Loading...
PC 82-61~',F~;iu.-a ~ . ..... ~ . . . - - ~ ?:',~i .-~ RESOLUTIOtd IJO, PC32-61 A RESOLUTIOiJ OF THE AtJAHEIFi CITY PLAI~rl1(~G COMMISSIOP! Tl1AT P[TITIOIJ FOR CONDITIONAL USE P[R111T PJO. 2317 13F GRAI•ITED WfiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission diri receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from [iR00KMORE ARMS, 1641 Langley Avenue, Irvine, California, 92714, owner, and iJiCK RODOGMA, 374 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, California 92504, agent, of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Lalifornia, described as: THAT PORTIOH OF TIiE SOUTli!•lEST QUARTER OF SECTIOtJ 17, TOWP~SIIIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 tJEST IN Tl1E RANCHO LOS COYOTES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHE1t1, COUPJTY OF ORAUGE, STATE OF CALIFORtdIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IV 8001< 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLAPlEOUS MAPS, IIJ THE QFFICE OF THE COUI4TY RECORDER OF SAID COUfJTY DESCRIQED AS FOLLOI•1S: EiEGIPJIVING AT TIIE idORTHWEST CORPIER OF THE SOUTHI•IEST QUARTER OF iHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTIOtJ AS S'101•!tJ 0~I A 11AP OF TRACT N0. 5162 FILED IN BOOK 302, t'AGES 24 TO 29 IPlCLUSIVE OF MiSCELLANE0U5 MAPS, IFJ TIiE OfFICE OF THE COUIJTY R~CORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THEPlCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LIiJE OF SAID SOUTIi'rlEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTIIWEST QUARTER tJORTH 8go 58' 11" EAST &0.00 FEET TO A POItJT ON A L I IJE TNAT I S PARALLEL lJl TH APlD D i STA~dT 60.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CEI~TERLINE OF E3ROOI:HURST STREET AS SNOWN ON ~1AP OF TRACT 5162; SA I D PO I NT ALSO [3E I IJG THE TRUE PO I NT OF BEG I IJN I NG; TIiEfJCE CONTIt~UIP~G ALOi~G SAID tJORTHERLY LIN[ NORTN 890 58' 11" EAST 220.02 FEET TO TIiE tJORTHWEST CORtJER OF SAID TRACT; TI~ENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LI~JE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH OOo 40' 06" bJEST 37s.~3 `EET TO A P01(dT ON A LItJE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH APJD DISTAtJT 32.00 FEET tdORTHERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF BROOY.MORE AVEtJUE AS SHOI•1N ON SAID TRACT MAP; 7HEIJCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTIi 8'3~ 19' S4" WEST 205.00 FEET TO THE E3EGIMNIPJG OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTIIEASTERLY HAVItJG A RADIUS OF 15,00 FEET TH[ tdORTHERLY TERI•11~lUS OF SAID CURVE E3EING iANGENT WITIi FIRST MEfJTIONED PARALLEL LINE; TIIEi•ICE WESTERLY, NOfiTHWESTERLY AP~D NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TfiROUGH A CE~ITRAL AtJGLE OF 900 00' 00", APJ ARC DISTANCE QF 23.5f FEET; THENCE ALONG FIRST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE NORTfi 00° 40' OG" EAST 3~1.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POIP7T OF DEGIIJNING. Wf1EREAS, the City Ptanning Commission did hold a puhlic heartng at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 5, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and 4JIIEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and afiter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hcaring, does find and determine the followtng facts: PCBz-Gt 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Ar~aheim t1unicipal Code Section 1i.44,050,010 to s~it: to permit on-salr_ beer and roine in an existing restaurant. 2. That tlie proposed use wiil not adversely affect the adjoinin9 land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate .`.o allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 4. That tlie granting of the Conditiorzal Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, ~oill not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of ttie Citizens of the City of Anaheim, 5. Tliat the traffic generated by tfie proposed use ~•~i 11 not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved Yo carry the traffic in the area. 6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opp~sition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. ENVIRONt~ENTAL IPiPACT PIPlDIIJG: The Planning Director or his authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls a~ithin the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR, NOW, TIiEREFORE, E3E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditiona) Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are f,ereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That subject property shall be developee+ substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked cxhibit IJos. 1 and 2. [3~ IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resalutic~n is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions heretnabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOItJG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 5th day of April, 19B?. ~~`a ~ ' ~~,Q.o-.~ CNA 1 RMAN, ANAHE I ht C I TY PLA~I~J I NG COMM I SS I OP~ ATTEST: ~ D d'.l~fn~ ~c • j~~,a, SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COPIMISSIOP~ ;:~ -2- PC$2-61 't~ . .. . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF AidAHEiM ) I, Edith L. tiarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify tfiat the foregoing resolution was passed and adop~ed at a meeting o` the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on April 5, 1982. by the foitowing vote af the mernbers t~~ereof: AYES: COMMISSIOPlERS: DARtlE5, BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, NERBST, 'I.ING, MC BURNEY NOES: COMMISSIO(dERS: NOPlE A[35ENT: COt1t11SSI0NERS: NONE ' IPlIJITNESS WFIEREOF, I have tiereunto set my hand this 5th day of April, 193~- ~~ ~~ ~~ SECRETARY, ANAHE 111 C I TY LAf~1N I NG COMM I SS I ON "'; -3- PC82-6t