PC 84-117; ~'~
Rk,SULU'PiUN NU. YC84-1.] 7
A I~ESOT~U'1'IUN OE~ ',P,HE; ANl#E1L:iM CI'i'Y E~LANNING CQMMTSSION
7'f!A'1' PL'1'I'.i'ION E'GR RECLASS:[L'.T.CA2'TOPI N0. E33-6~-26 F3E nE;NiE;D
WHLR~,AS, L!,e Anah~im Cii:y ~'1ann~ing Gommission dic] r.e~ei.v~ ~ ver{fied
petittcn for. kec].assi~ica~ion f.rom GArlY. tl. EIUNTk;R, E`P At~., 3l5 L. North
Sl-.re~t, F~nah~im, Cal.iior.nia 928U5r owner. oF cer.tr3in r.ca.l. pr.uperty si.tuater] i.n
the Ci~y oE Anaheim, County oE Oranye, S~atc oi: C~~l.i.furnia, descr.i.bed as
Eol.].ows:
I,0'.P 1.0, F3LUCK 3 UE' '.CRAC'L' 304 AS I~I;R MAP RECORUED TN }300K 1.4
PAGL 50 UL•' MI5CELI~ANEOUS MA~~S, RECC)RAS OF ~AID c:OUN'I'.Y. AND
STATE.
WH~;f2E;AS, the Ci~y Pl.anni.ng Cotnmi.ssi.on di.d hold a pub] i.c hear. tng at
the ~i.vic C~nter. i.n the City of Anahe.im on Apr.i.l. 3Ur 1.9a~ a~ 1:30 p.m., noti.Ce
of said pubJ.ic hear.ir.~,~ having been dul.y yi.ven as regui.r.ed by ].aw and •.in
acco!:dance with the pr.ovisions o£ ttie Anaheim Municipa] Code, ChaN'ter. 1.6.03,
to hear and ca~sider. evi.dence for. and ag~inst :~a.id pr.oposed r.ecl.assificakion
and kp investigate and make f l[1CIy ~1C~5 and C~CUITIIiI@T1dil~1.U[1S' i n connec:ttnn
tt~erewith; sa.id publ.~c hearicig t~aving been conti.nued ta the meeting of June
25, J.9F4; anci
WHEREAS, said Commission, after, due inspP~~tton, investtgation Znd
study made by itsel.i' and in its behal.f, ~znd after. due cons~lderation ut a] 1.
r:v:idence and repor.ts ~Efer.ed at saia hear.ing, doe:, f.ind and deter.mtne thE
fol.l.owiny facts:
].. That tkie petitioner, pr.oposes r.ecl.a~sificarinn oE subject
~ropertl from the RS-720U (Fte~iciential., Sinyl.e-Famil.y) 7.one to the FtM-2~00
(~esideritiaJ., Mul.ti~l.e•-Family) or. a].t~ss inten.e zone.
2. That rhe Anahf~im Gen~~r.al. P1an desi.g~~atec subjec* pr.oper.ty f~r.
medium c9ensity Cesidentia) land uses.
3. That the pr.opo~ed r.ecl.assi.fi.cation of sub~ect prop~rty is not
necessac,y nor. deai.rabl.e for. k:he or.derl.y ~nd pr.oper d~avelo~ment of. the
commun.ity.
q. That the prop~sed r.ecl.as~ification of sub;ject proper.ty does not
~rop~rl.y r.e.late to the zones and ~hei.r ~er.m~.tted use~ l.ocal.l.y Pstabl.ishcd i.n
cl.ose proximi.ty to ~ubject pc~per.ty and to the 2ones and theic ~erm.itted uses
yeneral.3.y establ.ished thr~ughnut the corr~munity. •
~i. `rh~t thr.ee pervon~ truli.cated thei.r pr.~~sence at sai~ p~bl.ic
heatiny in oppositton; and that petf.tions contai.niny approxi.matel.~ T.2
stgnatuKe~; and one ].ett~:c wer.e r.tcetved at the A~ri.l 30, ] 98G meet,tng in
opposition to s~ibject petitiun; anc~ that a petttton cont.~in~.ng ~i.x !6)
~ignak~~e:~ wa~ r.ecei.vcad tn favar at tt~e June 25, i984 meeti.ng.
