PC 84-118~ ,;,
~
~
~
~
l~E;>.iULU`.CTUN NU. E'C3h-l.1.~3
A 12ESOGU'.l'ION U1 '1'(•IE ANI~HE'IM CITY I~LANNTNV CUMMtSSION
~'HAT .E'E'1'T`.CIUN ['OFt VAFtTANCE NU. 33):3 I3a [)ENIED
4JHEFcEAS, the Anah~im Cit.y l?].~nn.ing CommiasLOil d~.d r.eceive a ver. i.fi.ed
Pstit~~.on Eur Var.iance troii~ GARX H. HUI~'i'~k, ET }1L., 3J.`~ East Nor.th Str.e~~L-,
Anaheim, CaJ.i.tor.nia 928U5, own~c a~ cer.Lai.n r.wa.l. proE~er.i;y si.kuated ~.n ti~e Cit,y
of Anah~.im, County of Orange, Si:ate oi Cal.i.i'or.n.i,a descr. i.k.~ed as:
Lp7.` :lU, BLO~:K 3 OF '.rRAC:'r 30~ AS PGR MAP :2ECUFtDGD TN Ei00K l.9
PAGG 5U OL' MISC~;LLANEUUS MAPS, R~CORll5 OE' SAID COUNTY AND
~TATE.
WHF:~REAS, the c:ity ~].anning ~ommi.s.~ion did h4J.d a put,lic heari.ng at
the Civic Center in the Cit:y o£ ~'~nahei.m on Apr. i.l. 30, ].984, at .l: 30 p.m. ,
natzce oF sa.'td gubl.ic h~ar.ing having been r.~uly ,yiven as r.equir.ed by law and in
accoxdance with the p rovi~.ions of l-.hE Anahei.m Muni.c~ i.pa7. C~de, Chapter 1.8.03,
to hear. and consider evi.denc:e For. and agai.nst sai.d pr.op~sed v,~r. iance an~i ~o
investigate and mafce f.indings and r.ecommc~nda tions i.n conr~ecti.on therewir.h;
szxd pubJ.ic hearxng havi.ng been cont~~.nued to the Pl.anning Comrn:tssion meeting
of June 25, 1984; and
WHERFAS, said Commission, after due ir,spection, investigati.on and
study m~de by itsel.f and i.n its behalf, and a£ter due consider.ation of aJl.
evi.dence and repur.ts o~fer.ed at sai.d hc:ar.ing, does ~ind and determine the
foll.owinry Fac~s:
(J.; 'r}iat the pet:~ioner propose~ wa.iver.s of rr,e fu].J.owin5 to co[iver.t an
existing single-tamil.y stru~~tt-re and der,achec~ yar.age into a dupl.ex:
(a) SECTIONS 18.06.0~O.Ol.2l. - t7inimum tyye of par.kinq spaces
AND 1.8.32.066.U~.0_ (4 coverec3 spaces r.equir.ed; l encJ.os~d
proposed)
(b) SEC'~~ONS 18.~32.063.022 - M?.ni.mum sidt var.d set~a~k
AND 18.32.U63.U23 (5 Lo 9 fe~t cequir.~d; 3 to 4 fett
propcsed)
(c) S~CTION 18.32.065.020 - Mini.mum wi.cith of Pede ~tri.an ac~esswa
(8 feeti r.equi.red; 3 anc~ 4 feet propo~ed)
2. 7'hat the above-menti~ned wa:iver. ( a) i.s her.'eby denied on the
basis Chut the parkir-g vaeiance wi.ll cause an i.n~:r.Pase i.n ~r.affic congest:y.on in .
the immedtate vicinity and advers~l.y aifect ai7y adjoining ].and uaes; and
grantiny the parking variance wi.1]. be ~9etr.i.mental to the peace, hea7.th, s~tety
~r gener.al wel.tar.e of the c~.ti.zens of khe Ctty ot Anahei.m.
3. That the above:-mentic~ned waiver.s (b) and (c) ar.e her.eby denied '
on the bas~s that thEr.e ar.e no spectal c~~rcumstances appt~cable to thE proper.ty
such ~is size, sha~,~e, r.of~ogr.a~hy, l.ocal:ton oc sur.r.oundings, wh~ch do not appl.y
to oCher, i.dentical I.y zaned pr.oper. ti.es in the vici.nit,y; and ~tr. tck app] icati.on
of the Zoning Code doe~ noL• dcpri.ve the proper.ty o.f privil.eyes enjoyed by other.
praperti.es tn identtcal. zoning cl.a~~iftcati.on in the vici.ni.ty. ~
NCf34-]..1.8
pU2~6r
,~
4~ Thal: ~2ecl.as;;i.ficat,i~n Na. ~i3-84-2G, to r.ezonEa th~ pr.ope-'1;}• tc~
ItM-90U, was fil~d in conji.ulct't~n w.ith this Var.~.anc;e and was denied by the
Pl.anning Commissi.un.
