PC 82-5.,.,
RFSO!_UTIQIJ tlQ. PC 3?-S
A RESO LUT I01d OF THE A~AIIE I M C I TY PLAFlN I Nr, CnMM I SS I ~V
THAT PETITIO~d FOR VARIAt~ICE FJO. 3251 BE GRA!dTE[1
bItIEREAS, tlie Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from ~lanfred I1. Lamers, 23!1 East Florence Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92305, ovm~r, Dennis M. Clayton, 3`~11 East La Palma Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92307, agent, o~ certain real property situate~i in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California descrihed as:
LOT 28 OF TRACT iJ~. 137^~ AS PER MAP RECORDED IF: B~~I: 43, PAr,ES 6
APJD 7 OF h11SCFLLAIlEOUS MAPS, IH THE OFf'ICF OF TNF Cf1~INTY RC-COR~JER
Of' SAID COUtlTY.
41HF.REl15, the Cit}~ Planning Commission did hold a publtc hearing at the City
Nall in the City of Anaheim on Januarv 11, 193?_, at 1:3n p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as requtred hy law and in accordance witF the
provisions of the Anaheim ~1unicipal Code, ChaptCr 1~.Q3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings
and recomnendations in connection t'~ere~•~ith; and
WHEP,EAS, said Commission, after due inspectfon, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evi~lence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foliot~~inc~ facts:
1. That the petitioner pronoses a a~aiver of the following to retain a room
addition to an existina single-family d4•~elling:
SECTIOfI 13.26.066.011 - ~linimum number and type of parking spaces.
7_ spaces enclosed in a 20 x 2~ garage reauired;
2 spaces in a 15' x 1;' carport existing)
2. That the ahove-mentioned waiver ts hereby granted on the basi~: that the
petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists 1n that denial would deprive s~~bject
property of a prTvilege enjoyed by other properties in the same zone and vici^itv;
and on the basis that adequate parking can be provided on-site for smaller cars.
3. That there ara exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condittons
appllcahle to the property involved or to the intended use o` the property that do
not apply generally to the property or ciass of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4, That the requested varia~ce is necessary for the prese~vation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. 7hat the re~uested variance ~•ii11 not he materi~lly dFtrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the nroperty or imnrovements in such vTcinity and zone
in vlhich the property ts located.
G, That no one indicated their presence at said puhlic hearing in
opposition; and that no corresrondence i~tas received in opposition to the subject
petition,
Pc82-5
!^~ r'O
ENVIROtdMEWTAL It1PACT FIIdDIIJG: That the Anaheim City Plannina Commission has
revie~~ed the proposal to retain a room addition to an exlstin9 s(ngle-family dwelling
with iaaiver of minimum number and type of parl<inn spaces on a rnctangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately G00~ square feet, having a frontage of
approximately 61 feet on the seuth side of Florence /lvenu, (23~ East Florence
Avenue); and does hereby approve the Negative Declarat(on from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report on the 6asis that there t•ro uld be no
siqnificant individuai or cumu)ative acfverse environmental impact due to the approval
of this tlegative Declaratton since the Glnaheim Generai Plan drsiqnates the subject
property for medium density residential land uses commensurate ~•~ith the proposai;
that no sensitive environmental im~acts ar~ involved in the prooosal; that the
Initiai Study suhmitted by the petitioner indicatE:s no si~niflcant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that t~ie tdegative Declaration
substantiating the Toregoing findings is on file in the City of Aneheim Planning
Department.
P~OIJ, TfIE~EFOP,E, RE IT RESOLVFD that the Anaheim City Plannina Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Varfance, uo~n the follo~•~ing condttions rahich
are hereby found to be a necessary preerequisite to the pr~posed use of the subject
property in order Co preserve the safety and aeneral welfare of the Citir_ens of the
City of Anaheim:
1. That suhject property shall be developed suhstantially in accordance o~ith
plans and specifPcations on file ~vith tiie City of Anaheim mar(;ed Exf~ibit No.
1.
BE IT FURTtiER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does fiereby
ftnd and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressiy predicated upon
applicant~s compliance a~ith eaci~ and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final Judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
anr! any approvals herein contained, sha11 Le deemed nuli and votd.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUT~ON is signed and approved hy me this 11th day of
January, 19II2,
A'T"~EST •
.~-=~ ~ ~ ~~.
CHAIRIIAM, AMAHEIM ITY Pl_AM~IIN~ C0~1MISSION
. ~..
`~~ .~ ~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIMG COM~4ISSION
PC$2-:
•-~ ,-~
STATE OF CAt,IFORMIA )
COUIJTY Of' ORANGE ) ss.
C 1TY OF APIAHE IM )
i, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannina Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~•~as passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission neld on January 11, 19$2, hy the followino vote
of the memhers thereof: ~
AYES: COt1MISSIOFlERS: B~RNE~, BOUAS, BUSFIORE, FRY, HERRST, t:INr,, MC BUR~IEY
NOES: COPIMISSlONERS: PJOtIE
ABSENT: CQI1MISSlOh1ERS: MONE
IP! 411TI~ESS 41HEREOF, i have hereunto set m,r• hand this llth day of January,
19F32.
~=~-~'`~- ~ • ~~~
SECRFTARY, ANAN[IM CITY PLl1MNING COM~~ISSIOtd
PCA2-5