PC 84-37?~°i ~1~ ,', . ~.
'+',4,• RESO'LU'1'IUN NO. PC:t39-37
'a;~~ ,
~~`i`~~•~ A RESOI,U~!'ION OF TEIE ANAHEIM CTTY P.TANN7NG COMMI;iSION
F.~~: ~: ~
~°''` ' `.CH"T PE;'1'I~i'ION FOR REC;LASS:iEICATION N0. 83-84-20 BE GR}1N',CED
WElEkEAS, the Ar,aheim C~ity Planning Cammi.ssion did receive a veri.fied
petition Eor Rec'lassification fram EIL,EEsN A. DIZUIFF, 31G North ~.iasta,
Ana.heim, California 92801, owner of c~rtai~i r.eal ~ropert1 situated in the Cit;~
ot Anaheim, Cattnty of Urange, S~at~ of Califor~lia, describe6 ~s f~l.lows.
PARCEL 1, PARCEL i~i.Ai~ 79-234
''•,; 4dHE12EAS, the City .~lannin~,~ Cemmission did hold a publa.c hearing ~t
~:;,r the Civic Center in hhe City of Anaheim on Febr.uary 22, 1984 at ~:30 p.m.,
!'• natice or said pul~li.c heari,n~ havin~ been duly given as req~!ixed by law and in
,°',;~ accord«nc~ with the prov~sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
~;~ to hear and considpr evidence for ancl again~t said proposed reclassification
and L•o i-:ve~tigate an~ make findings ai~d recommendations in connPCtio~n
~ Lhere~~ith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after c~ue inspection, investigation and
study mai~e by it self and in its b~half, a,id axter clu~ consideration of a11
evidence anc~ re~orts offarec~ at said hear.ing, does fiiid and determine the
£~llowing .facl•s:
1. 'rhat the petitioner p~~oposes reclassification ot subj`ct
propercy from the RS-7200 (22eside:4ia1, Singl~-Family} Zone to the RM-2~~00
(Residential, Mu].tiple-Family) 'Lone .
2. ~'hat the Anah~im General Plan designaL-es subject proper~y for
mec3ium-density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclrxssifi~ation of suuject pzoperty is
necessary and/or desir~ble for the orderly and proper develap~nent oi thp
c~mmunity.
4. That c:tie proposed reclassification of subj~ct. pr.operry does
properly relate to tk~e zories and their permitte~ uses local.ly e~tabli~hed in
close proximi.ty to subjeat property and to the zonus and their permitt~ed usea
generall,y establi~hed throughou~ th~ comniunity.
5. That the ~:roposed xeclassificatiun of subject property requires
the improverrienL- of abutting stre2ts in accordanc:e with the Circulation E~emec,i:
of t-h? General Plan, due to th~ anticipat~d iric:rease in traffic wt~ich will be
gene.rated by the intensiftcation of land use.
6. That one p~rson i.ndicated their pres~nce at said public hearing
i.n opposit.xon; and ~that no corr.espondence was received in oppositian :;o
s~zbjer.t peti.ti.on.
#0161r PC84-37
~ ~,'-
~ f"`~
LNVIRONMENTAL :CMPACT FINllING,: That the Ailaheim City Planning
Commission has revipwed the pr.opas~l to r~c.las:~ify subject praperty £rom t.he
kS-%J.OU (Resider~tial, Single~Family) Zane to the RM-2400 (R~si.clential,
Multiple-Family) Gor~e ta const.ruct. a dup1~M with s~~~i.ver of minimum sideyard
seL•back ~n a recL-ang~~larly-shape~3 ~arce?_ ~£ 7.and c:onsisting of approximately
0.16 acre, tiavi.ng a fros~tage of approximately 50 feet on the east side o~
Harding Drive, and further dc~~cribed as 124 Soutl~ Harding Drive; and d~es
her~by approve the N~yativc: lleclaratian upo-1 fir~ding t~ha~ it has considered
Lhe Negat~ve Declaration loyether w~.~h any comments received ~uring the public
review procesa and further finding on the basis o~: the initial shudy anc~ any
comments received l:hat th~r~ is no subskanti.aJ. evidence that the pc•~j~c~ wi11
have a significant eFfect on the envirnnment.
