PC 83-155} ~~' /^°~
~•~•.~~
I
.
J~~ ~; ~
~R'r,` ;
i
~~. : i
o x.
" RESOLUTION NO. PC83-155
„';,;,
A FESOLUTION OF TfiE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
%`i THAT PETITION YOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 83-84-5 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 76 South
t•,! Claudina Street, #300, Anaheim, California 92805, owner, and AMIL SHAB, 2545
Woodland Drive, Anaheim, California 92801, agent of certain real property
situaLed in the City of Ai~aheim, r_ounty of Orange, State of California,
.,. described as follows:
ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS
24, 25, AND 26 OF TH^z ENTERPRISE TRACT PER MAP THEREOF
RECORDED IN BOOK 4~ PAGE 89 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 24; THENCE
ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 14° 25' 44" WEST,
108.47 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE WESTERLY 35,00 FEET
OF THE NORTHERLY 50.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 24; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WESTERLY 35.00 FEET OF THE
SOUTHERLY 50.00 FEET NORTH 75° 25' 35" EAST 35.00 FEET ~ND
NORTH 14° 25' 44" WEST, 50.00 FEET TO THE C70RTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 24; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF LOTS 24, 25~
AND 26 NORTH 75° 25' 35" EAST, 67.64 FEET TO A POINT 39.27
FEET WESTERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 26; THENCE
AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTH 14° 34' 25" EAST, 1.00 FEET TO TfiE
BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY~ HAVZNG
A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET AND TO WHICH BEGINNING A RADIAL LINE
BEARS NORTH 14° 34' 35" WEST; THENCE SOOTHEASTERLY 24.41 FEET
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93° 14' 22" TO THE
BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AAVING A F.ADIUS
OF 18.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 7.11 FEET ALONG SAIll COMPOUND
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGL° OF 22° 37' 12"; THENCE SOUTH 11°
17' 09" WEST~ 20.06 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 14.98
FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22° 35' S5";
THENCE SOUTH 11° 18' 45° EAST, 27.90 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF
A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING ;~ RADIUS OF 1562.00 FEGT;
THENCE SODTHERLY 32.46 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 1° 11' 26" TO THE BEGINNING OF A CO6IPOUND CURVE
CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET; THENCE
SCUTHEASTERLY 15.39 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 23° 12' 04"; THENCE SOUTH 35° 42' 16" EAST~ 20.31
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING
A RADIUS OF 22.~0 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 8.21 FEET ALONG
SAZD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21° 23' O1" TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 26; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
LINES OF SAID LOTS 24, 25, AND 26, SOUTH 75° 25' 14" WEST,
111.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING AN AREA UF U.35 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
#0028r PC83-155
~,,
WHEREAS, L•he City Planning Commission di@ hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 7, 1983 at 1:30 p,m.,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accorrJance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of. all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
pzoperty from the CG (Commercial, General) zone to the CL (COmmercial,
Limited) Zone to construct a 2-story commercial office building.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
general commercial and/or medium density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the
community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject pruperty does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires
the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulatiun ElEmert
of che General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that .^.o correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
CG (COmmercial, General) 2one to the CL {Commercial, Limited) Zone to
construct a 2-story commercial office building on an irregularly-shaped parcel
of land consisting of approximately 0.35 acre located at the southwest corner
of Chestnut Strpet and Harbor Boulevard; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative Declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comr~ents received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment.
~2 PC83-155
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
i Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described pzoperty from the CG (Commercial, General) Zone to
the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone and to incorporate said described property
into the CL (Commercial, Limxted) Zon~ upon the following conditions which are
hereby founo tu be a necessary prere~uisite to the proposed use of subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the building shall be fire sprinklered as required by the City
of Anaheim Fire Uepartment.
Z• That street lightin9 facilities along Chestnut Street sh~ll be
modified as required by the Utilities General Manager in accordance
~ith specifications on file in the Office of Utilities General
Manager, and that security in the form of a bond, certificate of
deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City
to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the above-mentioned
improvements. Said security shall be posted with the City of
Anaheim prior to approval of building permits. The above-required
improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy.
3• That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4.
4• That prior to final buildii.g and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
1 and 3, abov?-mentioned, shal.l be complied with.
BE IT FURTHFR RESOLVED that tt~e A~idYlE1R1 City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
p~edicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. S~ould any such condition, or any oart thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOIivG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day
of Septembet, 1983.
~,~/Lw.....-
CHAiRMAN, A IEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
-~_,2 ~1 ~ ~ ! AL~~ ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3 PC83-155
_ ~,.~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris~ Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on
September 7, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE AND M_ BURNEY
IN WZTNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 7*_h day of
September, 1983.
//J~k/ ~ ~w~a ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC83-155