PC 83-6r'~.
RESOLUTION NO. PC83-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATZON NO. E32-83-14 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from pONALD 6 HARRZETT STRICKLAND, 4570 Campus
Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660, owners, and BILL PHELPS, 1259 North
Batavia, Orange, California 92667, agent of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follows:
BEGINNING AT ThE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TH~ WESTERLY 4,500
ACRES OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIHED PARCEL OF LAND:
SEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2$ OF "ANAHEIM
EXTF.TiSION" AS SHOWN ON A MAP MADE BY WILLIAM HAMt~L, ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTy, CALIFORNIA; THENCE WESTERLY AI,ONG THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT, 786.90 FEET TO A POINT 378.75 FEET
EASTERLY OF THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 28; THENCE
SOUTHF,RLY, PARAI,LEL TO TifE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 442
~EEP: THENCE EASTERLY pARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT, 786.90 FEET TO A POINT ON iHE EASTERLY LINE OF
SATD LOT; THENCE NORTHERT,Y ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 442
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING NORTH 74° 27' 39" EAuT,
ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 28, IDENTICAL W=TH THE
CENTERLINE OF VERMONT AVEN[JE (FORMEFtI,y BROAD STP.EET) A
~ISTANCE OF 58.60 FEE'C MORE OR LRSS TO THE r7ESTERLY LIt1E GF
THE EASTERLY 284.75 FEET OF SAID LOT 28; THENCE SOUTH 15°
48' 00" EAST, ALONG SA2D WESTERLY LINE, 204.50 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 74° 27' 30" WE.^•T, PARALLEL WITH SAID Cfi'NTER LINE OF
VERMONT AVENUE, 59.26 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE
EASTERLY LINE OF THE AFORESAID Wgy~gg~,y 4,500 ACRES; THENCE
NORTH 15° 37' 00" WEST, ALONG LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE
204.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF HEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING ~~ITHIN THE RIGHT OF
WAY OF VERMONT AVENUE. „
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January 10, 1983 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public heazing having Ueen duly given as required by law a~id in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 16.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings a~td recommendations in connection
therewith; and
#0416I
PC83-6
WHEREAS, said Commission, Zfter due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and aPter due consideration of all
evidence and repor.ts offered at said hearing, does find and dFter.mine the
followinq facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) zone to the RM-1200
(Residential, Multiple-Fanily) zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
commercial recreation and/or medium-density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject progerty is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the
conmanity.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zone~ and their permitted uses
generally establishe•3 throughout the co~nunity.
5. That t.ie proposed reclassification of subject property requires
the improvement of at~itting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
qenerated by the intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was receired in opposition to subject
petition.
ENyIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commiasion has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
Rc,_p-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) zone to the RM-1200 (Residential,
~IuZtiPlP-c~.2f2y1 =Qae on a rectar,yular.Iy-ui~ape3 parcel of land consisting of
approxfmately 0.23 acre, having a frontage of approximately 58 feet on the
south side of Vermont Avenue, and beinq located approximately 286 feet west of
~e centerline of Harbor Boulevard (522 West Vermont Avenue); and does hereby
approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no 3ignificant
individual or cumulative advarae environmental impact due to the approval of
this Negative Declaration since the Anahei~r General Plan designates the
subject property for commercial recreation and/or medium density residential
land uses commensurate with the proposals that no sensitive environmental
impacts are involved in the proposalt that the Initial Study submitted by the
petitioner indica*_es no significant indivi3ual or cwnulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the
foregoing findinga is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planninq
Cor.¢ni8sion does hereby qrant aubject Petftion for Reclassification and, by so
doing~ that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-describad property from the RS-A-+3,OOU (Residential,
aqricultural) zor.e to the RM-1200 !Residential, Multip2e-Family) 2one upon the
followinq conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proPosed use of subject pr~perty in order to preserve the safety and
generul welfare uf the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
'2' PC83-6
,_. ~
1. That sidewalks shall oe installed along Vermont Avenue as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications or. file in the office of the City Engineer.
2• That street lighting facilities along Vermont Avenue shall be
installed as required by tlie Office of Utilities General Manager, and
in accordance with specifications on file in the Of`:~.ce of the
Utilities General M::nager -nd/or that security in the fornt of a bond,
certificate of deposit, letter of credit or cash, in an amount and
form sati~factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the satisfactory installation of the
above-mentioned improvements. ~aid security shall be posted with the
City prior to approval of building permits. The above-required
improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim a Eee, in an amount as determi.ned by the City Council, for
tree planting purposes along Verntont Avenue.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved nians on file with the Office of the ~xecutive Director of
Public ~7orks.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
7. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the
building permit is issued.
8. That the owner(s) of a.xbject property shall pay the traf£ic signal
assessment fee (~rdinance No. 3896), ir. an amount as determined by
the City Council, for each new dwelling unit prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Office of
Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior
to the issuance of a buildinq permit.
10. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as req~uired and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior
to coaunencement of structural frami.ng.
11. That prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that
the proposed project is :.n conformance with Council Policy No. 542,
Sound Attenuation in Residential Projects.
12. That subject property shall be developel substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file witti the City of Anaheim marlced
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
-3 PC83-6
,~
adS ~
~'^•,
'Ji:
~t'r:.
F~~'
~;:2:' 13. Thdt prior to
~;~ the introduction of an ordinance
;.~ property, Condition Nos. 2 and rezonin
completed. The 3. above-mentioned g Sub~ect
,;`' provisions or rights anted b ~ shall be
become nu11 and voi3 b `n Y this resolution shall
conditions are Y action of the Planning Commisaion unless
~, such further timemasied with within one year from the satd
the Planning Commission ma date hereof, or
~'f Y gx'ant.
s:i 14• That Condition Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6 and
complied with prior to final Suildin lZ' above-mentioned
g and zonin ~ Shall be
:. g inspections.
~'' ~ IT FURTHER REgpLVED
i~ hereby find that the Anaheim City Plannin
predicated and determine that adoption of this g CO~ission
upon applicant s Resolution fs does
1 compliance wi!-h each expressly
~ hereinabove set forth. Should an " and all of the
declared invalid or Y such condition conditions
unenforceable '°r anY P~'t thereof, be
competent jurisdiction, th~n by the final judgement of
contained, shall be this Resolution any ~~•~urt ap
deemed null and void. ' and any approvals here3n
T::E F.OREGOING RESULUTION is signed and approved b
of Januar~-, 1983.
y me this lOth day
CH ,AN, AN IM C~ PL
ATTEST: SNG COMMISSION
~~~~ 1 ~,.'t..~_
SECRETARY, ANAF~g=M CIrY pLANN2NG COMMISSION ~
s
STATE OF Cp1,IFp~IA ~ ~
COUNTY OF ~
ORANGE ) s•y.
CITY OF }~~EIM ~ f
r
~
x. Editli L. Harris, Secretary of
Comm?.ssion, do hereby certif the Anaheim
ado ted Y that the foregoin City Planning
P at a meeting of the Anaheim Cit g resolution was passed and
10, 1983, by the followin Y Planning Coutmission
g vote of the members thereof: held on January
AYES: ~,
COMMISSIpNERS; BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, ~T7G~ J~ C~2~
MC B[7gNgy
NOES: COMFLZSSIONEI2S; NONE ~ t~ '
AHSENT: COMMI~SIONERS: NONE f
IN WITNESS WHEI2EOF, 2 Have hereunto set
January, 1983. my hand this ZOth day of
. ~ . ~
SECRET,9I~ ~ pN~gIM CITY p
LANNING COMMZSSION ~