Loading...
PC 83-202~ ~', ;~ RESOLUTION NO. PC83-202 ,-.. A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CI'PY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR 4'?~RIAN(:E NO. 3356 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Variance from GARY M. SNODGRASS AND DEBORAH M. SNODGRASS, 6286 Camino Manzano, Anaheim, California 92807, owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California desctibed as: LOT 8 OF TRACT N0. 8082 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF~ RECORDED IN BOOK 366~ PAGES 8 AND 9 OF MISCELLANEGUS MAPS~ RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 17, 1983, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the Eollowing to construct a room addition: SECTION 18.27.062.020 - Maximum lot coverage (358 permitted; 43$ proposed) 2. That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby granted on the basis that the petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists in that there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shape, topog*aphy, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zuned properties in the vicinity; and that strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other oroperties in identical zoning classificatio^ in the vicinity. 3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. 4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. 6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition. #0073r PC83-202 _.._...~ ..-, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EINDING: The Planning Direchor or his authocized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within 'he definition of Categ~rical Exemptions, Class 5, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepace an EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditicns which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite '~n the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That plans shall be submitted to the Building Division showing compliance with the minimum standards of the City ~f Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by tha City of Anaheim. The appropria*.e permits shall be obtainad for any necessary work. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordznce with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3. 3. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition No. 2, above-•mentioned, shall be complied with. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any sur.h condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of c~mpetent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and Zny approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and voi.d. THE EOREGOING RESOLt)TION is signed and approved Uy me Ehis 17th day of October, 1983. ', ,~ `iJl..~.~ r.-~ /f -l7-t,r,G.-,t.. CHAIRWOMAN~ At1AHEIM CITY PLANNIN6 COMMISSION ATTEST: ~ SECRETAR , At7AEiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby cercify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission held on October 17, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, FRY, HERBST, KING~ LA CLAIRE, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE, MC BURNEY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of October, 1983. ~~ ~ .e~.~_ SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -Z PCS3-202 .... ,........... , ... ..