PC 84-38Fth,;;OLUTIUN NU. pr_~c}_3~
A RGSC)LU'PTON OE 'i'!iL ANAFiE.TM c:I'!'Y i~I~ANNTNG CnMM1,SSTON
THA`1' !~~'!'i'!'TOtd }?Ck VAItIANCF. N0. 3375 13E Glt.f~,N'.1'EU
~~ WHEREAS, tt~ie Anahei.m City P.l:,nniny Cc~mmissioi; did rrceive a~~eritie~i
~et~.tion £or V~r.i~~nce Erom F;IIEN,~J A. URUIE~E; 316 North Siesta, Anahezm,
;~ Cal!Lornia 92801, owner c~f~ certai~ real pruperty
Ane~heim, County of Oranc~e, State of Ca1if ,rni~ dE.,cribed~l~sed in the City of
~ ~,
~'ARCEL 1, i%AItCEL MAP 79-23~
WHEftEAS, the City k~:lann.inc,~ Comrnission ciid hold a public r,earing at
the Ci.vic Center in the City of. Anah~im on Febcuary 22, ].9g4, at 1:3G p.y~.,
noCice pf said p~blic hearing having becn duly given as regtiir.ed by law and in
accordance erith the provi.;ions of l•tie Anahe~,m Municip~i Code, Chapter 16.03,
;:o I~ear and cons.idcr evicence Eor and ay~irtst said
inve~tigaL•e and mak~ f.indings and recommendatioris in connectionVtherewith;r~and~
41iiEREAS, said Comrs.ission, after ~iue inspect.ion, investiyati~n and
stud,y made by itself ind in it.s behalt, and ,clec due consider.ation ~f all
evidence and reporl:s r,.;f.ered ak said hearirg, do~s f.nd ana determine the
fullowing fact,:
1• Thak the ,petitioner propor.~s a waiver of tt~e following ro
cortstruct a duplex:
SECTTON 18.3"l.t163.022 - Minimutn ~~idevar.d s~tback.
(~1 feet required for a builclinR wall
containiny windows; 10 feet proposed)
2. ~Tl~at thp above-mentioned waiv.~r iU
th~at there are special circumstances applicab:~ to~theby granted on the basis
shupe, topography, lncation or surro~andings, which dor~rot tapplyh to ether
identically zoned prapaxt;ea in tti~ vicinity; that strzct application of the
Zoning Ccde deprives t~~e ;~roperty ~g nrivileges enj~y~r~ b ok'r~er
identical zoninq :.las~ification in the vicinity. y proPertips itt
3• 't'hat there r,r~ exce~tionu~ or axtra~r.dinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to tihc property i,nvolved oc ~o the intended use of the
property th:~l• do not apply yenerally eo the pro~~erry or class of u;ce in the
same vir.•inity and zone.
4• ~'har ~fl(' rec;uesr~~ v.ar. xance .1:~ nece~s,.K}~ ~OC rhf~ c ;
and ~enjoyment ot ~: substantial pxoPt~ty ri.,~ht possAs~ed h L~re,~ervat_on
the ~ame vicinit,y an~+ •r.onE, an~ dcn:ed to ~h~ p~~p~rty fn y°~her property iri
:~ue~tion.
`-~• That the rQquFS~ed vaxiance will nol bc mateciall d.
to tne ~aublic weltare or injur.ious to the Y eerimental
v.icinf ty ar~d 2one in whici, Che ~ ~ ~=0~'eC ~y °r i:nnrovernents in 3uch
{~rapec,.y i~ locat?•3.
b• 'L'hat one per~;on inciicated th~~ir prese7ce ~t S~~id ~
fn ~ppoi:i~ion: and thar. n~ corrt~~{~onder~ce was re~.etved ~n o~'~'lic he.tti.ng ;
subjec~ ~;Ctitir~n. ~poHit.ton to `
MU:62r
PC~39-38
~'~~j ~ ,
LNVIRO~IMEN'SAL .1MPAC'r ['IN.U:[NG: 'Chat the Anaheim City l~.lanniny
Cotnmission has revi.ewed r.r-e pro~~osal ~o reclassi£y subject pro~erl•y from L•~~~p
RS-72UU (Re~idenCia.l, Single-~'amily) Zon~~ ~o L-h~ RM-240U (Residentia.l,
Mu1L•iple-Fami:Ly) 'Lone L•o construc~ a du~.lex with waivEr of m:ir~imum sideyard
sekb~ack un a recl•angularly-shapec~ parcel or lancl consi:~t:ing of approximate~.y
O.1G acre, t~,~ving a Eront~~e of approximaLely 5U Leet on the e~s~ side ~L-
[iarding Drivc, ~nd further ciescriued ay _l2~ Sc~uth ~iarding 1)rive; and da~:s
here~~y a~prove tl•ie t~egative DeC].aCdtioll upon findine~ that. it has considered
the Ne~aL-ive Aeclarar.i.ori toyether wilh ~any comments receivecl dtaring tt,e public
revie~a proc:ess and £urther. Einc~ing on the b~:sis of t:he inii:i~l study and any
comments received that theGe is no substanLill evi.dence that the project wi11
have a signific~nt efkect on the envix'onmPnt.