NUW, THERF.FOR~, EE IT RESOL'V~D that the Anaheim ~ity Planning
Commission does hEreby grant subject Petition ;Eor Reclassification and, by s~
doing, that Title 18-2oning o.E th~ Anaheim M~anicigal c'ude be amer,ded i:o
exclude tl~e aL•~ove-described ,property from ;tS-'7200 (Resicl:;ntial, Single-Family)
Zone anc] to incorparate said described ~roperty into the RM-2400 (Residential,
t4ultiple-Family) Zorie upan the following c~tidition: which are hereby found to
be a necessary prPrequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order
to preserve the safety and ycner.al we:lfarE ~f the Citi.zens oi the Cit~~ of
Anaheim:
1. '.Ptiat completion of_ these r.eclassifi.cation proceedin~;s is c.ontingent
upon the g.ranting of Variance Na. 3375.
2. That th~ owner of subject property ~hall pay i:o the Ca.ty of ~~naheim
a f.ee f~r t.ree planting purposes alor~g Har~.ing Drive in an amount as
deterr~ined by the City Council.
30 '.1'hat the owner of subject pr~perty shall pay to the City oi Anaheim
a fee for~ street lighting along fiarding Drive in an amount as
d~termined by the City Council.
4. That subject property shall be devFloped substantially in accordance
with plan~ and specificatio~ls on file with the i:ity o£ Anaheim
mar.ked Exhibit t~os. 1 rhrough 3; provi~e d, however, that che carport
roofs and all c~merxt pads and ~ariveways shaJ.l b~ designe d ~o as to
pr.eclude any run-off water frum clrai.ning onto any adja^ent propexty.
5. 'rhat prior to the i.ntroduction of an ordinance rezoning sub;jact
proper~.y, Condition Nos~ 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall bP
comp~eted. 'Phe provisions or righty granted by this resoluti.~n
shall Uecome null and void by actio;~ of the Planning Commission
unless said conditions are compli.ed with wi.thin one year Prom the
d~te oF tYiis resolutio~i, or such Eur.ther tim~ as +:he Pianning
Commission may grant.
6. That prior ~c, fina.l bui:lding and ~.oning inspections, Candition
No. 4, above-mer~tionPd, shall be romplied with.
-2- PC84-3i
~~ ~~ ~ ~`~.
gE I2' F'URTHEI2 RESOLVED that the ~naheim Ci~y Planning Commi~slon
does hereby fi.nd and determi.nF that adop~io~i oF this Resolutian is e~;pressly
predicated upon app.licant's compliance with ~ach ~nci all of the conclitioris
hereinabave set forth. Sho~~lcl any suc:h cundi~ion, or any pazfi ~hereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the fi.nal iucigmen~ o~ uny c:ourt af
competenL- jurisdicti~n, then this Re:oluti.on, and any approva7.s herein
contained, shall be deer~ed null and void.
THE FOR~GOIDJG ktESOLUT:CON is signec7 ani~ approved by me this 2.2nd day
oL- b'ebruary, 1984.
~~,f~~• i
' ////~,~L'/ .~ . .~~ ~'~-r£._/
CHAIRWONIAN; A~fHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
~
aTTEST;
"""`"'f`-~, ^ • ~ T~^~~'1.t'`ti-
SECRE'PARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSTON
ST~1TE OF CALI~'ORNIA, )
CUUNTX OF ORAIJGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAH~IM )
I, Edi'th L. Harris, secretary ~f th~ Ar~aheim CiL•y Plann~ng
Commission, do hereby certify that. tr~e for~going resolution was pzssed and
aciopted at a me~tinq of the Anaheim City Planning Commission he'ld on February
22, 1984, by the following voi:~ o~ the members thereof:
AYES: COF1MIaS70NERS: BUUAS~ BUSHORE~ ICING~ LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NU~a: COMMISSI~NERS: NONE
ABSEN~': C!aN,MISSIONE;RS: FRY, HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEF.~EOF, I Have r-ereunto s~t tny hand ~his 22nd day oI
Eebruary, 1984. ~//7 /~
~Y i'~~~~'4'~J / ` . '
S~Gk~7'ARY, AtIAHEIM CIT: ~LANIVING COMMI.~',SION
-3-. PC$4-37