PC 83-176~--
RESOLUTION N0. PCA3•-176
A RESOLJTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 81-82-5 BE DENIED
WIiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from AMERICAN NAT.IONAL PROPERTIES, INC., P. O.
BOX 10077, Santa Ana, California 92711, ATTN: TERRY TWEEDT, owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
Cali£ornia, described as follows:
THOSE PORTIONS OE THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
'.CHE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC2IQN 26~
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST~ S.B.B. & M., IN THE RANCHO
SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ COONTY
OF ORANGE~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ AS PER MAP RECGRDED ZN BOOK
51 PAGE 7 OF M'tSCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGZNNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE UF SAID EAST HALF OF
SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER PF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER~ DZSTANT
THEREON NORTH 0° 02' 20" EAST 40.00 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF
SAID SECTION 26, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINB OF
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, 40.00 FEET WIDE, AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED
TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, RECORDED IN BOOK 231~ PAGE 230 OF
DEEDS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH
LINE D]ORTH 88° 41' 15" WEST 358.19 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL
WITEi AND DISTANT 2.00 FEET~ MEASURED AT RIC~IT ANGLES~ WEST
FROM THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT
N0. 3017~ AS PER MAP RSCORDED IN BOOK 138~ PAGES 15 AND 16
OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE
ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTEi 0° O1' 47" EAST 160.04 FEET;
TFIEI~CE NORTH 88° 41' 15" WEST 2.00 FEET TO SAID FAST LItIE OF
SAID TRACT N0. 3017; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND IT'S
NORTHERLY PROLONGATZON NORTH 0° O1' 47" EALT 491.57 FEET TO
A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL 2, AS PER :7AP FILED ZN
BOOK 62~ PAGE 5 OF PARCEL MAPS~ RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH d8° 4A' O1" EAST 308.18
FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MANCHESTER AVENUE, 47.00
FEET WIDE~ AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 6275; THENCE ALONG
SAID SOUTHWESTGRLY LINE SOUT[i 39° 30' 19" EAST 159.55 FEET
TO TfiE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 970.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARCLENGTH OF 80.76 FEET THROU(~i A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4° 46' 13'; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE
SOUTH 34° 44' 06" EAST 90.87 FEET TO T'dE BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
220.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AN
ARCLENG'PH OF 61.87 FEET THROUC~I A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16° 06'
49" TO A POINT ON SAID CURVE TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS
NORTH 71° 22' 43" EAST; THENCE NORT[i 88° 40' 28° WEST 177.84
FEET TO SAID AFOREMENTIONED EAST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF
SAID SOURHEAST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE
ALONG SAID EAST LIt3E SOUTH i)° 02' 20' WEST 339.90 FE£T TO
SAID NORTH LINE OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE AND POINT OF BEGINNING.
#0050r PC83-176
r,., ~„~
WHEREA5, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim ori Octoter 3, 1983 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provision~ of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewikh; and
WIiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
f ollowing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
property from the RS-A-43,000 (MEiP) (Residential, Agricultural (MObilehome
Park Overlay)) Zone to the C-R (Commercial kecreation) Zone, to permit
conversion of an existing 94-space mobilehome park.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
c~mmercial. recreation and/or medium-density resider.tial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification is hereby denied on the
basis that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby finds that the evidence
presented at the public hearing did not establish the existence of any of the
following findings of fact as set forth in Section 18.92.070 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, pertainin9 to removal of the (MHP) Overlay Zone, to wit:
a. That the proposed change of land use will not have an adverse
effect upon the goals and policies for preservation of housing
within the City of Anaheim as set forth in the Housing Element
of the Anaheim General Plan; or
b. That the proposed change of use is necessitated by the
underlying site conditions which pose a threat to the .life,
health, safety or general welfare of the mobilehome park
residents; or
c. That the proposed change of use is nec~ssitated by
circumstances beyond the ceasonable control of the owner of the
property; or
d. That denial of said reclassification would deprive the owner of
all reasonable or economically viable use of the property; or
e. That said reclassification is required by public necessity and
convenience and the general welfare.
4. That the proposed reclassification is hereby denied on the
basis that subject property is surrounded by residential uses, that it is
isolated from other commercial uses and has pooz access from the nearby
freeway and arterial streets.
5. That approximately 37 persons indicated their presence at said
public hearing in opposition; and that no currespondence was received in
opposition to subject petition.
#U050r PC83-176
r. r~
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That an EIR Negative Declaration was
previously approved on November .16, 1981, by the City Planning Commission in
conjunctzon with Rec~assification No. 81-82-5 and Conditional Use Permit No.
2259.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny Petition for Reclassi.fication on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOkEGOING RcSOLUTZON is signed and approved by me this 3rd day
of October, 1983
~~'a-%~. %f ~~-~---
CHAIRMAN, AI~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
!~r'
ATTEST:
`~~. ~.'_~~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannin9
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October
3, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERBST~ KING~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
October,
1983.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of
C~ ~JC/~1.. ~C. " G~~~
SECRET7IRY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
EC83-176
::,.,... ,~ ... ,-.
_ _ , ......
:i. . ~.. . . , . ~ . . . . .. .. . .