PC 83-10~-,
~
RESOLUTION NO. PC83-10
~.Y ..
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEZM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE nERMTT N0. 2403 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheis City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from LA MANCHA DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES,
j' LTD., ~5720 Ventura Boulevard, #600, Encino, California 91436, owner, and
UNITED OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, 1717 Orangewood Avenue, Suite A, Orange,
California 92668, agent of certain real preperty situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
F''.
~.;:~.
' THE EAST 190.00 FEET OF THE SOU1?I 200.00 FEET OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUART£R OF THE SOUTHEASi QUARTER OF SECTION
r~' 14, TONTNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WES: IN THE RANCHO LOS
~.; COYOTES~ CITY Or' ANAh^ZM~ COUNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE OF
~~. CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP :ECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF
z.
" MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
, RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THAT POFY'i'ION CONVEXED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BY DEED RECORDED .7ARCH 5, 1951 IN BOOK 2153, PAGE 250,
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on January 10, 1983 at 1:30 p.m., notice
af said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHF.REAS, said Commission, aftcr due inspection, investigation and
atudy made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
erideRCe ~nd reports uEfered ~t said f~earing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
sse permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.46.050.080 to
wit: to permit a billboard in the CH (Commercial, Heavy) zone with Naivers of:
(a) SECTIpN 18.05.144 - Maximwn display area
(300 sq. ft. permitted;
672 sq, ft~ proposed)
(b) SECTION 16.05,116.020 - Maximum height
(27 ft. maximum within 300 ft. o± xny
reaidential struc~•:.~ pernutted; +
42 ft. proposed within 275 feet of
single-family dwellings)
2. That the requested waivers are hereby denied on the basis that
no hardships were demonstrated pertaining to the property's size, location,
shape, topoqraphy or surroundingg,
#0420I
PC83-10
/~ ~.
3. Tiiat the proposed use is nereby denied on the basis that it
substantiaily exceeds Code requirements and would set an undesirable precedent
in the surrrounding area.
4• That the proposed .se will adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be
located.
5. That the size and shape uE the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimentai to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safetp and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6• That the qranting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will be detrimental to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7• That the traff?c generated by the proposed use will impose an
undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area.
8• That three persoas indicated their presence at said public
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received. in opposition
to the subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit a billboard in the CH
(Commercial, Heavy) zone with waivers of maximum display area and maximum
height on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately
0.51 acre located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Heach Boulevard ~nd
further described as 965-995 South Beach Boulevard; and does hereby approve
the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental
impact report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to th~ approval of this Negative
Declaration since the A;:u'ieim General Plan designates the subject property for
general commercial land uses commensurates with the proposal; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial
Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim
Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, on
the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this lOth day
of January, 1983.
~
1
C ~. AHEIM CI PLANN COMMISSION ~
ATTEST: I
I.
_ ~ - j
~ ~~ ,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
t
-2 PC83-10 ~'
•^~ ~"`~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAIiEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do he~eby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meetinq of the Anaheim Citp Planning Commission held on January
10, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY, H~RBST, KING, LP. CLAIRE~
MC BURPIEY
NOES: COMMISSIONER;: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, S have hereunto set my hand this lOth day of
January, 1983.
~~ x ~r~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
PC83-10
..~.,,. ,,... , . _....~