PC 83-153RESOLUTION NO. PC83-153
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOP7
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 03-84-2 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission d:d receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from THE HUSTON BUILDING, 438 East Katella
Avenue, Suite H, Oran~e, California 92667, owner, and J03AM OZYP, 7227 Cedar,
San bernardino, California 92406, agent, of ~ertain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
folloias:
FARCEL 1:
LOT 100 OF TRACT N0. 2302, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 76, PAGES 29, 30, AND 31 OF MISCELLANEOUS
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OP THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL 2;
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3 AND 6 OF MILES RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS 6tAPS~ IN THE
QFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND;
9SGINNING AT A POINT IN THF SOUTH LINE OF THAT PORTION OF THE
EAST 250.00 FEET OF SAID LOT SIX, LYING NORTH OF A LINE
PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT SIX AND PASSING
THROUGH A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD, FORM~RLY
SPADRA ROAD~ AS SAID ROAD EXISTING APRIL 29, 1929~ DISTANT
712.00 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF ROMNF.YA DRIVE, DISTANT
ALOt1G SAID SUUTH LiN~; NORTH 89° 33' 18" WEST A DISTANCE OF
42.69 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OE SAID HARBOR BOULEVARD~ 60.00
FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON A MAp OF TRACT N0. 2302~ RECORDED IN
BOOK 76, PAGES 29 TO 31, INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH
LINE NORTH 89° 33' 18" WEST A DISTANCE OF 207.23 FEET TO THE
WEST LIt7E OE THE EAST 250 FEET OF SAID LOT SIX; THENCE ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 250 FEET OF SAID LOT SIX, NORTH 0°
26' 42' EAST A DISTANCE OF 86.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80° 06'
00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 117.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 43' 09
EAST A DISTANCE OF 73.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15° 55' 24" EAST
68.A7 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LAND IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE AREA SHOWN ON A MAP FILED iN
BOOK 67, PAGE 49 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS IN THE OFFICE OF SAID
COUNTY Rh;CORDER.
PARCEL 3:
THAT PORTION OF GOT 6 OF p1ILES RANCHO~ IN tHE CITY OE ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ AS PER MAP F.~CORDED IN
BOOK 4~ PAGE 7 OF b1ISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFF2CE OC THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
~0027r PC83-153
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON A THE WESTERLY LINE OF HARBOR
BOULE4AkD~ FORMERLY SPADRA ROAD~ AS SAID ROAD EXISTING APRIL
29~ 1929~ DISTANT 712.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE INTERSECTION
WITH THE CENTERLIidE OF ROMNEYA DRIVE; THENCE WESTERLY 150.00
FEET PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE
SOUTHERLY 50.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTEhLY LINE OF
HARBOR IIOULEVARD; THENCE EASTERLY 150.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH
SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 6 TO SAID WESTERLY LINE OF HARBOR
BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTHERLY 50.00 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY
LINE TO THE POIN4' OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS PARCGL 8 IN THE
EINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED AUGUST 4~ 1958, IN BOOK
4371~ PAGE 185, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
SAID LAND IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE AREA SHOWN ON A MAP EILED IN
BOOK 10, PAGE 24 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL 4:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 6 OF MILES RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~
CUUNTY OF ORAtdGE~ STATE GF' CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 4~ PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID CGUNTY~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SPADRA ROAD AS SAID
ROAD EX7STED ON APRIL 29~ 1929~ 552 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE
INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF SPADRA RCAD WITH THE CENTER
LINE OF ROMNEYA DRIVE; THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID LOT SIX~ 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO THE
47EST LZNE OF S°FDP.T P.OF.D 120.QD F£ET; TAEP7CE Er.ST PAt2ALLEi TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT SIX, 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
110.00 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
LOT SIX, 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 110.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
PAkCEL 5:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 6 OF MILES RANCHO~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~
COUNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE OF CALIFORN7A~ AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 4~ PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANGOUS MAPS~ IN OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LI[dE OF SAID LOT, DISTP.NT
712.00 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE, FROM ITS
INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT~ (SAID EAST AND
SOUTH LOT LINES BEING CONSTRUED TO BE THE CENTER LINE OF
ADJOINING ROADS AS SHO~QN ON SAID MAP); THENCE WESTERLY ON A
i.INE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAZD LOT, 180.00 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING WESTERLY ALONG
SAID LAST MENTIONED LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
L~T, 1U~.0~ FEET; THENCE SOpTH PAAALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF
SAID LOT, 210.00 FEET; TNENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT~ 100.00 FBET; THGNCE NORTH PARALLEL 47ITH THE
EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 210 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
-2- PC83-153
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 22, 1983 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice uf said public hearing having been duly oiven as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said p~blic hearing having been continued to the Planning
Commission meeting of September 7, 1983; and
WHEREAS, said Comr..ission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detecmine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
property from the CG (Commercial, General) and RS-7200 (Residential,
Single-Family) Zones to the CL (COmmercial, Limited) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim Gene:al Plan designates subject property for
general commercial land uses.
