PC 84-191kE;30LUTIU~J IJO. NCfi4-l.y.l
A R~SUI t;TlO': OE~ '.CH~: ANAHEIM C:I'CY PLANNING COMMTSSION
~'HAT FC7'I`i'TON F'OR VARIAI~CL N0. 34~:3 BL GRAN'I'ED, IN PAR7'
WEiFRLAS, the An~heim City Planni.ng Commissio~ dir~ r~ceive a verified
Petiki~n for Var.ianc~ fcc~m IMPERYAL B,~NK, 9920 South La Cienega Boulevard,
Ir.glewoocl, Cali~ornia 90.`s01, own~r arid Ell FEtA`LTER, 9920 South La Cienega
Roulevard, rngleF~ood, California 9U301, agent ~or certain r~al pruperl•y
situated in the C:ity of Anaheim, Cou~~ty of Orange, StaL-e uf CaiiFornia
descri.l,ed as:
PARI:EL UNE QF A Pt1RCLL MAP, IN ~'HE CT'.I'Y U[' ANAH~IM, REC:ORDGD
AUGUST 24, 1~7~, I~] E3pOK 137, ~AGES 15 AND 16~ ItJCLUSIVL OF
PA~C~L P1AF'S.
WHEREAS, the ~:,i*_y Planning C:ommissiun raid hold a public hearing at
the Ci~ic Center. in ~h~ Cii:y of Anaheim or~ :,~~ptember 17, 1984, at ].:30 p.m.,
noL-ic;e uf said puulic hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordarice wirl: l-he provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Coc3e, Chaptet 18.03,
~~ hea.r ar,d con:~ic~er. evidence for arid agains` sai.~ prupused vari~nce an~ to
i~ivestigate ancl make findingra anc~ recommer.datior~s iii connecti.on therewith; and
WHEI?L•'AS, said Cornmis~sion, after due i.nsF>ecEion, investigatic~n and
~tudy made by i.tself and 117 1tS behal£p and ~lfter due consideration af all
evidence an~ reports ofPered at said 'nearing, ci~es i~r~d ;.r.:3 det~rmi.n~ the
fc~Il~w3.ny tdcts :
1. That kh~ ~~titicner proposes waivers of Lhe fol].owing to ret.air~
the display uf tempurary flags f.or ~~ new residential subd~.~~ision:
(a) SF.C~'ION 18.U5.065.~20 - Maximum number af. f:lag~..
(2 flags permitted; ].6 flacs existing)
(b) SEC'1'ICN 18.05.U85.050 - PPrmil-::ed days of d~splaY.
`~ (8aturday, Sttndays ~ legal holidays
permict.ed; seven day~ a week existing)
2. 7'tial- the above-mentioned waiv~rs are ner.eby granted, in part,
permittin~ 10 flags, on the basis that ther~ are special circumstanc~s
applicable r.o the property such as si•ae, shape, topography, locatior~ and
:urroundir~gs which do not apply to olher ident:ically zc~necJ pro~erty in the
same viciniky; and that strici-. applicakion oE the Zoning Code depriv~s the
property of pri~ri.lege:: enjoy~d by uther propert.ic~s in t.he identical zone and
cla~sification in the v.icinity.
3. That thc:re are exceptional. or extraordin~ry circum~tances or
c;onditions ;,pp].icabl.e tu ~~he property invulvec] or. to tl~e intended use of the
p_~operty that do nut app.Ly genecally to the proper.ty or class uE use =n the
same vicinity and zonc~.
4. That the rec~uesL•ed variance is ,~ecessary for th~ presecvation
and enjoymPnt of a substantial praper.L-y right possessed by other property in
the sa~ne vicinity and •~one, and d~nied to the pruperi:y in question.
#~31dr PC84-191
5. 'I'hat th4, requested ~~~arianc:e ~.~~ill riot k~e materially detrimental
to the oublic welEare c~r injurious to l-.h~ property or. improvements i.n such
~~icini.ty and zone in which the ~:r.operty is le~cated.
G. That no one indicated lheir prE~sence at said public hearing in
oppc~sition; an~l that no corr.c~~pondence was r.eceived in opposition to suhj~ct
petition.
