PC 84-245~~i
R~SOL[77.'ION _ NO . 1~C84 -2 4 5
A RESOLUTION '1F `l'HE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PFTITION FOi2 REGLASSIFICA`rION N0. 84--85-14 BF, GkAN'~'FD
WHFRFAS, the Anahei,m
petition for Reclasraifzcatipn C.ity Planning Commi.ssxon
fro did r.eceive a verifted
Auen~ Vista BoulPVard, I.aguna m FI~MER WEBBER and VI
Hil].s, Calzforni VIAN W,EggER, 3020-0 Via
PABST, JR., 51.50 ~ast Pac;.if.ic
90804 a 92653,
Coast H.ighway, Suite 470 ownPrs, ~~nd
L GEORGE ~?.
, age~c for certai.n real
oF Orange, State of Ca.Iiforn
ia ,
property saituated in the
l ong Beach, Ca.li~orni.a
CtLy of An~hei.m, County
. o c
escribed as fo11ows;
THE EASTEKLY 65 F~~E'L' OF THE WESTERLY 125 FEET nF LOT 5,
WEIGHT, FREEMAN & MC CLOUGHAN SUBDIVISIpN, AS PER MAP RECORDED
IN BOOK 1, DAGE 2 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE UF THE
COUNTY RECORDER, ORANGE COUNTY. E?~CEPT THEREFROM `i'HE
SOUTHERLY' 506 FEET~ ALSO EXCEFT THE NOR.TH 5.25 FEET AS
CONVEYE,O TO THE CITY OE ANAHEIM I'OR ROAll PURPOSE~ BY DEED
RECORDED MARC.H 4, 1912 IN BpUK ~10, Pd~,GE 6 ~k' llEE.OS,
WHEREAS, ~he City Plann.ing Commxssion did hold a oublic hear.ing at
the Cxva,c CentEr .in the Cxty oE Anahei.m on Nove
natice of said public heara.ng havi.ng been dul mber 26, 19s34 at 1:30 p.m.,
accordance with the Y given as requir~d by 1aw and in
pravis.ions of the Anahei.m Munzcipa.l Code. Chapter 18.0's,
to hear and consider evxdence f or. and against sai.d proposed reclass.iElcation
and to inveski.ga~e and mal:e find.ings and rec~mmend«t:ton~ ir, connectian
therer~~ th; and
WHEREAS, sai.d r~~rnmission, after due ins~ieci:ion, invest.igation ~nd
study made by itsel~ and a,n :its behalf, and after due cnns.ideration of all
eva.den~e and reports offe:ed at said heari~ng, does fxnc; and det~rmi.ne the
follow.ing facts;
~. That the pet.~ition~~r p
property from the RS-72~0 ~'ro oses r.eclassi.ficat.ion of subject
(Resident.ial, Mult:iple-Fam.ily) ~r~~~1ztSS~antensenzoneFamily) to the RM-120~
Z. Thal the Anaheim General Pl~n designates sub~ect propertx for
~neda.um density resxdent.ial lanc! uses.
3o T;,at the proposed reclass.i.ficati.on oi subject property i.s
necessa:y a.nd/or desirable for the orderly and proper d~velapment oE the
commttnity.
4. Th~t the ~roposed reclassxficat.ion oL• subj~ct property does
propexly relate to the zones and ;;:ieir perm.itted uses ~ocally estat+l;shed .in
close prox:irtii.ty to subj~ct property and za the zones and thei.r
generally eytabli.shed throughout the aommur.i.ty. P~rmi.tted uses
5• That tt~e propos~d reclassificati.on of suu'ect
the dedi.cation of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulaki.onrElement
of tbe General Plan, due to the antic~pated inctease in traffic whi.ch wi.ll be
ger,erated by the intensifi.catzon of land usP..
#0379r
~.,]~
1,,+.
~~:f
PC84-245
,•--,
6. That no one i.ndi.cated their pres~nce at said p~ibli.c 5eari.ng i.n
opposition; and that no correspondence was received i.n opposi.ti,on to subject.
pet i,ti.on .
