PC 84-151. . . . , <~t I~1.~•r~ti
. . . .'...li'~~
RES_ ~LU''1'ION N0. PC84-~151
A FtESOL~UTT()N OF` THE ANAHE.CM CI'PY FLANNING COMMISSIQN
'rHA~.' PF.TTZ'JQN i OR VAl'ZIANCE NU. 34.11 f3~ GR11N`.CED
WEIEREAS, th~ Anaheim City Plannirig Conmission did receive a verified
P~titaon tor Variance Erom FiAWAIIAN V'ILLAGE FECREATI~N CLUB, c/o WILLTAM
PpWELL, 2230 Gray~or. Avenue, Anaheim, Califocnia 9~&O1, own~t~, and WTLLIAM
OHTIZ, 1379 Shannon Lanc, Costa Mesa, Cali~ornia 9262G, ayent for cer.tain real
property situated ,in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State oi
California desr.ribed as;
THE LAND REE'ERREU TO IN TH]:S PRf•.'LIMINAF:Y TT'PLE REP(~RT IS A FEE
UNLESS OTFi~;RWISE AESCTtI13F~ HEREIN, LOCA'~ED IN TI~IE STATE OF
CALIF'OItNIA, C:OUN7.'Y OF O.RANGB AND TS DESCRIBED P.S FOLLOWS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 102 AND 103 OF TRAC`.P NO. 2659, Iv THL CTTY UF ANAHGTM,
CUUI3TY Or URANGE, 5TATE OF CALII'ORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A M~1P
THEREOF R~CORAEA IN BOOK a0, PAGES 5, 6, 7 AND $, M?SCEL'LANEGUS
MAPS, RECOR~S QF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
F]HEREAS, the City Planning Gc~mmission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in Che Caty of Anaheim on July :?3, 1984, at 1:3U p.m., nakice
of said public r~earing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anah~im ~yunicipal Code, Chapter 18.0~,
ko hear and consider eviaence fo- and against said proposed variance and to
investigate anc] mak~ findinys a:~~ -.,comm~nc~atior,;; in connection therewii:h; and
WHEREAS, sa.icl Commissi~~~, after due inspe~tio~z, invest~gation and
si:udy made by itsElf and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does f.iild an~ determine the
fn~low.ing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes cv~itrers of the following t.o
construct two single~-family residences:
(a) SE;CTION 18.26.p63.010 - Minimum ~ront vard setback.
-----_.._~
(20 feet G_inches from Bro~khurst Street
required; 5 feet proposed)
(b) S~C'rION 18.26.065.010 - OrientaLi~n of buil~inqs aciiacent to arteri.al
hiohwavs.
(rear-ori k~ t3rookhurst fitreet required;
fcont-on pr~~osed)
2. '1'hal: the above-mentioned w~ivers are hereby ~ranted on t.he basi.
that primary accey~ to t.he property r~ill bN from a put~lic a11ey to the west
and on the basis that thece are ~pecial circumstances a,pplicable to the
proper~y such as size, shape, topography, lucakion anci surroundings which do
not appl,y to ottier identicaily zoned property in ~he sartie vicinit
stri.ct application of the Zoning Code depr?ves the property, ofY~p ivilpges
enjoyed by o*_her properties in th~ identical zone and cla~siFication i.n the
vici~zity and subject to Interdepartmenta'1 Committee re:commenda~ions.
#07.78r
PC84-151
~~,~
,~,~:~,.
3. 'i'hat there a~e exceptional or extraordi.nary circumstances or
conditions applicab].e i:o the praperty involveci or to the intended use of th~
praperty that do not apply generally to Lhe property or clas: of use in the
sam~ vicinity and zone.
4. That the requesteci vari~nc~ ia ner..e~sary far the pre~crvation
anel enjoyment af a suustantial property r:'tght poss~ssE~d by nther properL•y in
the same vicinity and ron~, and denied to the property in qu~stion.
5. That i:he requested var.ianc~ will nol be m~terially detrim~n~~:l
to L-he public ivelt7re c~c injurious to the property ar impr.uvements in such
v:icinity and zone i.n which the pruper.ty is lucated.
6. That no one indi.cated his pres~ncP at said public hearing in
op~aosition; and that n~ cc~rr~spondence was receivad i.n opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIFtONMEN'.L'AL IMPACT FINDINC;: The Planning Director or his
aut;~orized repre~entative has determined that ~he proposecl prejec~ falls
within th~~ definition of Cat.ego±-ical Exemptions, C.lass 1, as c]efined in the
State EIR Guidelines and is, therefor.e, categarically exempt from the
requirement ta prepare an GIR.
NOW, THEREFCRE, 1iG IT RESOLV~D that ~he Anaheim Cit,y Pl~nning
Commissiun does hereby grant subject Petiti~n Lor Variar~ce, upon the f~llowing
conditions wrich are hereby found to be a nec~~sseiry prerequisit~ to th~
proposed use oF thc: suUjec~ property i~~ ordsr to pre~erv~ ~he safety ar.d
genezal wElfar.~ oF the Citizens of thG Cil-y af Anaheim:
1. That prior tu issuance oF a building permit, appropriat•e park and
recr~uat.ion in-lieu ~ees sha.ll b~ paici to the City of AnahEi~r~ ira an
amount as deter.minc~ by tYie Cit,y C~uncil.