ENViRUNN~EM'1'I~L_ IMF?ACT eINDTNG: ':'hat the Anaha{n, (;i.ty P1 anni.ng
~:ommissi~on has revtewFd the ~r.oposa.l. cc~ rec:lassifv sub~ect pcoperty Pr.om the
R5-7200 (Residenttal, Sing.te-['ami.ly) 7,one to the i2M-2900 (Re~idPnttal,
Mul.tip),e-Family) c-r a l.es~ int~nse zone :an~ to conver.t an ex~.stiny
P~84-1.17
~0245r
,
^
,~ ~
s.i,nglcwt~-miJ.Y .~trucL-u-:~ and det~-ched gar.age int-.o a dup].ex ~vil:h waivers o:F
mintmum type o~ par.ki.ng spaces, m~nimum s~ide yar.d ::~el-tiack ancl m~.nimum width of
pedesCr.i.an accessway on a~ectangular:].y--shaE~ec]r P~C~~-~ °r~x~i~na~i.e.l.yn52Gf~~ on
aj~~roximate].y 7it3U ~quarc~ feet haviiig a£r~11~~~~= °L app ..
thc~ nar.~h side of Nor.th Str.cer., an~9 fur.ther, de~cr~b~-'d a~ 31.5 rast Nor.th
Streeti; and ciaes her.tb,y approv~ th~: N~gative Decl.a~ation u~on ~inding that i.r
izas consider.eii the Negati.~~e Uec]ar.ation to~tther w'•tY- ~-ny nomments received
during the publ ic r.evi.ew ~'~ ~c~received ~tnat ~theren~i:~n no~sub,ttan~.ia.l.~ev den~:e
tnttial. study and any commenta
that the pr.oje::t w~ 1.J. ha~~e a~~.9ni.Picant eL-.EGc~ r~n th~ envir.onmt~nt.
NOW, TH~12E;['OfiE, BG IT R~SOLVGD thaL tt~e An~he.im City P1.anning
Commissior~ does hcr.eby deny P~:Littori for. Rc:cl.assification on thc basis ot tt~e
afor.en-entioned fin~~.ngs•
TEiE FOREG~ING RE50LUTION is sigrter,I and approvh~i bY Ri~ thi, 2Shh day
of ,]une, J.9~4. ) ./
'~ ~ll,l-r ~~`~l~'~~sZ.~
CHAI:RWOMAN, ,~ ~ AH~:IM CITY F'LANNxNG COMMI5SION
AT'P~ST :
~ ` !~ ~" ~ ~j~ -
SECR~TAFt ~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANP~ING COMb1ISSlON
STAT~ UF CALIFORNIA )
COUN~'Y UF ORAN'~E ) S~ •
CITY OF ANAHuIM )
I, Edith L. Har.ri,, S2r.r.~tar.y of t:he I,nahe~.m City PJ-anni.ny
ComMissiun, do he~eby cextity t.hat the Lore~ao~ttg r.es~luti.on was passed and
adopled at a meeting of the Analieim Ci.ry Planning Commission ;~et.d on :tune 25,
].989, by the fol.lowiny vote of the members ther.eof:
AYEa: COMMIS~IONERS: BOt1AS, $USH~RE, I'P.X~ HERT35T, I{ING, LA CLAIRE
MC BURNEY
NUES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE
ABSENT: (:OMNiISSTON}:RS: NI~N~
June, ].984.
WiTNE5S WHERCOE, I have hereutt~o aet my hand this 25th ci-ay of
~ ~ ..~~.~_
, _____
SF:~:RE'CAHYr ANAF?EIM CITY. PLAN~+jNG CUMMiSSION
-~-
PC64-l)7