3. That the proposed rec~assification of subject property is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the
community.
4. rhat the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to r_he zones and their permitted uses locally ~st3blished in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property req~ires
the improvement of abutting streets in a~:cordance with the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That 9 persons indicated their presence at the ;igust 22, 1983
public hearing in opposition and no one indicated their presence at the
September 7, 1983 public hearing in oppo~ition; and that no correspondence was
received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
CG (Commercial, General) and RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Family} Zones to the
CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone to permit a 3-story, 120-room motel on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.48 acres,
having a frontage of approximately 230 feet on the west side of Harbor
Boulevard, being located approximately 550 feet north of the centerline of
Romneya Drive, and further described as 1251 North Harbor Boulevard; and does
hereby approve the tdegative Declarati~n upon finding that it has considered
the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public
review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effact on the environment.
-3- PC83-153
NOW, THEREFORE, gE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-ZOning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described property from CG (COmmercial, Gener~l) and R3-7200
(Residential, Single-Family) Zones and to incorporate said described property
into the CL (COmmercial, Limited) Zone upon the following cond.itions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prezeguisite to the proposed use of subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citi2ens
of the City of Anaheim:
1• That the owner of subject propecty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee for tree planting purposes along Harbor Boulevard and Raleigh
Street in an amount as determined by the City Council.
Z• That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate water
assessment fees shalJ. be paid to the City o€ Anaheim, in an amount
as determined by the Office of the Utilities General Manager.
3• Tl~at prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate trafPic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for new commercial
buildings.
~• That the vehicular access rights, except at approved access points,
to Harbor Boulevard and Raleigh Street shall be dedicated to the
City of Anaheim.
5• That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of
Raleigh Street as required by the City Engineer.
6• That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
7• That the owner of subject propecty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee for street lighting along Harbor Boulevard and Raleigh St:eet
in an amount as determined by the Cir.y Council.
$• That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants
shall be installed and charged as required and determine~~ to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
9• That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Division.
10. That a 6-foot high masonry block wall shall be constructed along the
south and west property lines adjacent to the resi3ential zoning
and/or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee th_ installation
of said wall prior to final building inspection.
11. That annexation of the northwesterly portion of subje~t property to
the City of Anaheim shall be commenced prior to introduction of an
ordinance rezoning this property.
-4-
PC83-153
~~..,; . . .. .
12• That completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2482,
13, That any proposed parking area lighting fixtures shall be
down-lighted with a maximum height of 12 feet. Said lighting
fixtures shall be ditected away from adjacent property lines to
protect the residential integr.ity of the area.
14. That subject property shall be deveioped substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~ith the City of Anaheim
marked Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3; provided,
however, that kitchen efficiency units may be installed in no more
than twenty-five percent (258) of the motel units, with a maximum of
6-cubic foot refrigerators, two-burner stoves excluding oven and
baking facilities, and sing.le compartment s±nks, except that the
manager's unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facilities; and
further providing that the 3-foot wide pedestrian easement along the
northerly property line is not required.
15. That prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resolution, or prior to the time that a building permit is issued,
or within a period of one year from the date of this resolution,
whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 4, 7, lp, 11, and 12,
a~ove-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further
tine to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with
Section 18.03.O9p of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
16. That priot to final building and zoning inspection~, Condition Nos.
5, 6, 9, 10, 13 and 14, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does heteby fii.d and determine that adoption of this rreso].tttior. is expressly
predicated uP~n agplicant'S compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such candition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
coml~etent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day
of September, 1983.
~~~~~
CHAIRMAN~ AN EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ .
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-5-
PC83-153
r~
STATE OP CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OP ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Cummission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meetina of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September
7, 1983, by the foi~owing vote of the members thereof:
AY~S: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERBST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE~
MC BURNEY
NOES: ~OMMISSIONERS: NUNE
ABSENT: COPtMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of
September, 1983.
~ ,
_ •~--~. ~°,_~~,,, •
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
;.~
-6- PC83-153 (,