PC 84-41~~~.~
KESOL,UTTI~N N0. PCF34-41
A kk;SOLU'PION UF '.PHE :~1NAHEIM CI`~1: ~'LANN2NG COMMISSION
TEIAT PE`I'I'1'IUN FOR VAkIANCE N0. 338Q T3C GRANTED
WHFREAS, the Anah~i~n C.ity Pl.anninc~ C~mmi.ssion c7id receive a vErified
P~tition tor Var.ianr,~ from JO~QUIN SUEIRO & AGNES 5. ~IATL, 1909 Deer Creek
Circle, Anaheim, CaliL-ornia 92807, owners, and CASEY B. JURAD~~, 2821 W;~~testar.
Ave-1ue, ~C, Anaheir~i, California 928U6, agent of cer.~ain real property situated
i-1 the City of Anaheim, County of U.range, Stat.e of: CaliCornia c7escribed as:
LO`1' NO. 20 O.F T.RACT N0. 7G76 AS PLR M:~P RECORll; D IP] BOOK 297
~T,GES 15r 1G AN.D 17 OF MISCGL,LANEOUS MAPS IN T'TC OFFICE O[' THE
CUUNTY RECURDGR OI' SAID COUN'P`.C.
WHEREAS, ti~e City Planning Cc~mmission did hold ~ public hearir.~g a~
the c.ivic Ceriter in the City oF Anaheim cn Ee~r•uary~ 22, 1984, at 1.30 p.m. ,
notice af said p~iblic hearing t~aving l~een duly yiven as requi.red by law and in
acc~rdance with `~.h~ provisions of t}~~e Anahei~n Municipal Code, Chapter 1C.03~
to hear and consider evicience for an~l against said proposed vari~3nce and to
investigate and make findings and recommendati.on~ in connection therewith; and
WfiE~tEAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigatio~l and
stucly ~n~~dF by it~elf and in its behalf, and aftPr du~~ considexaf:ion oF all
evadence and reports oPfered at said hearing, does f:Lnci and determine the
tollowing #acts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a waiver of t.t~~ Collo~ding to
construct a roam addition;
SE::TI~N 18.27.06~ .01U - Maximum ].ot coverac~e.
(35$ maximum pErmitted; 43~ proposed)
2. '1'}~at the above-r~ent:i~ned waivec is hAreby granted on the ~asis
that there are sp~cial circ~.imstances applicable tc~ the praperty such as si.ze,
sha~?e, toprgraphy, locati~n or surroundings, wi:ich do IIOt apply to other
idQntically zoned propf,r~ies in th~ vicini~y; that stricr applical;ion of the
Znnirg Code depri~~es the propert~l of privileges enjo,yed by o±her properties in
identical zcning classa.ficati.on in the vi.cinity.
3. That the:e are exceptional or extraord.i.nary circumstance:; ur
conditions applicable to the pZOpert.y .involv~d or to the intended use of the
pro~erty that do not apply yerierall.y t~ the prap~cty or ~.lass of use in the
same vi~ini~y and zone.
4. T~.at i:he requested variance is nece~;sary for the przservation
and ~nj~ymen~ of a substantial property right posse~sed by otl•ier ~coperty in
the same vicinity and zone, and den~ed to the pro~Prty in g~aestio~t.
5. That the r^quested variance w~ll not b~ -n~tc~rially d~~rirnentaJ.
to the pub~ic welf.arp or iiijuri~us ta the pr~~erty or impro~~ements in such
viciniL-y artd zone in which the propecty is locate~.
b. ~'hat no one indicated their ~resence at said pub~ic he~ring in
opposikion; and that nn corres~,ondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
#0165r PCS4-41
..• 1
.,,.~~\ ,,...,.
EIJVIRUNMGN`1'Ai~ ~MPACT _ I'TNDIN~~: '1'he Plannin~~ Dir.ector or his
auttaorized represF:nl-a~iv~ has c~eterrnined l-.h~t the pr~~p~sed project fall~
within the d~Eini~ian of Cateyorical Exemptxons, Cl~ss 5, as def:ined i.n the
State GIR Guidelinea and zs, therefore, categoric~lly exempi. fr.om the
rec~uiremer.t L-o pre~are ~n EI~t.
NOW, 'PH~REr'ORL•;, BL IT R~SOLVEG that the Ar.aheim City P:J.anning
Commission does hereby yr.ant subject Petition foz variance, upon the fo.llowing
conditi.onU whicYi arp hereby found t.o be a necessary preG~c~quisit~ to the
pzoposed use o~ the subject pro~erty in ~rder to preserve the safety arid
gEtieral welfare oC L-he Citizens of- the City of Anaheim:
1. Th~t subjc-ct property shall be develo~ec] subsi:antiaily in accordance
with plans and specifications on Fi.le with L-he City af Anaheim
n;ark~d Exhibit No. 1.
2. That prior to final building and zon~.iig in~pections, Condition
No. 1, above-mentionad. shall be comp.l.ied with.
BE IT I~UR'PH~:R RE;SOLVEll +-t.at the Anai~eim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determi.ne thar adopticn oP this Resrlution is expressly
predicatec~ upon applicant's .;ompliance with each anc~ ~11 of the eor,c3itions
hereinat~ove set torth. Should any such c~ndition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or ;anenforreablc by L-he fi.nal juclgment of any court of
compntent jurisdi~tion, tnen this Resolution, and any approvals i~erein
contained, shall be deemed c~u1i ~enc~ void.
THE FUREGOINC RGSOI.,U~'IQN is signed and apprcved by ine lhis 22nd day of
February, 1934. ~ ~ ,,
'~~ . % 'L-Lt-• ~..i . .JL~"'~.~cN---~~'
CHAIRWOMF.N, AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTESZ'; ~ ' ~
~ ~~' `. .,~.~2~
SECFtETARY, ANAHr,TM CITY PLANNING COMMI:~STON
STATF OF CALIFURNIA )
COUNTY OF' ORANGE ) ss.
~ITX OF AtJAHEIM 1
I, Eiiith L. Harris, Secret~ry of the Anahe.:m City Planning
Commission, do heret~y certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted ak a meeting of ~~Y-e An«heim City Planni.ng Commission }Ze1d on Febraary
~'l, 1984, by the following vote o= L-he nernbers thereof :
AXES: COMNIaSI0NER5: BOUAS, BU~kIORE, KING, L~A CLtIIRE, MC BURNFY
I30ES: COMM:ISSION~RS: NONF
AE3S~N'1': COMMISSIONERS: FRX, I{ERBST
YN 4vITNESS 4JHFRE;UE', I have her~~into set my h~n~ fhis 22nd day of
~'ebru.xry, 1984.
_.~.~_~1 ~.~:.~~ iC ~ ~/,, '
___-~'f~~-~
SCCRC'~ARY, ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNING COMI9ISSXON
'2- PC84-41