PC 84-210~~
kESOI~UTTON N0. PC84-210
:1 RGSO.L'JTION Or TH~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI5SION
THAT PE7'TTION FOR VAKlANCE N0. 3428 I3~ GRANTED, IN PART
WHEP,EAS, the Anaheim Ci.ty planning CUmmission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from RAYMONll G. 5PEHAF<, ET. AL., 6937 Avenida de
uantiago, Anaheim, Califorr~.i.a, 92807, owner, and GUS CHRTSTOPOfJLOS AI3D JUAITH
MARI1~ CHR:iSTQPOULOS, 5750 East La P~~1ma Avenue, Anaheim, California 97.$07,
agents for certai.n real property situated in the City ~E Anaheim, Caunty ~f
~ranye~ State of Ca.lifor.nia desrribed as:
P.~RCEI~ 1, TN THE CITY UF ADIAHE:[M, CQUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE; OF
CALIFORNIA~ A5 SHOWN CN A E~ARCEL MAP P,E~ORDGD TN BOOK 75, PAGE
73 OE PARCEI, MA~'S, IN THE QFFICE OF THE COUNTY R~CORDER OF
SAID COUN7'Y.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hcld a~u~alic heari.ng aL
the Civic Center in the City oF knaheim on October 1, 198~, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said puhlic hearing having been duly given as required by Zaw and in
accordance wiL•h th~ ~rovisians of ttie Anah~im Municipal Cade, Chapt~r ~8.03,
to hear arid consider evidence Eor. and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make finding~ and recommandati,~ns in ~onnection therewith;
said public hearing having been continued to the i~~~eting of October 15, 1984;
and
WHEItk;AS, said Commissi.on, after due inspection, investiqation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of a11
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
Following facts:
1. 'rhat the petitioner proposes waivers of the €~llowing ka er~ct
four (4j wall ~~gns:
(a) SECTIONS 18.05.U91.02Q - Perrnitted number of. wall signs.
AND 18.84.062.040 (1 wall sign permitted; 5 wa].1 siQns
~roposed?
~
~:,~.
(b) SECTI~NS 18.05.091..052 - Prohibited siyn liqhtina.
AND 18.l~A.062.040 (sign lighting not permitted between
midnight and 6:30 a.m.; dusk t~ dawn
liqhtin~ prop~sed)
~:.
2. That the above-menti.oned wai.ver (a) is herehx granted, in part,
tU permit two (2) wa11 signs consisting of ~ne (1) wrap-around type sign on
the nor~hwest corner o~' the building and allowing the existing wall sign to
remain on the south si.de of the building; and, in addition, that the word
"restau:ant" shall be addeci to the existinq wa11 sign on the south side ~f. the
building; and furrhermr,,re that said waivers (a) and (b) are hereby granted on
the basis tt,at there are special circumstances applirable to the property ~ucti
as s.ize, shape, topogcaphy, location and surcoundings which da not apply to
other identically zr~ned proper.ty in the same vicinity; and that strict
application of the Zoning Code cleprive~ ~he property of privileqes en;~oyed -~y
athNr properties in the identical zonp an~ classifica~ion in the vicini~y and
subjecL to Interdepa:tmental Committee recommendations.
#0342r PCB~-210
.,.
~
~ ~
3, That the two existi.ng "dir.ectional" wa].l signs :labelled
"Restaurant" and "Cocktails" shall be removed.
4. Th~t ther.~ are except.ional or extraordi~lary circumstances or
candi~ions applicabl~ to the pr.operty involved or to thP int.ended use of the
propert,y that cio not apply yenecal.l.y to the pr.~perty or ~~lass of use in the
same vicin.iky and zone.
5. That th~ reyuesi~ed vari~nce, as grar~ted, is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a sub~tantial pro~er.ty r.igt7t pos~cUsed by other.
property in the same vicinity and 2one, and den.ied to the pzoperty in question.
6. 'Phat the requc~sted variance, as grante~, will not be materially
detrimental to the puhlic welfare ur injurious to i:he property or improvements
in such vicinity and zone in which tr-e pr.operty is lacated.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
oppositi~n; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subjtct
p~tition.
E;NVIRO~IMENTAL IMI~ACT E'INDING: Th~ Flanning Dfr~ctor or hi~
authorized representative has determined that the praposPd project f.a12:
within the de~in~tion o£ Categorical F~emption~, C.lass 11, as defxned in the
State EIR ~•uidelines and is, therefore, categoi~ically exempt from the
requirement to prepare an EIR.
N~W, THLREFORE, BE I'r' RESOLVF'D that the A~~aheim City Planning
Commissian does hereby granr su~ject Petition for Variance, upon *_he fol].owing
conditions which are her~by found to be a neceysary grerequisite to i:he
proposed use of the subject property in or.der to preserv~ the s~fety and
~eneral welf•ar~ of the Citizens of the Ci.ty of Anaheim:
].. That subject prcperty shall be developed subsi:antially :in accordai~ce
with p].ans and specifications on file with the City of l~nat~eim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2; ~rnvided, however, that nnly two (2) wa11 signs
shall be permitteci as follows:
(a? One pro~ose~i wrap-arouncl siyn on the nori:hwest cornez o£ the
building; and
(b) One existing ~rall sign on the sauth sidP of the bui.lding
labellsc9 "Kenas" with l-.he additional wocd "Restaurant".
2e That prioc to final bui].ding and zoning inspec~ions~ Condition Nn. 1,
~bove-mention~d, shall be compli.eG with.
F3E IT FURTHER ~ES~LVED that the Anaheim City Planning ~ommission does
hereby find and determine that adoption af l:his Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant'~ compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Shois'd any su~~h condition, or any part thereof, be
declaced invalid or unenF;rc:eable by ti,~~ final judgme~~i of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then Chi.s Resolut_ ~, and any approvals herein
cnntained, shall be deemeci nul]. and void.
-2-
L ~
i
~'+~~'i'~i.i~~ ~ •M 1x.5~.; .+lK 7..4 .
PC84-210
~r1
vill~~
~ilr~i
~ ~~ ~
x'HE FUREGOING IZESQLUTIOiV is :~igned and appruved y_me~ is ].5th day
of October, ].984. /
, . `~-'~~ r ..
.__ ' .
...`` ~~ • ~ n / ~
\' •' / e ~' C ~~ ~~! C1
~~'s~-T-'~~AHErM;- CT' PLANNING COMMISSlON
ATTEST;
. ~ ~~.~._.
SECRETA Y, ANAIiEIM CITY PLANNING CUMMISSI02~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY UF ORANGE ) ss.
CTTY UF ANAHEIM j
jr Edikh L. fiarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Flanning
Co~mission, do hereby certify thah the foregoing reNoiution was passed and
adopte~ at a meeting oF the Anaheim City Planning Cemmission held on October
15, 1984,. by the followiny vote of the members thereo£:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE, FkY, HERBST, KINC, LA CLAIRE,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABS~NT: COMMTSSIONERS: BOUAS, MC BURNEY
IN WITNES~ WE3EREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of
October, 1984.
~L~C..~_ ~ 1~•+~ --A.
SECl2ETARY, ANAFiEIM CITY PLANr1ING COMMISSION
~~~._
~; ;
,.
v "'
~' '
.ti.
~,~ ~
"3' PC3~l-210
~