PC 84-45:r~
RGSO'LUTI:UN NU. L~C$4-~5
A RESULU'i'tUN OF THE 7~NAHEIM CITY PLANN2NG COMMISSION
'1'HAT PF`l'ITION F'OR CUNDITTODlAL USE PERNT'i' NG. 2508 BE GRANTE.D
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did teceive a ver.if9.2d
Petition fo~ Condi.tional Use Perrnit Erom EQUTTEC 80 R~AL ESTATE INVESTORS,
P. O. Bax 1.10~, .Lafayette, CaliFornia 9~549, owner, and L~AWRENCE P. BELLOMO,
18952 Mac Arthur Boulevard, Suit~ ;.00, Irvine, California 92715, agent ~.~~
certain real proper.ty situatec] in the City of Anah~im, County o~ Orange, State
uf California, described as:
'!'HA']' POFZ7.'IVN OE' THE NORTHEAST QUARTGR t~F SECT?ON 26, TOWNSHIP
4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAtd CAJOy DE SANTA
ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECOF2DE]) IN BOQK 51, PAGE lU OF
MISCEi,i,i,NE0il5 MAPS~ RECORDS QF ORANGE COfJNTY, CALTL'ORNIA~
llESCRIBGD AS FOL,LOWS:
PARCEL ~~ AS SHOWN QN A MAP RECOI2D~D IN BOOK 81o PAGES a2 OI'
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE Qr,[~ICE OE THE COUN~Y RECORDER OF SAID
ORANGE COUNTY.
WH~HEAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hear:ng at
the Civic: Center in the City of Anaheim on Mar.ch 5, 19a4, at 1:3U p.m., nokice
uf said publi.c hearing having been uu.Zy giv~n as required by 1aw and in
accoidance with the provisions of khe Anaheirn Munir.ipal Code, Chapter. 18.03,
to hear and consid~r evidence fQr and against said propasec] condi.tional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and rerommendations in connection
therewith; anl
WH~REAS, said Comniission, aiter duE inspectio~~, investigation and
s~.udy mad~ by i~self and in its berialf, and after due consideration of all
evic3enc~ and re~ports offerer] at said r~earing, does firid and determin~ ~he
following facts:
l. That the proposea use is properly one Cor which a conditional
use peLmit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sec:tion 18.03.U3Q.010 &
18.06.080 to wit to permit a retail baseball card shop in the ML" (Tndustrial,
LiinWted) 7one with waiver of:
SECTIONS 18.06.05Q.p22 ~ Alinimum number of narking spaces
AND 18.61.G66.050 (671 s ac~s required; 5io spaces ,pro osed)
2. That the request~d waiver. is hereby grante~] on thE basis that
~here ar~ special ci.rcumstances anp.l.icable to the propPrt,y such as size,
shape, topography, l~cation or surroundings, which do iiot apply ~o other
identically zoncd properkies in the vicinity; and that strict application of
the Zoning ~ode dEprives t:he property o~ privileges enjoyed b~• other
proper~ies in i~lentical zoriing classification in the vicinit~y.
3. ~~hat the proposed use wil.l noi: adversely aff.ect the adjoining
~and uses and the gro~ath and d~vPlapment of the area i.n which it is pro~o~~d
to be locat~d.
~0171r PC84-45
''"'1
~
~~ That the size and shape of the site pro~os~d :Eor the use is
adequate to allow the Eu11 dev~lupment a£ the pro~osed use in a tnanner r-ot
detrim~;ntaJ. to t:he pa.rticular ~rea nor L-o ~he peace, health, safety and
general w~lfar.c of ~.Y~e Cit.izens ot tt~n Cii:y of A:ial~~c~.im.
5. ~h~~t the granting of the Conditional Use Permi.t under l-he
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detriment~l to l:lie p~ace, health,
safety and general we.l~are of the Citize-1s of the City o~ Anat~eim.
6. That the traftic generated by the propos~d use will not im~ose
an undue burd~ci upon the streets and highways designed and impro~ved to carry
the traftic in the ar~a.
7. That no one indicated Lheir presence at said public hearing in
op~~osii.ion; and that no cerrespandet~ce was receivEd in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRONhi~NTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim (:ity Planning
Commission has r.eviewed i:he proposa~ to per.mit a retail baseball card shop ;in
th~ ML ( Indtastra.al, Limited) Zone witl; wai.ver oP minimmm ~umber of park~.ng
spaces on a rectangulaLly-sha~ed parcel o~ land consisting of approximately
18.9 acres located at tihe southwesi: corner of Dacifico Aver.ue ~nd State
Colleg~ Boul~vard (1973 Sou~h State College Bculevard); and does herek~y
approve the Neyal-ive Declarati.on upon findin~7 tha~ it has consic~ered the
Negative Declaration i~ogether with any cr~mmen~s received during the public
revi.ew process and fur.ther finding on ~he basis of the initial study ~nd any
comments received L•hat there is no sut~stantial evidenr.e that tt~e pr.oj~ct v~i.ll
have a signiticant effec~ an the envi.ranrnent.
NOW, TEIFREFORE, L~E: .iT FtESOLVED thar. the Anaheim City Plan:iing
Commission cioes hereby grant subjerh Pet.ition L-or Conditional Use PPrmit, up4n
the following conditions whic;h are hereby found ta be a necessary prere~uisite
to the proposed use af t!~e subj~ct pr~perty ir. order to prEServe th~ safety
and yener~~l. welfare oi the Citiz~ns af the Cit.y of Anahei.m:
1. That due to the change in use and/ar occupancy ot the building,
~lans shall be submitted to th~ Building Division showing cornpliance
with the minimum standards o:E th~ City o~ A.nahcim, including the
UniForm Bui:lding, ~lumbing, Electr~.cal, Meci~anical and Fire Codes as
adopted by the City of Anahei.m. The appropriate permits shall b~
obtained for ~any necessary work.
2. That prior ~o issuance of a building permit, a traffic sig~1~I
assessment fee egualing the difFerence hetween the i.nduskrial and
commercial assessment f.ees sha11 be paid ta the City of Ar~aheim in
an amount as determined by the City Council.
3. That subject pr~perty shall be develnped substantially in acc~rdance
with plans and soecifications on file with the City of I~naheim
markad ~:xhibir Nos. 1 and 2,
4. That the proposal st,a11 comply with all signing requirements ~i the
ML (Indus~rial, Li.mited) Zone.
_2.
PG84-45
-- ~
a --
,~~,
~~,
5. That Concii~ion Nos. 1 througl~ 4, above-mentioned, shall be completed
wikhin a perioci af 60 days from th~ daLE of L-hi.s resalukion.
BE IT FUR2'ElER RESULVED that the Anaheim City Planni.ng Commission
doES hereby .firid and c~~tercnine that acloption of this Resolution is expressly
prEdicated upon applicant:'s compliance with each and all of khe condi.tions
hereinabove s~t forth, Should any such conditions, or any parL• theteof, be
c~eclared invalid or ur~enf~rr_eable 5y the fir~~l judgment oF any court of
compeLent jurisciiction, th~n this Resalution, and a.riy ap~LOVals herein
contained~ sha.l7. be deemed null and void.
THE FORGGOTNG RESOLU`1'IOC~ is signed and appraved ~y me this 5th day
of March, 19$4.
~r~ '/f ~
`l'•i ~'~'~ r~f ,~..~r:. ~-~'-r~!.~_~
~
CHAIRWOMA~3, ANAHEIM CI'I"1 PLANIVING COMMISSION
~
ATTES'.C : ~ ~~
~,? ~%i C~lc, f J / t1-~.%L ~. -L 2
SECkE'.I'ARY,~ ANAEIEIM CITY PLANNING CbMMISSIQN
ST.A:I'~ OF CALT_FOIZNIA )
COUNPY OF' ORANGF ) ss.
CITY Or' ANAHEIM ;
1, Eciith L. EIazris, Secr.etary of the Analzeim City Planning
Cornmissiou, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was Dassed ancl
«dn~ted at a meetir,g of the Anaheim City Plannirig C~ammissior~ held o~i March 5,
1984, by the ~ollowinq voi:e of the member.s th?reof:
AYES: COMMI~STONERS: BOUAS, BUSFiORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE
N~ES: COMMISSION~RS: NONE
AHSEN'r: COM[dI.S~~TUNLRS: MC BURNEY
TIV W:CTNE~S WHCFt~OF~ I have hereun~~ set my hand this 5th day of
r9arcr,, 19A4.
~.~' ~ x..~ .
, ---1 ~ ~,
~,.~C ..~= ~.. -~ ~ ~ . ~!~'ir~c..~~
SECkETARY, Af7aHETM CITY 'f~LANNING COMMISSIC.?N
-'~- PCB~-45
~',