PC 84-103Fik~~'~ ~ Y . --
i~ `~ R
TA,~' 6
ti ~'.
t'{ti'•
Y::: , ~
1~i'~.,~:; i ~~'~isU~
~ ' i UTTON N0. ~ 103
,,~~;:~ k C B 4 -
~iM1',,r',;,<J --------=----
fq~ ,.. j A RESOI~U'i'IUN Of~' ~'HE ANAHGIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
°~', ;:; ~,CHAT .PL;TI:I'ION 1~O.R VARIANCE NO. 340p 13E DENI~D
,l;,s
fi `':
WHk;REAS, the Anaheirn City P.lannii~g Commiss:ion did recei,ve
~ ! Pctit.ion £ur Variai~ce Fr~m SAN
Hunt~.ington k3cach, CalifoKnia 92g~~ R~ UE a verif:ied
l~~.~;'~ Q, INC~, 16902 ~olsa Chica~ #203
' the Ci.ty of Anah~im, Ccunt.y of. Orange,y State of al fornia ~r~~er.t '
~ Y situated .in
descr~ibed as;
,~ PaF;CEL 1:
~'~ H£ ~ORDED ~N1,0'BOUK O 78 ~P,ApAGES ~ 215$ 7, AS Sf10WN pN A
~ TO Zg MAP
;;; MISC,~LLANEOUS MAPS ~ TNCLUSIVE
~~',;: : , RECOk~DS O.E OHAN~~: COUN'1'Y C1F
~;,~, , , CA.LI['ORS~IA.
~~~"'' ~j~L~~A~, L-he C.ity Plann.ing Co.mmission d.id hold a
;;~~v ~ C.i,vic Cent~r ~in the City of Anaheim on Ma 30 ~
~' pub1~.G hear.ing at the
!~~', ~! ya~~ ~~ublic hearing havi.ng beEri du~ ~' r 1984, a~. 1:30 p.m. ~ noti.ce of
~~':.`'~ wi.th the Y 9iven as r.e
w' ' p'c~vi.sions of tY~e ~nah~im Munic.ipa] Code, r haptera~laa03,'' todccor.~ance
4``~i consi.der. avidence for and against said pr.oposed var.iance
i ' hear and
,~;,;, make findings and recomanendations in cotinect.ion therewith, ~nd ~~ t~~vPStigate and
i~' ~
''; WH~KEA~, said c:~mmission, after. ~
'.,~, + study made b du~ l.t]SiJC'CE ~011~ i.nvestigation and
evxdence andy reports c ffer d~at sa.id1fheaxLa afl-er due considexation of
~ ~ all
, following facts; n~, does find and
i
determine the
Y;.
'~;j 1. That the pet~it.i.oner 1-d
'} block wal.l and swimmin ~ Aoses waiver.s of l•he follok~ng to r~tain a
; 9 pool:
r 1~
(a) SEC~rIONS 18.O~1o043.101
18,~23 0 0 _
AND 1f3.23.064.070
(b) SECTIUN 1~3~pG3.011 •
- Max.imtxm fence heiqht.
!3 Eeet permitted in front
5,5 ~~et exi.sting) Yaxd;
M_inimum front vard setb_ack.
(25 ft• r.equired; 1,4 ho 32 ft.
-_______...r e x i s t~ n g)
2• That the above-m~;~ti,oned wai~~ers ar.e
that ther.e are n~ special ci.rcurn~ anceN a ~ereb
t " pplicable to the prpperhd ~n the b~~si,s
Sh~Pe, topogrdphy, ~o~~~lon and surzoundings wk~ich do not
i.denticall zoned Y such as si.ze,
y p~oP~zty .ir. the same v:icinit ~pP1Y to orhez
the Zona.ng Code doea no~ deprive the y% and that s~ri~1: a
P~'opeKti.es in th~ p~'operty d£ K~plication of
identi.cal zone and ~].assi.Fzcation p n Vthe9vic ntty eand subject
to Interdepaztmental i.omm.ittee recommer~dations.
3• mhat ther.e are no exceptiona:l cr: extr.~-~pr.dznar. ~.
cond.ita.on , appiicable to the Y circum: _ances nK
pt~p~r.ty that do ~iot a proper.ty involved ~r to rhE :intended use of the
vicinity and zone, ppl~ yenerally to the pz~pErt~, or Class of use in the same
4• That the r.~~qUeUt~d ~~riancc~ is not necessnry for the preser.vation
and enjoyment of a substant.ial pr.operty right;
s~mp viciri.ity and zone, and denied to the pzO~,~ ty ~ ns~d by other
property i.n the
question.
#0231r
P84-103
~t~
~
~
5.
tkie ~ubl.ic That
w~lEar
e the requesi:ed var. ianc~
r
i wi.ll ae mat~ri.ally detr, i.mental ~o
v:icini~.y and .
zone in .
o
njur. ~ous to the
which lh pr.oper.ty o1- improv~me~lts i,n such
~ pKOper.ty is locatcd.
6. That iott-,- persr~ns indi.caterl their. pr.esenc~ ai: sa:id publi.c
hear.ing i.n opposiL-:ion; and that one ].etter was r.ec~~iv~d in apposit.i.on to
subject petition.
GNVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FTNDING: The Planni.ng Dir.er.tor. or hzs
authorizec~ represer~tativ~ h~s det~rmi.ned that ~he .,
within ~he ~efinition oE Categorical Exemptions, Clas~~5p~ as def~nedt in atl~ie
~tai;e EIR Gui.delines and is, thecefor.e, c:ateyqrically exempr from the
requi.rement tu prepar.e an .ETR.
NUW, THEREFrJ12E, BE IT RESpLVED thak the Anaheim City Planning
Commiss:ion does hereb,y deny subject: Petit.ion Foz Variance on Lhe basi.s of the
a~torementianEd f a.ndi.ngs o
THE FOItFUOTNG RESOLUTION is signed and approvec7 by me ~hi.s 30th day
of May, ~y8~}.
: !~7,~ ~
/~~c:~' ~c_ • .~-~ --,x-..~-.~'zL..~.~
CHATRWOMAN, ANA~F IM CTTy PLANNING COMMISSZON
ATTES'.P ;
~ l,~ i1 .
.c ~
SECRETARY, ANt~fiEIM CITY PLANN:[NG COMMTSSION
STATG UF C;ALIFQFtiVIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGF ) SS~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Editl.~ ~,. Hazris, Secretar.y ~a~ the Anaheim City Planning
Conunissioti, do hereby c~rtiiy that khe toregoing r.zsolution was ~assed and
adapted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May .30,
1984, by the .Eollowing vote o~ the member,s thpr.eof:
AYES: COI~IMISSIONE;FtS: ~3USHORE~ ~RY, KIN~, LA ~LATRE
NOES: COMMISSIC~NERS; BUUAS, HERBST
ABSEN`r: CGt9MISSIONFRS: MC BUKNEY
IN WITNESS WHEREOE', I have hereunto set my l~and th.is 30th day oi
May, 1984.
~ r~,c...~ ,~~..~ .
~~
~ECRE'1'AkY~ ANAHEIM CI~'Y PLANNING COMMISSION