PC 82-78~
, _~ ~-.
RESOLUTI0~1 N0. PCu2-7£3
/1 RESOLI:TI ~1! OF TtiE AtiAHE I M C I TY PLANtJ I tIG CONMI SS I0~1
TIIAT PETITION FQR RECLASSIFIC/1TIOM N11. 31-•".2-1~ DE r,R~1NTED.
WIIEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verif~ed
petition for Reclassi`ication from RICIIARD l1. l1hID LOTTIE 11EITShIUSEPI, 352~
Savanna Street, Anaheim, Cal iFornia 92S01F, owners, and 41l1RRF.PI OF1IEL~PMEhlT, 41i~F
"E" Worth Newport l3oulevard, PJea~~ort Eieach, Cali{ornia 92(C3 a9ent, of certain
real property sttuated in the City of An~heim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as follcw~s:
PARC[l. 1: LOT 14 OF TRACT N0. 743~ IM TFIE CITY OF ANAHEIPI, COUNTY
OF OP.AIJGE STr1TE OF CALiFORFIIA FlS SFIOW~J Oil A 11AP THC-REOF P,ECOFDED
IP! 8001; 22, PArE 10, MISCELLAPlEOUS MnPS, IPI THE OFFIC[ ~F TNE
COUNTY RECORDEP, OF SFlID COUPITY.
PARCEL 2: TIiAT PORTIOt! OF TIfE E~ST OPlE-HALF OF TIIE FlORTHEAST
QUARTER OF TIIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTIODI 15 li: TIIE TOt:lflS{IIP 4
SOUTH, R/111!;E ,1 1 41EST, S/1M BERPlABD I NO f3qSE AtdD t1ER I DI At~, I N TIiE C ITY
OF APJAHEIPt, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STA'i'E OF CAUFOP.IlIA DESCRIBED flS
FOLLOt•IS;
';EfIPJNIPIC, AT A PO1NT IN THE NORTIiERLY LIN[ OF TR~CT N0. 743, IN
THE COUMTY OF OR.4iJGE, STATE OF CALIFORtIIA, ~S SHOIltI OPI A h1AP
THEREOF RECORDED IN DOOI; 22, PARE 1~, I•11SCELLANEDUS t111P5, RECORDS
OF S~I D OP,AtdGE COUhJTY, DISTAPJT SOUTFI 89 DECRE[5 39 '+lEST 311E FEET
FROhi THE EAST Llt•lE 0~ SAID SECTIOPJ 15; RUNPJItJ(; ThIENCE NORTH,
PARALLEL WITN THE EAST LItdE OF SAI~ SECTIOtd 15,15> FEET; TIIEP~CE
SOUTH4/ESTERLY TO A P01 NT I Pl THE t1E5T L I NE ~F 711[ EAST ONE-HALF OF
TIIE NORTHE~ST QI;~RT[R OF TfIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF S111D SECTIOId 15,
UISTA~IT TfiEREOPJ 3S FEET NORTfi OF TiIE PIORTII LINE 0!" LOT 15 OF SAID
TP,ACT PlO. 743~ THENCE SOUTtI ALOPIG SAID 41EST LIPlE, 35 FEET TO TIiE
t~OP.TH L119E OF SAID LOT 15; THEIJCE NORTII 89 DEGREES 3~ MINUTES EI1ST
A~Ot7G T}1G NOETtI LI`![ ^F S.~ID TRACT N~. 7i~3, 3"~•6~ FEET Tn THE
POIIJT OF I3EG1ldtditJG.
EXCEPTI MG TIIER[FR0~4 TIIAT PORTI QN GfiANTED T~ JACY. flURROUGIiS, A
t1l1RR1 ED MAPI BY DEED RECOP,DED DECEhIBEP. 10, 1953. ~W 4001: 2G31 P/1GE
3F3~~ OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS IWSTRU~9E(~lT P10. 8490~.
ALSO EXCEPT TFIEREFROt1 TUAT PORTION OF SAID LAwD IP~CLUDED IN THE
DEED TO ORAtdGE COUNTY FLOOD C01ITP.OL DISTRICT RECORDED FEF3RUARY 15,
1960 IIIf300K 5097 PAGE 306, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
l•IfIE(tEAS, the City Ptannin9 Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on Piay 3, 1982, at 5:3~ p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by la~•~ ancl in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 153.'13, to hear and, consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification ancl tn investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection there~~~ith; and
PC82-78
-..,..
_ .: .~
.~ ~.
WHERE~S, siicl ~:n~ar~i~,~n,:, ,ifter due inspection, investigati.nn and study made
bY itself ancl in its behalf, and aFter due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearin9, does find ancl determine the follo!•~inc~ facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RS-A-43,00~ (f=~esidential-Agricultural) Zone to the RM-3000 (Residential, Multiple-
Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject pro~erty for medium
and low-medium density residential land uses.
3• That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly arnj proper developmer~: of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassifica:ion of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses local'y established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the conmunity.
5. That the pro~sed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase i~ traffic a~hich will be
ger,erated by the intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence 4~as received in opposition to the subject
petition.
EPJVIROMMEWTAL IMPACT FI4IDIPJG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the RS-A-43,000
(Residentiai-Agricultural) Zone to the R~1-3000 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone
and to permit waiver of required lot frontage, maximum structural height and minimum
landscaped setback to construct a 15-unit residential condominium complex on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approxfmately 1.2 acres, having a
frontaye of approximately 120 feet on the north side of Savanna Street, and being
located approximately 425 feet west ~f the centerline of 1<nott Street (352g W.
