PC 83-26,--., _
r•~.
RESOLUTION N0. PC83-2G
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHCIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT P~TITION POR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2373 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit °rom IBERHAM AI,I ATA, 26371 Avery Parkway,
Mission Viejo, California 92675 and TALAT RADWAN, 26371 Avery Parkway, Mission
Viejo, California 92675 & AL SERRATO, 2901 South Rene Drive, Santa Ana,
California 92704, agents of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State af California, described as:
THE SOUTH 160 FEET OF THE EAST 115 FEET OF LOT 67 OF
TRACT NO. 2773, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 115~
PAGES 24~ 25, AND 26 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OP
SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on February 7, 1983 at ::30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by luw and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence £or and against said proposed conditional use
p~rmit and to investigate and malce findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigaticn and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offer.ed at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1• That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Nunicipal Code Section 18.03.030.010 to
wit: to permit the addition of a convenience market to an existing gasoline
service station.
z• That the proposed use is hereby denied on the basis that the
size and shape of the site is not adequate to accommodate the dual commercial
uses as proposed.
3• That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be
located.
4• That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the ful.l development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5• That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will be detrimentaZ to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6• That the traffic generated by the proposed use will impose an
undue burden upon the streets and hic~hways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area.
#04732
PC83-26
,
--, .-~
7. That 6 persons indicated their presence at said public hearing
in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: An EIR Negative Declaration was
previously approved by the Planning Commi.ssion on October 4, 1982 and by the
City Council on November 2, 1982 in conjunction this Conditional Use Permit
No. 2373 when it was previously considered and denied.
NOt4, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, en
the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day of
February, 1983.
c'~° ~l~l~
hA 9AN~ ANAHEIM CITY P ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETAR , ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OE' ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certiPy that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February
7, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CGMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBSi, KING~ LA CLAIRE~
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 2 have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of
February, 1983.
~~ ~. .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-z- PC83-26