PC 83-69~ -,
R.ESOLU'PION NO. PC83-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFZCATION N0. 82-83-27 BE GRANTBD
WHEREAS, the Anahe°_m City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from PAUL T. SALATA, 2950 Airway, D-3, Costa
Mesa, California 92626, owners, and STATE-WIDE DEVELOPERS, .NC., 5182 Katella
Avenue, Suite 106, Los Alamitos, California 90720, agent, of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, desctibed as follows:
THS NOR1'hEAST QUARTER OF THE 50UTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSSIP 4
SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES~ AS SHOWN ON A
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNTA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission ~9id hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on March 2.1, 1983 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said propo~ed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said public hearing having been continued co the Planning
Commission meeting of April 4, 1983; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That tYe petitio~,er pr6pGSES reclassiEication of subject
property from RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) Zone to the RM-3000
(Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim Genera~ Plan designates subject property for
medium-density reyidenti~l and commercial, professional land uses.
.i. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the
community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established L•hroughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires
the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the :.'irculation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
qenerated by ;ne intensification of land use.
#0565I PC&3-69
~
S;a' 6. That no, one indicated their presence at the April 4, 1983 public
.n
hearing ir, opposition and 8 persons in~~icated their presence at the March 21,
1983 public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in
.7~:;- opposition ta subject petition.
~7; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: Environmental Impact Report No. 247
{~;' was previously certified by the City Council on December 8, 1981, in
:; conjunction with General Plan Amendment rlo. 166. The EIR considered the
y,:;; maximum permissible density under the medium density cesidential land use
?<;:, designation (36 d.u./ac.) established by the GPA. The proposed
~`•~ - reclassification has a density which is less than the maximum
~'r.,; GPA. permitted by the
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Yetition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that 4~itle 18-2oning of the Anaheim t4unicipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described property from RS-A-43,000 (Residential,
Agricultural) Z.7e and to incorporate said described property into the RM-3000
(Residential, M~ltiple-Family) ~one upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject
property in order to pceserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim:
1•
' That street lighting facilities along Knott Street shall be installed
as required by the Office of iltilities General Manager, and in
i. accordance with specifications on file in the Office of Utilities
~: General Manager; and/or that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter
of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
i Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation
, of the above-mentioned requirements prior to occupancy.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the Streel- Maintenance and Sanitation
Division.
3• That prior to commencement of structura2 framing, fice hydrants shall
be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary
by the Chief of the Fire Department.
' 4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6. That in the event subject property is to be divided for the purpose
of sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map to record the approved
division of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by
the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
7. That prior to issuance of a building pprmit, appropriate park and
recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
am,~unt as determined by the City Council.
8. That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of
Kinysway Avenue and t4yra Avenue as required by the City Engineer.
-2` PC83-69
9. T~~at all private streeL-s shall be developed in accordance with the
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 122 for private str.eets,
including installation o£ street name signs. Plans for the private
street lighting, as re~;uired by the standard detail, shall be
submitted to the Building Division for approvsl and included with
the building plans pcior to tbe issuance of buildinc: permits.
(Private streets are those which provide pritt,ary access and/or
circulation within the project.
10. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for each new dwelling unit .
11. That prior to issuance of building permits, the ~^.pplicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that
the residential units will be in conformance with Noise Insulation
Standards specified in the California Administrative Code, Title 25.
12. That prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that
the proposed project is in conformance with Council Policy Number
542 "Sound Attenuation in Residenti.al Projects".
13. That a 6-foot high masonry block wall shall be constructed along the
north, we~t and south property line(s) and/or that a bond in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to guarantee the installation of said wa.ll prior to
final building inspection.
14. That a median island shall be installed on Knott Street adj:~cent to
subject property. The design of said median island shall be subject
to the review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
15. That appropriate notice be provided to all future buyers and tenants
that the property is subject to the sight, sound, and over-flight by
aircraft utilizing Armed Forces Reserve Center, Los Alamitos.
16. That all structures shall conform to the height criteria contained
in Federal Administrative Regulations part 77. Evidence of said
compliance shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building petmit.
17. That the proposed project shall not emit excessive glare or light,
nor produce steam, smok~, dust, or electronic interference so as to
endanger aeconautical operations.
18. That an Aviation Easement over the property be granted to the Armed
Forces Reserve Center, Los Alamitos.
19. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. 1, 13 and 18, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisio~s or rights granted by this resolution
shall become null and void by action of the Planning Commission
unless said cor.,3ii:ions are complied with within one ~ear from the
date of this resolution, or such further time as the Planning
Commission may grant.
-3- PC83-69
~1r.:
"` 20, That prior to final buildinq and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
,,;; 2, 4, 5, 8 and 14, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
`'`~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVRD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
~'' does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicatPd upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
`~~; hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
f'• declared invalid or unenforceable b the final g y
~r:, Y jud ement of an court of
~;i;i competent jurisdiction, then this Resol.ution, and any approvals herein
~,~~ contained, shall be deemed null and void.
~`~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ar,~ approved by me this 4th day
~a of April, 1983.
~!~i
~% :
,:., A- ~r~~ ~~~.
° CH~AI AN, AFAHEIM CIT ~PLANNING COMMISSIUN
,~,:1
'~+ ATTEST:
'' ~~. .~° ~~,~ ~, , -
„ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COhIMISS20N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the fcregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Ylanning Commission held on April 4,
1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST~ KING, LA CLAIRE,
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSI!~NERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of
April, 1983.
,~l.~c~ x-~ ~„ ,~ .~.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC83-u9