PC 83-65RESOLUTION N0. PC83-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2411 BR GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ARTHUR B. WILMSEN TROST BANK OF
AMERICA, P, p. IIox 7980, Plewport Beach, California 92660, ATTN: PAUL POPMA-
Senior Trust Officer, and ATLANTIC RICHPIELD COMPANY, ATTN: C. V. HICKS, 300
West Glenoaks Boulevard, Glendale, California 91202, agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, desczibed as:
THE SOUTH 2O0.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200.00 FEET OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 10
WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, CITY OF
ANAHEIM~ CUUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THE WEST 53.00 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 53.00 FEET THEREOF.
SAID LAND IS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED I~~ BOOK 43 PAGE 26 OF
RECORD OF SURVEYS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 4, 1983, at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as requit•a by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipa? ~ode, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed c~nditional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following Eacts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.03.030.010 to
wit: to retain a convenience retail sales in an existing service station.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted subject to the
petitioner's stipulation that the items to be sold at this site shall be
limited to gum, packages of candy and mints, packaged nuts and seeds, candy
hars, fruit juices (glass and cans), soda, chips (i.e., Fritos), coof;ies and
cakes; and that the retail sales area shall be limited to 200 square feet.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is Froposed
to be located.
#0562I PC83-65
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
oetrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
condition~ imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no cocrespondence was r.eceived in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRUNMENTAL ZMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has ceviewed the proposal co retain convenience retail sales in an
existing service station on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting
of approximately 0.50 acre located at the northeast corner of La Palma Avenue
and State College Boulevard, and further described as 1000 North State College
Boulevard (ARCO M. P. & G.); and does hereby approve the Negati.ve Declaration
from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis
that `here would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general
commeccial land uses commansurates wich the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are ir,volved in the proposal; that the Initi.al Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaratiort
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim
Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pretequisite
to the proposed use of the subject propecty in order to preserve the safety
an~9 general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the existing most southerly driveway on State College Boulevard
and the existir.g most westerly driveway on La Palma Avenue shall be
removed and ceplaced with a standard curb, gutter, sidewalk and
landscaping.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
wirh plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 with a maximum retail sales area of 200
square-feet.
3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed
within a period of 40 days from the date of this resolution.
4. That tha retail sale of alcohclic bevecages (including beer and wine)
shall not be rermitted in conjunction with this use.
-2- PC83-65
.T,
5. That items to be sold at this site shal]. be limited to gum, packages
of candy and mints, packaged nuts and seeds, candy bars, fruit juices
(glass and cans), soda, chips (i. e., Fritos), cookies and cakes.
BE IT FURTHSR RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RE50LUTION is signed and approved by me this 4th day of
April, 1983.
',~, {J
~,/~,c,..~ „~,~/au-w~ -
CfiAIRi9F1~1; PRO TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
`~OLX~(~ „L° G~f7~JUl~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meetinq of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on April 4,
1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, HERB5T, KING, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY
IN WITN~SS WHEREO^, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of
April, 1983.
~~ ~ ~,~.A,~.,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CI'PY PLANNING COMI9ISSION
_3_ PC83-65