PC 84-223fnti ' ~ .. ~ ~ . . ~ . . .
RESOLUZ'ION N0. PC84-223
A RESOL•U`PION OF '1'H~ :1NAHEIM CITY PL,ANNTNG COMMISSIQN
T~iAT PETITION FOR VARIAIVCE NO. 3435 BE GRAIVTED
WHFItEAS, the Anaheim Ci~,Y Plannix-g Commission did receive a vetified
Petition for Variance ~rom CENTUR~' AMERICAN CORPORATION, AT'rN: rZOGER C. HOBBS
AND AAN J. MOOFtE, 14?.A rasi: Chapman Avenue, Urange, California y2666, owners
oE certai.n real prc~p~rty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California described as:
PARCFLS 1 AND 2 AS SAID PARCELS ARE SHOWN ON TH~ PARCEL MAP
FTLED AECENIBER 23, 1983 IN BOOK 185, FAGL 22 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CUUNZ'Y RECnRDEK pF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Plannin~~ Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in ~he City of Anaheim on October 29, 1984, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of ~aid public h•~aring having bEPn du.ly given as r.equired by 1aw and in
accordance with the ptovisions of ~he Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidenc~ for and against said proposed variance and to
inveskigate and makp fi.ndings and recommen~ations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commis:yio;i, after due inspe:,tion, investiqation and
study made by ikse.lf and in its behalf, and after due consideration ~f all
evidenr.e an~ rer~orts oftered al• said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That thz petitioner proposes a wai.ver of the following to Xetain
the display of ten (10) temporary flags for a new resic3~ntial subdivfsion:
SECZ'ION 1F3.05.Oa5.050 - Permitted davs of dis lav
(Saturdavs, Sund~~s and Lega2 holi~avs
permttted; Seven_davs a week proposed)
2. That thP above••mentioned waivezs are hereby granted c~n the basis
that there are special circtamstances applicable to the properts~ such as gize,
shape, topography, ].ocation and aurroundings which do not apply to other
identically zoned propexty in the same vicinity; and that ~trict application
of the Zoaing Ccde deprives the proppcty of privile es en'o ~~ b ~
prn~ertie. in t}~e identical zorie and classification in the vicini y. y othE.r
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstanccb or
c~nditions a.pplicable to the property invc~lves~ or to the intended -~s~ ~~ ~he
prop~rty khaC do not apply generally to the proper~y or class of use in the
samP vicinily and ~one.
4. Th~t the rer~uested variance is necessary
ancl enjoyment ot a substantial property right possessed
the samu vi~inity and zane, and ~enied to th~ prope~ty in
5. Tha~ the requesked variance will not be rt
to t~ie public welfare or i~zjurfou~ to the propeity or
vicinity and zone in whirh the property is loca;.ed.
~0355r
for r_he pres~rv~tion
b}~ other property in
question.
~atekially detr,imental
improvements in such
PC84-223
~ ~,. i ~
6. That no one ir~icated th~ir presence at said public hearing in
oppositxon; and l-hat no corcespondence was recaiv~d in oppo~itiori to subject
petiti~n.
ENVIRONMENTAL TMPACT FTNDI:NG: The P~anning Directar or his
authorized re~resentative has determined that th~ proposed project falls
wi.thin the definition of Ce :egorical F:xem}~tions, C1ass 11, as defined in the
St:ate EIR Guir]elxnes and is, there~ore, categorically exempc .~rom the
requirement ~o prepare an E:[H.
NOW, THEREE'O12E, BE IT RESOLVEU tY,~t th~ Anaheim City Planning
Commi~sion does hereby gr~nt sub ject 1Petition for Var. iance, upon ti~e follow~ing
conditiu~ns which are hereby f.~und to be a necessary prerequisite to th~
proposed u~e of the subject property in order to preserve the saf.ety and
general welfare of the Citizens oE tk~e Ci.ty of Anaheim:
1. That subjact pro~ecty shall be devel~ped substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
E~;hibit No. 1; provided, however, that only ten (10) temporary f].ags
may be displayed on-site.
2. That this variance, permikting a maximum of tQn (10) temporary flags,
is granted for a term cot~rmxnous with the permit issued pursuant to
Anaheim Municipal Code Secti.nn 18.Q5.085 plus any extensions of time
which may be approved by the City ~ouncil.
3. Thak Condition No. .1, above-mentioned, shall be completed within a
peri~d of thirty (30) days from the date of this res~lution~
BE IT FURTFiER RESOLVED ~kiat the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expre~sly
predicater~ upon applicant's compliance with each and ~11 of the conditi~nc~
hereinabove set Eorth. Should any such condition, ar any park thereof, be
dpcJarEd invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
rompetent jurisdiction, zhen this Re~olution, and any appz~ovals herein
contuined, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING P.ESOLUTION is si~~ned and approved by me this 29th day
o.f October 1984.
C~'~2~ / r'~X LZ ~J~cu.+..-~' ~
CHAIRWOMAN, PRO iEMPORE ~`
.~NA~IEIM CITY .PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST;
~. • /~-'
'~' ~ L..4.v
S~CRETA.kX, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSION
-2° PC84-2i3
~A F~ i 1
ry-.f~ '~ . . . ..
f^ 1
/ ~~.
STAmE OF CALIF012NIA )
COUNTY OF ORANC~E ) ss.
C:ITX Ob' ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim city Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foXegoirig resolution was passed and
ar~opted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Oct~ber
29, 1984, by the following vote of• the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; EipUAS, FRY, KING, LA CLAIR~, MC BURNEY
NOE,S; COMMISSIONERS: BUaHORE
AI~SEt7T; COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
''N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sPt my hanc] this 29nc ~lay of
October 2~, 1984.
` ~~ .~..~ ~~~~ .~
SECR~TARY, ANAHEIM CITY PL^ AT NNIIVG COr1MISSION
_3_
,..~,~~.~,,,..~< ._.. _. , .
PC84-2~3