NOW, THEREHOkG, BE I'i' RFSOLVED t.hat the ~naheim Ci.ty Planning
Commission does hereby qranl• subjer.t Petition f~r V~riance, u~ori the fallowing
condition:: c+~t~ict~ are hereby found to be a neces~ary prer~~quisite to the
proposec~ use of the subjeck propcrty in order to F~re~erve the safety and
general w~lfare oL- the Citiz~:ns oF tlie City ot An~heim:
1. That prior to issuance of a bui:ldinq ~~ermit, aE?propriate park and
recrea~ ian in~lieu fees sha11 be pa~d lo the City oF Anaheim i.n an
amount as determ.ined by khe City Couricil.
2. T1:3t prior L•o issuance oF a builc~ing permit, the appropriate traffic
signal aasessment fee ;~hall be ~~aid tn the City of. Anaheim in an
atnount as determine:ci by the Cxty Council for ~ach new dwelling unit.
3. 'I'hat all engineeriny requiremencs of the City oL- Anaheitn a.long
Hardi.ng brive, includin~ prep~ratior~ of improvEment plan~ and
i.nstzllati.on ot a11 improvements such as curbs, sidewalks; street
grading and ~avement, sewer and drainage Pac.ilitie~, or oth~r
appurtenant work sha11 be cam~?ied wiLti as r~qui.ted by thE City
Enyine~~r an~l ii~ accord~nce with speaiPications on file in the Office
of. Lhe City Engineer; and tt,at securi.ty in the form oE a bond,
certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or ^ash, in an ~~maunt and
form satis~actory to the City of AnaP-eim, sha11 be posted with the
Ci.ty to guar~7ntee the satisfactory completion of. s.~id improvements.
Said security sha.ll be posted with the C.tty prior to approval oE
improv~_ment ~~la~ts, tu guaranL•ee t:h~~ inskallation of Lr~e
abovP-required improvemerit~ pri~~r to occupancy.
4. That drainage of S11bjc~Ct nroperty shall be dispo~Pd of in a manner
satisl:actary to the City En~ineer; includi~y C;~at, the ~arport roofs
and all c•~ment pads and ~iciv~., ya shall be d~~iyned so as to
prec.lude any run-off water Erum clraining onto any ar~jacent ~r.dperl•y.
5. `I'hat• thi~ Variance is yrantnd _.:;~jecL Lo the com~letion oE
Recla~:sifics,tion No. 83-84-20, n~w pendi~~u.
6. That subject nrapwrty shal.l be dc~velo~ed sub,tan~iall,y in ~3ec~rdance
with pl~n~ an~ sp~ciCicatiun:~ on E;le wi~h the Ci~y of Anan~im
:~arkEd ~xhibit No~. 1 tFrou~t; 3.
7. . That ~.~ri~r to final. bu;..lding and zoni.ng inspectiun~, Condirfo~
~ioa. ~ anJ :, above-~nent:.ioned, ~h,~.ll be compli~d with.
-2-
PCFi4-38
~
",~, , .
sE I7~ E'UftZ~HLR KFSULVEll thaL• the Ar~aheiii; Cit•.y P:l.rznni.n~ Commission
daes t~ereby tind and rle~ermirie th~at adoptioii of this Reso.lution .iy expres~ly
r~redicatEd up~n ~ppl.ic~-tnt's comp.liance with cach and dll o.~ the cc~ndition~
her.Einabove ~et; F.ortla. Shou].d any ;;uch condi.tion, or any part thcr~of, be
declar.ed ~.nvalic~ or unenf.occeab].~ by ~he £in~1 judg~nen~ o£ any court oE
rompet~nt jurisdiction, i:hen th.i:~ Resulution, and any a~pr.~va1:~ h~rPin
cantained, shall be cleerned null anc9 v~id.
'.i'HE FpRGGOItdG FtESOLU't'ION is ,igned and appr.c~ved by me this 22nd day oF
i~ebruary, 1984.
./~~/f,~.~ -=~~,~C ""'y'-~ ~ ~-~.
=--~L.J~G
CHATR4vOM}1P~, ~ ~FIEIM CITY PLANNI:NG COMMI~SSTVN
A'i'TEST : ~
~ ~ ~ '
-- - ~ 2~._~...
SEC~.~:xARY, ~.NAyCIM ~I'PY PLANN~NG COb1Ml'SSION
STATE OA' CAi~iFURNIA )
COUNTY OE ORANGE } ;;s,
CI7'Y OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. FIarris, Secretary of the Anaheim ~:ity Planriing
Commissi.on, d~ hereby certify that tt~e ~oi;egoing reuolutiun was passed and
aclo~ted at a meeting of l:he Anaheim Ci.tv Pl,anning Commission held on FPbru~ry
22, 1984, by the fol.lowing vote of the rnemt~e~:s thereof:
AYES: CUMMISSiONEftS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, K_TNC;, I,A CLAIR~, MC f3URNEY
NOE:: COMMISSTONE]tS: iJONE
AI3SEN'1': CQMMZSSTONERS: E'RSi, !-iERBS'['
IN WITN~SS WHEHEUE, I have hereunto set rny ha:~d this i?.nd dav of
Fet~ruary, 1984.
''C~~~ ..C: ~ .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C:['i'Y PLANNtNG COMMISSIOt~
~3~ PC84-3f3