LNVTRONMGN`.t'AL T_MPACl FINDI~G: The Planning J~ii~ector nr his
authorized re~resental-ive has determincd that ~he proposed projec;t falls
wiLhin the de~inition of Catr-gori.cal Fxe:~nt i.on;, Class 11, as defined in the
State EIR Guide).lnes and is, the~eiote; caL-Egoricall,y exem~t from the
requirement to prepare an EIct.
NU~V, THEREFO[~~;, ~~E I'1' RESULVED ;}~at the Anahei.m City Planning
Commi~.sion does hereby grant subject Per_iL•io:~ ~c~r Variance, upon tne f~llowing
condi.ti~ns ~~liich are 'r~er~by found to be a necessary prereg~.~isite to l:t~e
proposed use oi i-t~e subjecl• ~ operty in ordec to preserve ~he safeL-y and
general weJ.fare of the Cikizen~ c..f the City of Anaheimr
1. That subject property st~all bE developeri substantially in accordance
with plaris anc9 specifications on f~ le with the City of. Anaheim matke.~
Exhibit No. 1~
"l. That this variance, permitting a maximum ot- ten (lU) 6-square f.oot
flags, is ytanted ~ur a period of approximatPly ~ix (6) months for a
kerm cotermin~us with the permit issued pursuant to Anaheim MunicipaZ
Ccde Section 18.05.085 g~us any extensians oE time which may be
~pproved by th~~ City Council.
3. Tl~at Condition No. 1, above-menticri~~], shal~. be completed wxL-hin a
Per~ oc) of twenty--sc~ve~n (27 } days Crom the date of Lhia resolution.
BE .TT FUHTHER kESOLVEll that thP Anaheim City ~la~nii~g Comm.ission does
hereby find and de~er.nine that adoption o£ this k2esolution is expressly
predicat:ed upon appl.icant's compliance with each and a11 of the conditions
hereinabave set f.orth. Should aj~y such conditi~n, or any part tFsEreof, be
dEClared invalid or unerforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdictian, then this l~esolution, and any aE~provals herein
contained, shall be aPemea n~.all and void.
TI3E E'OREGO:~NG RESOLUTION i.s sigr.ed arid approved by me this 17kh day
of Septemb~r, 1984. ~' ~
_. .... ' . r' / ~ /.
i ~
i i~ /
~ ~ `%- . "I C.. ;:.: ~-- ~. ':L . '" ~ ~ /_~.~
CHA`I MAN, ANAHFTM CITY PLANNIP7G CUMMI6SION
ATTEST: /~
c...( ' '
~
--- ~~~ r ~~ ~~L.~
S~CRETAFtY, rlNAHk~IM CI`rY PLANNIIVG CUMMTSSIptJ
-2-
~CB~' -19I
!^
:~
S'1'A`i'E OE' CA~lI'JNN11~ )
CUUN'1'Y UF UkA'~IGL ) ss.
CI'.rX Uf~ ANAFiE.IM )
1, Ldith L. Harri:~, ;;r_c.rr~~tary ul t:t,e An~heim City Ylanning
C~m:nissiun, do h~.reby certi~y ~hat l-he Loreyoiny resc•,luti.on was }?assed and
aclopted aL ~ meeting r.>f the An~heim City F~iannin<~ Commission he.id or.
September 17, 19E34, by the to.llowiny vote o£ ;he members thereof:
AYES: C:UMMTSSION~RS: EiUUl1ti, I~RY, I~I;EtBS'i', N:INC;, L.A CLATFtE, Mi: BURNFY
NOES: GQMN,ISSIO[~ERS: B-JSHUF? •L'
F.f35EN'i': r(~MMISSIUNER5: NOtJ[.
IN Wii'NLSS WHL•'REUE', 1 ttave ner.eunt:.o set my !~~anc9 tr:i: 17th day of
Seotembe,, 19~h.
_ _ .~~'~ .~ / ~ _
Sf:CRI'1ARY, ANAHFIM CITY PLANNING COMMI$SIGN
-3-
F~C84 -191
,,: