PC 84-40RGSULU'1'IUN N0. PCFt4-~}0
!1 RESOL,U'~ION Or 'i'HE ANAHETM CITY F'LANNING CC)MMISSTO J
THA~' PE']'~1'ION 1~OFt VARIAPIC.L N0. 3379 BE (3kANTC.ll
WHFI2EAS, t:he Anaheim City Plannii~~ i:ommission clid rE~ceiv~: a veri.fied
l~etition Pc~r Vari.ance S:rom JOSE QUENG `i'IAMZON & FEGTCITAS B. T:fAMZON, ].031
No:th Baxter. SL•reet, Anaheim, Califa~nia 92~U5, o~oners oF cE:rtain r.eal
property situated ~n the Ciry of 1lnaheirn, County of. Orang~, S+~at:e o£
Ca].iLcrnia described as:
LUT 124 C)[' T12ACT N0. 8IIh6, AS PI~.R MAP RECQRD~ll IN BOOK 38?
PAGL; 4! TO 50 INC.LUSIVE 4F MISCCLLANEOUS MAPS~ IN Tf~E OFFICE
OF Ti~IE COUNTY RFCURDFR QE SI:Ill COUNTY.
WHEFtEAS, the City Planning Cornnissiun did hold a public h~aring at
the Civic Center in the City of Ana.he.im on February 22, 1984, ai: 1:3U p.m.,
notice of .;aid public tiearing haviny been duly given as rFquired by law ~nd in
~ccordance with the ~rovi~ion~ of t:~e Anaheim Municipal Cod~, Chapt.er 18.03,
to hear. ai~c9 consicler evidence for and a~ainst sai.d proposed variance and to
int~~stigate and mak~ findings anci recommendations in connecti~n tr~erewith; and
WHEREAS. said Cornmissia~i, after due inspecl•i.on, investigation and
study made by iL-self and in its behalf, and ~f'ter c1u~ cotis;.deration of all
evidence anci Lepo~:ta oFfered a~ said hearing, cioes ~i.nd and ~etermine the
tol].owinc7 facts:
].. `I'hat the petitic,r~er proposes a wa.iver uf the fo].lowing to
construct a r.oom adc]a.wiun:
SECTION 18.2I.06; .020 - Nlaximum l.ot covErage.
' (35$ mar,imum permit~ed; 43~ proposed)
2. Tha~ th~ abovP-mentionea waiver i~ eertby granted on the basis
that there are special circumstanc~s applicab.le to the pc•operty such a~ size,
sk~ape, topography, locat.ion or surruundin~7s, whi.ch do not apply to orl•~er
id~ntically zoned properties in the vicinity; r~nd that strict application of
the Zoning Code cleprives thP propert,y of pr~vileges enjoyed by other
properties in i~Jentical zoning classification in the vicin.iky~
3. 2'hat therF are exceptional or ex.traor.dinary circu~st.ances or
conditions appli~able to ihe property involved or L•a the :intenc3~d use ot the
prope._y that do not apply ~enerally to the pr.operty or cl.ass o.` us~ in the
same vicin'ty and zone.
4. That the requested variance i:: necessary E~r the p--eservation and
enjoyrrient of a subst~ntial prop~rty right possessed by other ~roperty in th~
same vicini.ty and zone, artd denied ta the F~roperty in queslion~
5. '~i~at the requested vari.ance wi11 not b~ mater.i~lly detrimential to
th~~ pub.l?c r~ellar~ or injurious to thP ~~toperty or improvement.. in such
v~~.cinity and zone in whicn the ~roperty is located.
6. That no one i:-dicatecl their presenc~ :it said ~ubiic hearir.y in
op~osition; anc? that no corr~spondence was received in c.~ppo~it.ion to s~bject
pe..ition.
~0164r PC84•-40
,,,,ti ~-~
~NVIRt~NMEN'rAL IMPAC:`I' F:IND'lNG: Tt~~ Planning DirecL-ar ur his
authoriz~d representative has determincd that the pro~osed projecic falls
wzthin the definition of C:ategorical Exempl-ions, C1uss 5, as def:inec~ in the
State ETR Guidelincs and a.s, khere.forn, categorical.ly exempt ~rom the
req-airernenl• l:o prepare ~n E;TFt.
Nc~W, 7'HEREFOItF~, AE IT REaOLVED t:h~t the Anahei.m City Planning
Commi; sion cioes hereby grani: subjeet Petition .Lor Variance, upon the fol].owi.ny
candi~ions which ar~ r,~r.~~~y found to be a necessaty preceqt:is+.te ta the
pr~posed use oP th~ subject ~roperty .in order h;; preserve the safety and
general wEl.fare of the Citiz~ns of khe City of An~i~,im:
1. Th~~t sub;ect property shall b~ developcad ::ubstantially in accordance
with plans ar.d specific:atians oii file with the City of Anahei.m
mar.lced Exhibit No. 1.
2. Ttiat prior I.o fin~~l bui'lcling and zon.ing inspections, COi1C31t1.011
No, 1, above-men~iuned, sk~a11 be complie~3 H~ith.
BE IT FURTH~R 12ESOLVED that the Anaheim rity Planning Commission
doES hereby firid and determine tha~ adoption ot I:his Resoluticn is expressly
predicated upur~ applicant's compli~nce with each and a1.1 of +:h~ conditions
k~erei.riabove set forth. ,Shou.ld any such condiL•ian, or any part therPOf, be
r~eclared invalid or unPnforc~:able by the f~iiU~ judgment of any r.ourt of
com~etent jurisdiction, theri this Resolution, and any approva]s nerein
contained, shall be deemed null ~nd void.
TEIE FOREG~JIN~ RESOLU'i~ION is signed and approved by me this 22nd day o£
February, 1984.
_ ' ~~~ GC.L ~-__~ /.,~'~~~4''•-~.-~'
CHA1~t1N, H~:CPi CITY PT_,ANNING ~OMMISSION
ATTES7';
~-~-~ .~°_ .~'~~~~.
SECRETAkY~ ANAHEIM CT'.['Y^':.~LANNING COMMTSSION
STATE OF CALI~'ORiVIA )
COUNTY nF CRANG~; ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEINI )
T, Fdith I.. Harris, Se~Xetary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certiiy tha~ tr~e foregoiny resoluticn was pas~ed and adopted at a
meeting o.E the Anaheim City Planning Cumm.ission hElc~ on rebruary 22, 1984, by
the f-ollowing vote of. the members ther~of:
AXES: COMMISSIONERS: $OtiAS, l3USHORE, KI~]G, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNFY
NOES: COMMISSION~RS: NONE
F,BSEN'r: COMMISSION~RS: FIZY, HERBST
IN WI'~N~,SS FIHEREUF, I hav~ hereun o set tny hand this 22nd day of
Februar~, 1984. ~~ ~ -~
, .~itn~~
SEC12F'TARY, ANAHEIM CIT'1 PLANNING COMMISSION
~2_ PCa4-40
'F.~r.'' .: ~c . ~ : ';~~