PC 84-51~ ~
RrSOLU'1'TUN N(:). PC84-51
A RESOLU~l'IUN UF '.t'HE ANAHGIDI CI'i'Y PI~ANNTNG CQMM:ISSJON
7.'HA`l' PFT1:'Z'IUN TUfi VARIADICE N0. 3382 I~E GRANTED, IN PAR'.P
WH~Rf3AS, i:t-ie ~nahei.m CiL-y ~lanniny Cornmission dic! receiv~ a vezif.ied
~~eti~ion ior Var.iance Erom h1YlJtJG-SH:IK YUN ~rin ICUM OK YU~I, 7?.7 South t3~ach
F3oulevard, Anaheim, Cal.ifor.nia 92t304, owners of certain rr-_a1 ~roperty situated
in the Cit,y ~f Anahei.m, County of Orange, State of California dcscri~a~d as:
PAFtCELS 1~ 2, & 3 OF' PARCEL MAP N0. 79-275, ?N THE (;ITY OF
ANAHETM, AS P13R f4AP FILLll IN BOOK :154, PAGES ~7 :,ND 48 OF
PA.k~rL MAPS, TN THG OFIICE GF THE COUNTY RECORDGR UF SAID
COUNTY,
WHF;REAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Ciui.c Center in the City of An~heim on Mar~h 19, 193~, at 1:30 p.m.,
nolice of• sa.i~ public f~earing haviny been duly given as requir.ed by law and in
accor.dance ~va.th the provisions af the Anaheim Munic:ipal C:~de, Chapter ].8.03,
to he~r and co~nsider evidence for and against sa.id praposed variance arld to
investiaate and make findings ~~~d r.ecommendatior~s in co~-ra~ction ti:erewith; ar_d
WHEkF:AS, saicl CrR~mission, a.fter dua inspection, investiyation and
study made by ikselt and in its behalf, and after. due consideration uf al'1
evi~ence zncl repor.t~s otfered at ~aici hearing, does find anc~ determine the
f~llowin,y facts:
1. That the ~etitioner proposes ~aaivers ~f tt~e~ follo~•~ing to retain
a freestanaing sign and an entrance canopy:
(a) SLCTIONS .l8_._05.u93.U241 - Maxirrum sign heighl-.
AND 18.~~.U67 (?.5,.Eeet permitted within 750 f~et of.
re~idential zonir~g; 43 fe~t existing
at approxi.mately 300 feet)
(U) SGCTION 18.44.U63.010 - Minimum scructural setback.
~rr~ (lU feet required for entrance canopy;
2 feet exish.inq )
2. 'rhat the above-mentioned waiver (a) is hereby denied on tr,e
basis that L•he si.gn was .:anstrur,ted exceeciing the height specified ori the
buildiny permit issued by the Buildiny Diviaion; an.i i:hat strict applic:ation
of the zoriing Code do~s not deprive l-he pro~.~erty of privi:legps enjoyed by
o~.her pror~erti~s in identical zoniny classi~ical-ion in the vicinity.
3. That thF• above-meritior~ed waiver (b) is hereby granted un the
bas.is that there are :~pecial circumstances applicable to the pr~perty su~h as
size, shape, tapograpP,y, locatiori and surroundings which clo not apply tu other
identicall.y zor~ed pruperty in the same •ricinity; ~nd ~hat strict application
oE the Zoning Code depr.ivPS the properfy af pri.vileges enjoyed by other
properti~s in the identical z~ne and classificati~n in the vici.nity and
~ubject to Interc~epar.tmerttal Committee recomrren~ations.
#U177r PC84-51
`;
::~':a~;~
`'';~`e
4. That there are exc:eptional or ex~raordin~ry circumstances or
cor.~i~ion~ applicablP t,o the pro~erty invo.lved or to the intende~l use of the
property tha~ c1o noL• apply gnnera.lly to t;:~ property or class of us~ in ~he
same: vic:ini.ty and zon~.
5. 'I'hat th~ reque:~ted variance i~ necessary f:nr L•he preservatio,n
and er:;joyrr~~c7t af a substant.ial ~.~roperty right gossesUed by other propert•~ in
the same vicin~~y anc] zone, and denied tc, thc pr.opert-.y in question.
6. That. ~he rcquested variance will not be mal•erially detrimenta].
to the public welfar~ or injur,iou:~ i:o tk~e property or improvements in ::uch
v~cinity and zone in wl~icti thc proper~~ i~ locai.ed.
7. That no one indicated Lh~air. pres~nce at said public hearing in
oppo..ihion; and tha'c no corr~sponderice was Cec~ived in opposition to subject
petii:ion.
ENVII2UNNENTAL IM~ACT F:INllING: The Planning Di.r.ector or tlis
authorized representative has determ..ined ~hat `hs proposed pro.ject falls
within the definition ot Categoric~l E~xempi:i.ons, Class 11, as defined in the
State EIR Guide].ines and is, tht:refarc, categoric~lly exempt from the
requirem~nt to prepar~> an GIk.
NUW, Z'EiLREt'OR~, f3E; IT RESOLVED that the Anaheiru Ci~y Planning
Cammission does hereby yrant sul~ject Per.ition for Variance, upun the following
conditions which ar~: hereby found to be a n~cessary prerequi.site to the
praposed use of th~ subject property in order to preseLVe the sa£ety and
general welfare of the Citizens of ~h~ City of Anahei.m:
1. That pla~ts sha11 be subrnit~ed to the T3ui1~]ing Di.vision showing
compliance with Lhe minimum stelndards oF the City of Anaheim,
inc].uding khe Uniform Builc7ing, Electrical, Mechanic~l ancl Fire
Codes as adopted by L-he c;.ity of Anaheim. The appropri.at~ ~ermits
shall be obtained for any necessar,y work.
2. 2'hat tkie owner of subject properi:y : hal.l submit a letter requestiny
Lermination of Uariance Nc. 3092.
3. Ti~at subjecL• property shall be d~veloped substantial.ly in accordance
wi~Y~ plans and specificatzons on file ~,~zth thE City of Anaheirr
marked Exhibi~ Nos. 1 through 3; pr.ovided, however., that t'tie height
of the freestanding sign as sk~~wn ~n the plans shall be reducec3 to
twenty-Eive ~e~t in compliar~ce with maximu~n t~eight requirements of
the I~naheim Municipal Codz.
4. That Condition Nos. 1 through 3, above-mentioned, shall be completed
withi.n a period ~f 60 aays ~rom the date of this resol.ution.
II~: I'P FURTHLIt RESOI~VED thak the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine th~zt ~r~opLion of this Resolution is axpressly
predicated tapon applicant'~ compliance witii each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Shou.ld any such condition, or any nart thereo£, be
declared xnvalid or unenforceable by the Final judgment of any court of
competent j~irisdiction, then this Resoluti~n, and any approyals herein
ccntained, shall. be deemed nu11 and vo~d.
-2- YC84-51
2'HE E'OREUOING RESOLUTION is signed anC appr.ovtd b,y me this 19th day
of March, 1)r3~}.
,
'~ C~~ . ~ •~~.r~,,,L,~
---.-_____._.--
CHAIRWUM ~ ANAHE:CM (:IT1' F'LANNING COMMIaSION
ATTFST: ~ /^
`-(' ~ ` .i
r~ ,f~ j~t..Z~z,
~BCR~TAI2Y, ANAHLIM CITX PLANNIIVG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFpRNTA )
COUNTY OF Oi~ANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harxis, Secretary of the An~heim City Planning
Commission, do h~reby certify tl~at the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopt~d at a rreeting of the Anahei.m City Planning Commission hcld on March I4,
.198~}, I~y the followiny vate of the members thereo.f :
AYES: COyMTS8I0N~RS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FkY, HEF2BST, KINU, LA CLAIRE,
MC BURNEY
NU~S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CObiMTSSIQNERS: NONL
IN WITN~S:' WHEREGI', I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of
March, 19840
~ l~
%) ~~~r-'Gc.~ . .~1/L-~ ,..
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PZ~ANNING COMMTS,~TON
t
~
j.
a
i
~.
s
-3~ PC84-51