5. That tk~rr.~ ar.~ r~o excenli.anal. or. ~xtr,aor.dinary ci.rcurnsl•ances or
condit:ions a~pl.icab,le l-o the pr.oper.ty invo].ved or. l-o the intended u,e o£ ~he
proper~,y L-hat do not a~p:ly gener.al.i.y ~o ~he ~r.oper.ty or. c].ass ~f us~ in the
~ame vicinity an~ zone.
G. Th1t the r-e:c{u~~sL•ed var.~i.ance is not. neceasar.y for. th~ presei-vlt.ion
an~ ~njnyment ot a substani:ial. pr.ope-:t~y ri.ght possessed by ott-~er proper.ty i.n
the same va.cinity and rune, and den ied to l.he p~opert:.y in questton.
7. 7.'hat the r.equested var.i.anc~ wi.;.]. be mattr.:ia.l.l.y detri.met~tal. to the
publ.ic wel~are or injuri.ous to the pr.oper.ty or. impr.ovemcnts i.n such vi.cini.ty
and zone in whi.ch the pr.operty is locaL-ed.
8. `!'hat three persons i.ndi.catec? i:heir. pr.ese~~ce at ~ai.d public
hea~ra.ng in opposition; and that petitions contain•iny appr.ax.~matel.y ~:?
signatures anc3 one ].ettes- werc receivec~ at the Apr~..7. 30, ].984 ~eeti.ng in
opposi.tion to suk~ject petition; and tnal: a petittot- containi.rg s•ix ;6)
signatures w~s received ir~ f.avor. at the June 25, 1.98~~ meeti.ng,
ENV:iRONMENTAL IMPACT F'TNDING: That the Anahe.im Ciky Ptann:ing
Commission has reviewed the pr..oposal. +-~ recl.assify subje~t pr.oper.~y from khe
RS--%200 (Residentid].~ SingJ.e-Fami).y) Zone ~o the RM-24~0 (HesiclentiaJ.,
Mu].tip.le-E'amil.y) or. a J.ess intense zon~ and to c.onver.•t ari exi.sting
si.ng].e-£amily str.ucture and detach~d gaKage into a dup.lex with waiver,s of
mir-imum type of par:ki.ng spaces, minimum si.de yard setback ~nd rnir,i.mum width of
pedestri.an accessway on a r~ctanyuJ.ar.l.y-sha,ped ~ar.ce~l. of ].and consi.stiny of
ap~roxxmatety 7280 sq~xar.e fect havin~ a Er.~ntage of approxi.matF•ty 52 feer on
the north side of North Str.eet, and f~a.r.triEr. cle:~cr.ibed a~ 315 East Nar.th 5tr.c;et;
and does hereby apprnve tt~e Negative Decl.arati.on upon findirig tt~at it has
considerQd the Negative Declaration toyether wi.th any cumments r.eceived during
the publ.ic: r.evi.ew pr.oaess and £ur.thec finding on the ha~is of the inii:ial study
and any comments r,eceived that ther.P i.s no suhstantia). evi.dence that the
project wi~.l. have a siyni~icant effect on the environment.
NOW, THER~FqRE, SE IT RESOLVEil that the Anaheim City Planni.ng
Commi~~i.on does hezeby deny subject Pelition Ec~r. ~Iar. iance on ~he basts of the
aforementioned Eind~nqs.
THF, F'QYEGOING RE,OLUTTON is si.gnec: and ~p~r.ov~d by me this 25th day
oE ~Tune, .1984.
~-~ _ . / ,f~~
Cc'- ~ / r -~--'
CNAI WUMAN~ ANAFiEIM CITY P'LANiJING CC)MMISSTON
~
ATTESZ':~/~ .
/ • ~ ~ ~-
,n _~v ~ /~~'Cili~-~' .`-
S~CRETARY, AldAHLiM CITY }?LANNIhG COMt~I5SI0N
~
-•2- PC84-1.1.8
r~
SZ'A'PG OF CALIF'ORNIA )
COUNTY OI~' OR~INGL ) ss.
CITY OF I~NAEiTIy )
I, Ldith L. fiarr, i.s, 5ecretary of ~t~,c Anaheim C~ ~.y P].anning
C;ummissxon~ do h~~reby cer.ti.£y that the ~orey,o.i.ng r.esal.uGi~n svas passed and
adopted ak a meeting of the Anahcim CiLy Pl.anning Comrnission he.ld nn June 25,
].984, by the to7.].owing vote oF rhe member.s ther.eot•:
.~YES: CUMMISSION~RS: ~SOUAS, BUSHORE, ['RY~ HFftf3S.T.~ KING~ LA CLAZRE
MC BIJRNEY
NOES: CObIMISSI0NEE2S: NONE
AAS~N~': COMMISSIONCRS: NONE
IN WITNLSS WHEREOF, I l~ave her.e~znto set my h~nd thi.s 25r.h day o:f
June, 1984, .
~~ z~ ~~~
SECRE'.CARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING i:OMMISSTON
-3- PC$4-].lfl