PC 83-100,°'',, ,.,,,
RESOLUTION NO. PC88-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDING PLAP7NING COMMISSIOI3 RESOLUTION N0. PC76-133
GRA.NTED IN CONNECTION WITH VARIA[QCE NO. 2824
WHEREAS, Variance No. 2824 to establish a second freestanding sign
(tenant panel sign) with waivers of (a) maximum number of freeskanding signs,
(b) permitted locatio.: of freestanding signs, (c) mini.mum distance between
freestanding signs, and (d) maximum sign height, was granted, in part,
(waivers (a), (b), and (c) were granted and waiver (d) was withdrawn by the
petitioneri by the Planning Commission on July 7, 1976, Resolution No.
PC76-133; and
WHEREAS, on April 25, 1977, the Planning Comrnission determined that
revised plans increasing tt~e approved sign area from 144 to 315 square feet
was in stibstantial conformance wzth the original approval of petition for
Variance No. 2824, and therefore, approved said revised plans; an6
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
request to readvertise ~Iariance No. 2824 to medify the on-site signing from
JOHN E. WEBURG, 1360 East Maple, Glendale, California 91205, owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California described as:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 OF ANAHEIM EXTENSION IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIDI, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A
MAP OF SURVEY By WILLIAM HAMEL AND FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES~ CALIFORNIA, A COPY OF WHICH
IS SHOWN IN BOOK 3 PAGE 163 ET SEQ. ENTITLED "LOS ANGELES
COUNTY MAPS" IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDF.R OF SAID
ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE CEfITEP.LINE OF CEt1TER ~TREET,
NpRTH 74° 37' 25" EAST 770.13 FEET FROP1 THE CENTERLINE OF
EAST STREET, AS SAID STREETS ARE SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE
NORTH 74° 37' 25" EAST 180.00 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF
CENTER STREET; THENCE NORTH 15° 24' 15" WEST 480.00 FEET
PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST STREET TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO ZION EVANGELICAL
LUTHERAN CHURCH OF ANAHEIM, RECORDED JUNE 30, 1961 IN ROOK
5770 PAGE 813 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 7~° 37' 25"
WEST 180.00 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL
WITH SAID CENTERLINE OF EAST STREET WHICH PASSES THROUGH T&5
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOGTH 15° 24` 15" EAST 480.00 FEET
ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LAND IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE AREA SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY~ IN
B~OK 28 PAGE 22 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS.
#06381 PC83-lU0
~~,~.,.~
y,:.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a gublic hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 16, 1983, at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of L-he Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and agai~ist said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
followinq facts:
1. That the petitionez proposed waivers of ~he following to retain
two freestanding signs:
(a1 SECTIOid 18.05.093.021 - Maximum number of freestanding signs.
(1 permitted; 2 proposed)
(t) SECTION 18.05.093.023 - Pecmitted location of freestanding signs.
(72-foot setback from side property line
required; 5 and 30 feet proposed)
(c) SECTION 18.OS.U93.0231 - Minimum distance between freestanding
si ns. (300 feet required; 120 feet
proposed)
2. That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby granted on the basis
that the petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists due to the location
and size of subject property and the location of the building relative to the
property boundaries; and that street application oE the ~oning Code deprives
the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties ~n identical zoning
classification in the vicinity.
3. TLat tY,ere ~re exceptzonal or Axtraordi~ary circums~ances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not app2y generally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the request~~3 variance will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence aas received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or his
authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls
within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11, as defined in the
State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to prepare an EIR.
_2_ PC83-100
r'"" ` /~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does heceby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to F_eserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition No. 1,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any pas-t thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 16th day
of May, 1983.
~~~~ % /_/
CHAIRMAN~ 0 TEMPORE
ANAHEIM TY PLANNING COMt4ISSI0N
ATTEST:
~ ~ .~° /~~~.,.~..
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ST~TE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meetin9 of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May 16,
1983, by the following vote of the members there of:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ HERBST~ KING~ MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY~ LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May,
1983.
~1~,G .~ ~k~~,..w
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_3_ PC83-100