PC 84-31krsaL;~~rzo~ Na. i~ce~-~a.
A I2L•'~ULU~i'ION UE' THE ANAf~1LIM CT't'Y. PI~ANNINC COMMTSSIQN
DEN"tNG ~F;NLRAL PLAN AM~NUMEN'1' NU. 1`~0-LAA~U USE F LEMEIJ`.C
WHL~tGAS, t}7e City C~uncil of' thc Ci.ty of: Anaheim cii.d adupC ~he
Ana:~eim General Flan by Resolut-ian No. 69R-644, showing t;~e gen,~ra1
~escra.ption and extent of p~ssible fuCure develapment wlthin t~he City; and
WHEFEAS, pur.suant to a request from the ~roperly owner for a General
Plan Am~ndment at~dy, City staff prepared a Gener.a.l Plan AmPndment for an area
consisting oL- approxin~ately 9.6 acrea located on the sauth side of Wilhen Way,
approximately 615 Ee~t ~ast of thp centecline of Harbar Boulevard; and
WHLREAS, the 1~].anning De~~~rtment deemed it appropriate, pursuant ~o
the provisicns of the c;alifornia Environmen~al Quality Act, .-~Fter ceview of
th~ proposal and Initial Study and linc3ing no :~ignific~~t environmenta.l
impact, t:hat a Negative D~claration be appr~~ved~ and
WHL•'11LA5, the Anah~im City P.lanning Commission did hold a public
-~eariny at the Anaheim Civic Center., Council Chamber, 200 Suuth Anaheim
Boulevard, on l~ebrtiary 22, 1984 ak 1:3U p.rn., n~tice of said public hearing
having been d-aly given as r~quired by law and in ac~cordance with trie
provisions ot trie Anat~cim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said amer-dment to the General Plan and to invesligate and make
findings and recommen~9ations in connecLion t.hE~rewith; and
iaHGREAS, said Cummi.ssion, after c~ue consideration, inspection,
investigat:~n anrl study m~~de by itself, and after due cAnsideratinn of all
evicience and reports offered at said hearing, DOES HERGf3Y F~TN~);
1. That the current Low-MHdium pensity Residential designat.'•.on (up
to 18 dwelling units ~er acre) i~ :~till appro~riate for the
atudy area.
'l. 'Phat khe propo ~ed Mediurn Density Re:;idential de~ignakior. would
l,e incompatible with thE exisCing Low-Density Resid~ntial usps
to tt~e ~orth and east o!: the study acea.
ENVIRONMENTAL I;~1~ACT FTNUING: That the Anaheim City P.lanning
C~mmissi~n has reviewed thP F~oposal to change the current Law-Medium Uensity
Residenlial de~ignation to Medium Density Residential dn a
rectangular:y-shapec3 parcel of 7.and consi~tiing of approximatFl; 9.6 ~cre~
located on the south ~ide oi Wilken Way, approximately 615 feet e~;t o£ the
centerline oi Harbor. Boulevard; and does hereby disa~prove the Negative
Beclarar.ion from the requirement to pre~are an environmental impact repart on
the ba3i~ that there would be aiyniffcant individual or aumu~ari~e adverse
environmental impacts involved in r_his proposal; and tha~ an environmer.ta~
impact re~ort wou.ld be czquiced ~rior to approval of this proje~t.
NC3W,
findings, the
Am~ndment No.
2'H~RI~EOR~., Bk: IT RESqLV~U, that pursuant to the foreyaing
Anatieim City Pl.anning Comrnission does hereby deny General Plan
19 .
#01~8: pC84-31
,^"'^+~
~ i'
7'EIE ~0~2F:GOING ~2ESOLU7'ION is signed ~ind ripprovr-.d by me this Febru~ry
22, 1984.
. ~'/ ~I ~ ~ ~ %,~`~ ~ ~~~ ~i ,
~ ~~1 -
CE•IAIRWUMAN, ~ H~,IM CII'Y pLANNING COMMIS: TON
/
ATTEST:
L J ' ~,,~
,~'? • _~~~~ Y'I...LE°J
SECFtETARY, ANAHEIM C:L'TY PLANNTt1G COMMISSTON
S~'AT~ OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OI' ORr~idGl: ) ss .
CITY vF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith I~. Harris, ,ecretary ~f the Anaheim rity planning
Commis~ion, do hereby ccrtify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted ak a meeting ot- the Anaheim Cii:y Planning Co:nmission h~ld an February
2?., 1~a4, by the following vot.e of: the membQr~ th~reof::
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BnUAS, BUSHURE, kRY, K.iNG, MC f3UR~]LY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
A$SENT: COMMYSSIONFF~'a: HERBST
ABS7'AIN: COMMISS.IONFRS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS P~HERLOF, I IiavP hereunto s~t my hand this 22nd day of
E'ebruary, :1984.
-~~.~ ,~° , .
~~ ~~~~
SGCRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAtJhING COMMIS:iION
..Z_
PC84-31