Savanna Street); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there wo~id
be no significant irdividual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the
approvai of this PJegative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates tfie
subject property for medium and low-medium density residential) and uses commensurate
with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are invoived in the
proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no
significant individual or cumutative adverse environmental impacts; and that the
Wegative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of
Anaheim Planning Department.
r~ow, TIIEREFORE, QE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition far Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
lf3-Zoning of the Anaheim Pfunicipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residentiat-Agricultural) Zone and to incorporate said
described property into the RP1-3~00 (Residential, Ptultiple-Family) Zone upon the
following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
-2- PC82-78 -
~"~
~
~-.
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of M ahetm a
strip of land 32 feet in a~idth from the centerline of the street along
Savanna Street for street v~idening purposes.
2. That all engineeriny requirements of the City of ~naheim along Savanna
Street including preparation of ioiprovement plans ancl installation of all
improvements sucti as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and
pavement, sewer and drainage facilities, or other appurtena~t work, shall be
complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; and that street
lighting facilities along Savanna Street shall be installed as required by
the Office of the Utilities General Manager in accordance with
specifications on file in the Office of Utilities C,eneral Manager. Security
in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in
an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted vrith
the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the above-mentioned
improvements. Said security shall be posted with the City prior to
approval of improvement plans. The above-required improvements shall be
installed prior to occupancy.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance a~ith appraved plans
on file with the Office of the Executive Director of Public 4lorks.
4. That fire hydrants shall be instailed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of
structural framing.
5, That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
7. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate
by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the buiiding permit is
issued.
8. That the original documents of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions,
and a letter addressed to developer's title company authorizing recordation
thereof, shall be submitted to the City Attorney's office and approved by
the City Attorney's Office, Public Utilities Department, auilding Division,
and the Engineering Division prior to final tract map approval. Said
documents, as approved, shall be filed and recorded in the Office of the
Orange County Recorder.
~. That plans for the private street lighting, as required by the standard
detail, shall be submitted to the (3uilding Division for approval and
inclusion with the building plans prior to the issuance of building permits.
(Private streets are those which provide primary access and/or circulation
within the praject.
10. That ~f permanent street name si~ns have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
-3- PC82-78
~,
.. . .. ... . . . ... . . , ,Y~,
,---,
11. That the owner(s) of sub.ject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance IJo. 3II96) in an amount as determined by the City
Council, for each ne+•i d.relling unit prior to the issuance of a buiiding
permit.
12. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for tree planting
purposes along Savanna Street.
13. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the ()ffice of
Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the Cit/ of An~heim prlor to the
issuance of a buildin9 permit.
14. That the seller shall provide the purchaser of each condominium unit with
written information concernir.g Anaheim Ftunicipal Code 14.32.5~0 pertaining
to "parking restricted to facilitate street sweeping". Such written
information will clearly indicate when on-street parking is prohibited and
the penalty for violation.
15- That "no parking for street s~~~eepinc~" signs shall be installed prior to
finai streec inspection as required by the Public 4lorks Executive Director
in accordance with specifications on file with the Street Maintenance
Divis(on.
1h. That a 6-foot high masonry wall shail be constructed along the nortfi
property line and along the northerly portion of the east property line
abutting tlie RS-A-~~3,00~ Zoned properties.
17. That prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall present
evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that the proposed
project is in conformance vrith Councii Policy IJumber 5~E2, Sound Attenuation
in Residential Projects.
1II. That subject property sha11 be deveioped substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications an file with the Ci:y of Anaheim mar~:ed Exhibit
PJos. 1 tnrough 5; provided, ho~aever, that the private street driveway from
Savanna Street may be a minimum of twe~ty-five (25) feet wide.
~9• That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezontng subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 12, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shal) bc;come null and void
by action of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied
with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the
Pl~nning Commission may grant.
20. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, E~, 1G and 18, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTFIER RESOLVE6 that the Anahelm City Planning Commisstan does hereby
find and determine that ado~tion of this Resolution is axpressly predicated upon
epplicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or aiiy part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvais herein contained, shall be deemed null and void,
-4- PC82-78
Tfl[ FOREGOINC RESOLUTION is signed and approved bv me this 3rd day of May,
~9t~2.
- ~~-,-~- ~ • I~ ~
CHAIRMAN, AMANEIP? CITY PL/ItJPlING COMHISSIOt•J
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, A~dAhIE I N C I Y P~ NNI NG COMt11 SS I OP!
STATE OF CALI FORPIIFl )
COUP~TY OF ORANGE ) ss .
C I TY OF ANAfIE I M )
I, Edith L. liarris, Secretary of the llnaheim ~ity Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Flay 3, 1982, by the follcwing voTe of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMPIISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSf10RE, FRY, FIERBST, KIPIG, MC Bt1RtdEY
NOES: COMF115SIONERS: PJOPlE
A6SEPIT: COM~iIS510tJERS: NONE
IP~ IJITPlFSS WfIEP,EOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of Ptay, 1982.
~ ~c.~ ~ ~4F~~ ~ ~
SECP,ETAP,Y, At~AHEiM CITY PLAtJ~JiNG COMMISSION
-5- PC82-18