2.. That prior to issuance uf a building permit, t.he appropriate traFfic
signal as:essment fee stiall b~ paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the .^.ity Ccaunci7. for each new dwelling unik.
3. 7.'hat ~he owner of subiect FJroperty shal:l irrevecably of.fer ko
cledicate to the Cil•y of Anaheim a st~ip of land 60 feet in width from
the centerline c~f the street along Brockhurst Street :Eor street
wi.dening purposes.
4. That the vehicular access riyhts, except at ap!~roved access points,
to Brookhurst Street st~all bP dec~i.cated to the City of Anaheiin.
5. 'Phat street lighting faci~.ities along Brookhurst Street Nha11 be
installed as cequired by the Utilit~es Ceneral Manager in accordance
wir.h sper,if.ications on file in trie OtPice of Utilities General
Manager, ancf l•kiat ser.urity in th~ ~~rrn of a bond, certificat~ of
deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in a-i amount and form
satisfactory t~,i:he City of Anahei.m, shall be posted with the Ciky to
guarantee the satisFactory comp].etion of the above-mertioned
i.mprovements. Said security shall be post:ed wi.rh the City of An~heim
pri~r to approval oF im~rovement ~lans. Ttie above-required
improvemer~ts sha11 be installed pr.~or to occupancy.
-2- PC£34-15].
,;;~
6• Tl~at Ehe own~r of- subject properry sha11 pay ~o l:hz City of Anaheim a
Eee Eoz Lr~e plantir~g purposes along i3ro~khurst Street in an am~unt
as determined by the City Council.
7. That drainage nf subject properky shall be c~isposed of in a manner
ratisfackory ta the City Engineer.
8. Thal: subject property sha11 be served by unc~~rground titil.it:ies.
9. That all air conditioning faciliti~s sha11 be properly shielded from
view, and the sound buffered from adjacen't pzoperLies.
10. That prior to iNsuanc~ of building permits, the applicank shal].
present evidence satisfactory to khe Chief Buxldi7g Irispector that
thP residenti~l units wi11 be i.n conforman~e with Noise Insulation
Standards specified in the Ca.lifocnia Administrative Code, ~Pitle 25.
17., That prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant ~hall.
present evidencc satisfactory t:o the Chief Building InspQCtor that
the pr.oposed project is in confr~rmancF with Council Policy Number 542
"Sound Attenuation in Residential Projects".
12. That Lhe owner oF subject property shall submit a let-ter requesting
termination oL- Condii:ional U~~ Permit No. X-13 to ~tte Planning
Depar.tment.
13. That subject property sha11 be developed substantially in awcordance
with plans and specifi~ations on fi].e with the City of Anahe:tm marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5.
14. 2'hat prior lo the time that a b~ailding permiE is iasued, or wikhi.n a
period of one year trom L-he clate of thi~ re~oiu~ion, whichever occurs
first, Condition Nus. 1, 2, 3, ~, 5, 6, 10, 11 and '12,
above-menti~ned, shall k:e complied with. Extei~sions for further time
to comp.lete said conditions may bF gran~ed in accardance with Secti~n
18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
15. That prior to final buildinc~ and z~ning inspections, ~ondi.tion Nos.
7~ a~ ~~,nd 13, above-mentioned, sha~l b~ coniplied w.ith.
F3E IZ' F'U~THER RESULVF:D tha~ tP~e AnahEim Ci~y P].anning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoptiora of tris Resolution i.s expreasly
predicr~ted upon applicant's conip].iance with each ancl all of the condition~
hPrean~bov~ set forth. Should any such conditian, or any part i:hereo.f, bP
declar~~d inva].id or unentorceable by the £inal judc~ment of any ~ourt of
competent j~~risdiction, then this Resolution~ and 1ny appravals her~in
contair.ed, sha.ll be deetn~d null an:l void.
-3•-
,
PC84-151
~
~~ ,~
'rF3L FQR~C,pTNG R~SOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23rd day
oF ~Tuly, 1984.
~ ~~
_. ~r. rY. . ~_ .. , . ;~ . (, . l~'~. C , ~ .
CHAIRWOMAN, PRO T~MPORE
ANAHFIM CI'.PY FLANNINC COMMISSIOI~'
AT'rEST :
.,
/ ^'~ \- I rC.II/1.~1-.7
--__~.~f~~J _~~~/ ~
aECRETARY, ANAHEIM CI7~'Y PLANNING COMMTSS70N
6TATB OF CALZFORNTA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) S~,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
][, Edith L. Harris, aecretary of the Ar.ah~i:n City Planiiing
Commission, do hereby cerkif~ tha~ the faregoing resol~ation was passed and
adopted ak a meeting of the Anah~im Ci.~y Planning Commission hel.c~ on Juiy 23,
].984, by the following vot~ of the members thereof:
AYES: CpMMISSIUN~RS: BOUAS, BUSH~RE, k'RX, KING, LA CLP.IR~, MC BURNFY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I30NE
laBSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HGRBST
IN WTTNE$S WH~I2EOF, I t.ave hpr.eunto set my har.d i:his 23rd day of
Jaly, 198~.
~. ~ ~/~~/
- ~~~~~ ~' /`L/~~~~t_..c
SECRE'rARY, ANAHEIM CIT~ PLANNING CUMMISSION
-4- PG84-151