BNVIRONMEN~!'AL IMPAi:T FINDING; That the Anah~im Ci,ty Planni,ng
Commission Pias revxewed the prop~sal to recla~s9.fy stibject property fram the
RS-'72UQ (Resiclential, Single-Family) to tl~e RM-.1200 (Residential,
Multx~le-Famz~y) or a less intense zane to consL•ruct a 7-uni.t apaXhment
complex with waivers of maximum structural hei.ght ar~d perm:itted type of tenant:
parka.nq sp~ces an a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consi.sti.ng of
approx~.mately 0.21 acre, t~aving a frantage of a~prox.i.tnately 65 f.eet on the
~outh si.de of South Street, and furi:her described as 406 E~s~ South Street;
and does hereby approve the Negative Declara~ion uaon f.indi.ng that i.t has
consxdered th~ Negati.ve Declarati.on tageL-her wi.th any cor~men~s recei.v~~d duri.ng
the public revi.ew process and further f.inai.ng on the busis o£ the ini~L•zal
study and any commentti recei.ved that thPre a.s no substantial ev.idence that the
project will have a signa.Ei~.ant effec;t on ttie envi.ronment.
NOW, THFREFORE, B~ T~1~ RESOLVE?~ that the Anahei.rn Ci.ty ~],anning
Commzssi.on does hereby grant subject Petit:ion f~r Rec].assificati.on and, by so
doiny, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anahei.m Muni.czpal Cor~e be amended to
Qxclude the above-describe~ property from the KS-7200 (Resi.denttal,
Sxngle-Fami.ly) Zane and to incorporats said d~scribed property ~.nto the
RM~1200 (Residential, Mult.iple~-Family) Zone u~on the followang conditi~ns
wh.ich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisxte to khe proposed use of
sub~ect property i.n ord~r to prescrve the saf~ty and general welfare of the
C.iti.zens of the City of Anahe.im:
1~ That the owner o~ subject pra~erty shall irxevocably offer to
ded~ca~e to the Ca,ty of Anahe~.m a s*rip of land 32 feet :in wi.dth from
thc centerline of the street along Soul•h Street for street wxdening
purposes.
2, That prior ta the inkroduct:~on oE an or~inance rezon.inc~ suk~ject
prope~:ty, Conditzon No. 1, above-mentioned, st~a11 be completed. The
provi,sa.ons or r.ights granted by th.is resulut.ion shall become nu11 and
vo:id by action of the Planni.ng Commiss.ion unless sa~.d conditions are
complied wil•h within one year L•rom the date oF thxs resolution, or
such f.urther time as the Planning Commi.ssi.on may grant.
Br IT FCRTHER RESOLVED i:hat the AnahPim Czty Plannxng Commi.ss:ion does
hereby find and determi.ne that ~dopti.on of this Resolution is expressly
~redi.cated upon appli.cant's compli.ancp with each and a11 ~f khe conclitions
hereinabcve set torth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
deciared invalici ox unenforceable by Lhe final judgment o£ any court o£
compe~ent juri.sdxcti,on, then l-his Resoluti.on, and an~ approvals herein
containeci, shall be de~med null and void,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTTUN is si.yned and approved by me this 26~h day o~
November, 1984. % i" ~~; ,J
~ l
~._._.._"I ,
\'
,
, '' /
_
•°
~ /i'/L•~
,,~~) / '!~' 1~
CH~i~RN(AN, ANAIiEI'M C TY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~
~.E~~ ,~ ~ .
SECRETAR~I, ANAHEIM CITY PLAN~'ING COMMISSIAN
-2~' PC84-245
; ~~-1,
S'1'AmE OF CALIF'OItNIA )
COUNTY 0~' OftANGE ) ss.
CITY OE' ANAFIEIM )
I, Ed.it.h L. Harris, Secretar.y of the Ana'~eim Ci~y planni.na Commxssion, do
t~ereby ce:tif.y that th~ Eore~o.ing xesolut.ion was passed and adopted at a
meeti.ng of tne An?!~Pi.m Ci.ty Planni.ng Ca~miss~ion held on November 2G, 1984, hy
the followi.ng vote nf the members thereot:
AY~;S: COMMISSTOflEFtg; BOUAS, 6USHOKi, f~RY, tiE.Ra,c~r: KING, LA CLAIRE,
MC BURrIEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESa WEIERECF, r have hereunto set my hand th.is 26th day of November,
1984.
~
. ~
SECRETIIRX, p~~IM ~~~L1.~~•?i
CITY PLANNING COMMISSIUN
,,, , ~.,..~., _ . . . . .. ,