PC 83-240RESOLUTION NO. P~g3_Zq0
A RES~~LUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
T{!AT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 3368 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance f.rom ROBIN HILL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ATTN; MARTHA S.
SCHNIEDERS, 405 South Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90212, owner of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California described as;
TRACT NO. 10410, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOg 497,
PAGES 11~ 12 AND 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
the Civic Cenker ~int the C ty of nAnah im onSDecember h12a 19g3 blic hearing at
notice of said public hearing having been dul ' ~ at 1:30 p,m,,
accordance with the provisions of the Anahe m Mun c pal ode eaChapter 18a03n
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to
establish a 46-lot, 45-unit RS-HS-10,000(SC) single-family subdivision:
SECTION 18.24.061.020 - Minimum average lot width
(75 feeE required;
69 feet proposed)
basis thatZ.the That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby grai>ted on the
petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists in that there
are special circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically
zoned prc,perties in the vicinity; and that strict application of the Zoninq
Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in
identical zoning classification in the vicinity.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
4• That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5• That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
#Olllr
PC83-240
~
6. That one person indicated his presence at said public hearing
in favor; and that no cor.respondence was receive~ in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMEN'PAL IMPACT FINDING: Environmental Impact Report No. 218
was prepare~. in conjunction with Tentative Tract Nos. 10407, 10408, 10409 and
10410 and certified by the Anaheim City Planning Commission on August 28, 1978.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pretequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the approval of Tentative
Tract No. 11924.
2. That subject property shall be developed subscantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 11.
3. That prior to final buildinq and zoning inspections, Condition
No. 2, above-mentioned, shall be complied w~th.
BF IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Cemmission
does hereby find and d~termine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance w~th each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE EOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 12th day
of December, 1983. ~
~ 9~~ `: ~..,~/`~ll~ti~,
CHAIRWOMAN~~ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIVN
ATTEST: ,
~~ ~ ,~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_l_ PC83-240
STATE OF CALIEORNIA )
COONTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foreqoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on December
12, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C4MMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHURE~ FRY. HERAST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE~
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of
December, 1983.
~~~ ~ ~~~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_g_ PC83-290