thts resolution shall
become rn.ill and v~1d by a~tinn of the Planning Commission unless saT~i
conditions are complied with ~•~ithin one vear from the rlate he rPof, ~~
such further timr as the Plannina Commission may nrant.
3~. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, 7, 9, 1L, 7.~, ?.7 ~n~l'?!~~ ahove-mentione~l,
shall he complied with pr~or to final buildinq .nd zonin~ inspections.
-5- PC~~-31
,~~
BE IT F~iRT~iFR RESOLVFD that the An~heim Citv Planninn Commission c~oes herehy
find and determine that the adoption o° this Resolution is exoresslv pre~licater~ upnn
applicant's compliance l~~ith each an~+ all of the c~nditinns herPinah~ve set f~rth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, he ri~clared invalir~ ~r im enfnrc~ahie hy the
final Juclc~ment of anY court of ~~m~rtent jiiris~liction, thPn this Resolutinn, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be dr,eme~1 null an~i vnid.
TNE F~REG~I~lG Rr-S0I_IITIQ"~ is signed anri anpr~vP~l hy me this °th day of
March, 1~$9.
/'-
r~- ~`~~`l/ -. °~'~.
C A~RMAN PRO TFMPORF.
APIANE i M C I TY PLA~~~~ 1 N~ Crn~~ SS I ~~i
ATTEST:
~,,2~.~ ,~° ~~
SECRETA?Y, A"!tiHEIM CITY PLA~!NING CQM?•tISStO`J
STATE OF CAIIFORFIIP )
COUNTY OF ORA"I!;F ) ss.
C ITY OF A~~AHF I M )
1, Edith L. Harrts, Secrr_tary of the Anaheim Citv Plannin~ CommTssion, do
herehy certify that the fnreuoin~ resolution was passecl an~l adopted at a meetina of
the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commisslon h~i~l on March 4, 1~14?, at 1:3~ p,m., hv the
following vote of tAe memhers thr_reof:
AYES; COMMISSI!1~!ERS: BARNES, E30UAS, FRY, HFRRST, KIN~, M~ BIIP.MFY
NOFS; COMMISSIOMERS: Nf1N~
ABSEPlT: CpMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE
I'•~ 411TMFSS WHFR50F, I have hereunto set my h~n~l thts "th ~iiy of March, 1QQ2.
~-~ ~C° ~/a.~.t.~:,,
SFCP,FTAR~, ANAHE I M C I TY PL'A~TM I N~ Cn~~~~ ~ S510N
-6- Pc82-31
~~;,: