PC 84-6,~p~~
R~SOLU~i':ION NO. PCBh-6
r'"~"4,
A HESOLIITION OF `l'H.E ANAHE:CM CI'i'Y PLANNING COMh1ISSI0D1
'.I'HA:I' PE`.PITION FOR VARIANG~ NQ. 3367 BE GRAN'i'ED
WHERLAS, tk~c Anah~im City Planniilg C~mmission did receiv~ a ver.i£i~d
Petition for Va.r_iance Er.om GENEIlAL AME;RICAN LIF'F INSURANCE CONiPANY, 1630 Sou~h
Sunkist Street, Suite B, Anahei.m, Califor.n.i.a 92a06, ownez of cer.ta9.n -:eal
pr.oper.t~j situated :in the City of Anaheim, County of pr.ange, 5tate o~
Califor.~lia desczib~c] as:
PARCELS '14 AND 15 = 1555 SOU'PH SINCJ~KTR, AS SHQWN O[~' A MA}?
EILED ZN ~'~OOFC 167.~ PAGES 27 `C~ 31 INCLUSIVE UI' PARCGL MF.P;'i
1N TH~ QC'FICE OE' T.HE COUN'1'Y RECG~~DEIt GF OI~.ANGE; COUrITY~
CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold z~~uhli.c hear.ir.g at.
the Gi.va.c CentQr. ;~~n the City of Anaheirr on Jantaur.y 9~ 193~., at 1:3U ~.m.,
notice c~f said pub?ir~ riear.i.no h~ving bcen duly giver~ as tec~ui~~~d by la.w and in
accor.da~rice with the provisi.ons of the Anaheim Muni~~ipal Code~, Chapter. 18. U3,
to heaz and considel: evicience f~~~ and ayainst said pr.op~~seci var.ianc~~ and to
invest:i~~aLe and make findi.rig~ and recammenda!:ions in c;onnection ther.ewiti7; anc~
!n'[3EREAS, saici Commission, a1t. due inspecti~n, :investigation ~~nd
study m~~de by itseli: and in its t~ehalf, and after du~ cons:id~ratior~ of a17.
evidenr~e~ and r.epor.t~ otfered at sai.ci hearing, does find and deter.tninz the
follaw:ir~g facts:
1. That the pP~itioner ~?roposES a waiver of the fo7.lowing to
constr~:ct additional o~fice space k~itr~in an exiat?ng ind.ustrial building:
SE~~TI01' 18.06.05U.0'l12 - Minirnum numbhr. of parking space~.
1~.06.050.03] (147 apaces r.equir.ed; I3Q spaces pr~posed)
18.61.066.05U
2. 'I'hat the above-mPntior~ed waiver. is t:ereby gzanted on the basis
that th~ petitioner demanstrated that a har.d~hip Pxists in that the r.equeste:]
waiver is minimal; th~t the ~~:.k;.n~1 var.ianc;e w:il1 not cause an i.ncrease in
r~:aff.ic c:ongestion in the immediate vicinit,y n~r: advPrsely affect any
a~~joininy land uses; and that ~he gzanting of the parki~~g var.iance undPr khF•
conditions imposed if any wi.ll not be detrim~ntal to the pe~ice, healti~~, sa£ei:.;•
or. gene~.al welfaze oi the citizens ot the City of Ar~aheim.
3. That ther.e ar.~ es:ceptional or exl-.r.aor~inary c.ircumslanc~~ or
c.onditians applicable t~ l-he pro~er.ty involved or to the intended use o£ the
proper.l-y that d~ not apply gener.ally to the preper.ty or. cJ.ass oE u;e in th~
c~ame vicinity and zane.
4. That the :-equested vaziance is nec~ssar.y for. the pr.eservation
and enjoyrtient Qi a substant`al pr.pper.ty r..ight po~sesseci by other propezty in
l.he same vicinity and zonc, an~~ denied to the p~oper.ty in qu~stion.
PC84-6
#~130r.
,~aii~
5. Thah Lhe r.equesked varianc~ wi11 nt~t be mater.i~xlly d~i:ri.mental
ta i:hc: ~ublir. w~.lEare ~,~z in jur.ious Lo the pr,operi:y or. ;impr.pvements i.n such
yir.i.riity and ;sone in wY~i.cFi th~~ property is l~cated,
6. That na c~ne ir,dicated i:heir. ~~re~ence at s~aid public hear. ing in
oppo~ition; anc3 that nc~ car.zesponclen.^,e was r.ecPi.ved in oppositian to subjPCt
~etition.
ENVIKO~IMLNTAL IMPA~;'T FINDING: That the Anaheim Cit~,y Pla;nning
Cornmission has r.eviecaer.! the pr.oposal to c~~nstr.i:ict additional oFfice ;;pacta
within an exi~ting inilustr.ial building wi~th waiv~r. o£ rninimum numbEr c~f
paxking spaceti; on an ir.re~gularly-shape~ parc~l. of land consistinci of
upproximately 2.1 acres,, ha~i.ny a frontage c~i ar~k~raximatPly 340 feet on th~
wesu side of Sa.nc7.air ;;tl:e~t, and further cIescr.ibEd as 1!i55 South Sir.c::lair.
Stre~t; and does hexeuy appr.ove i.he Neg~tive Decl~r.ation upon i:inding thak it
hau consider.ed th~ Negati.ve Declar.ation together. tiv.ith any comments r.ece~ived
dut;.rig L-h~ public r.eviE~w pr_uces:~ ancl fur.L•her f.inding on th~ b~sis of the
ini~ial study and any cammenlra receivecl that i:her.~e is no subsk~nti.al evicencP
th~t the projeci. tuill hav~ a significant efifec~ on the envir.onment.
NOW, TH~REFORE, F3E IT RESOLVED L•hat ~he ~lnaheim City Plannir.g
Commission cloes her.eby arat~t :oubje~;~ Pekitiori f.or Vaziance, upon the following
conditi.ons whicr ar.e hF~r.eby foun~9 to bE a necessary pr.er.~quisite l-o thF
pco,pos~d use a.f~ the sut~ject proZ~a~rty in ord~r t•.o pr.eNer.v~ tt~e safety and
g~neral welfare of the Cit:izen,s of l:he City c~.f. Ailah~aim:
1. Tk~at ~~zi.or to ;.ssuance of a buLlding per.iuic, th~ appXC~pr:iate tr.afta.c
signal assessment ff~e shall be pa~.d to th~ City of An~h~im i.r~ an
amaunt. d~ter.mir~d by the City Counc:il Por l•.he ~ifFer.ence between the
commercial off:.ic~ aild industr.ial rates for. the fl.oar space bei.ng
remoae:ied Ezotn i.ndus~;:.r. ia1. to o~Eice uses.
.;. That .~ub ject p.~oper. r.r~ shall he developed substanLially in accnr.cla~icP
with plans anr~ sFecificakions on fil.e wa.th the C'ity c~f Anaheim
mar.kecl Gxhib,it No. 1.
3. That prior. to f.ine~l building and 2oning irispections, Conc9i.tion
No. 2, above-mc~ntioned, shall be camplied with.
BG IZ' ~'[JR.THE1~ RE50LVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commi~sion
cloes k~ereby fin.d 1nd de~er.mir~e th~t adoption nf thi~ Ttes~lut.ion is expr.essly
pxedicat~ec7 upori applicant's compliance with each <3ni] al.l af the cunditiun~
her.•einabove set. to-:th. Slzould ariy such conditiot~, or. any par.t ther.eof, be
declazed invalid or un~nfor.ceable by the final judgment o.f any court of
competent juri.sdicti~n, then thi~ Resolution, znd any approvals hF~c~2in
cuntained, ~ha7.7. t~e decmed n~ll.l and void.
THE ['OREGOIN~~ RESQLU`PION is signed a~~d appr.oved by me this 9th day
of Jsnuury, 1984.
,
:
~ %J ~ ! %` Z~~.4.~
~ % ~ ~~.~~~~ o~ ~
C;3AIRWOMApY~i;1NAHEIM C.T.T'Y PLANNtNG COMMI:;SION
ATTES~: ~~
~c~:~L+~ ~'~ '~'/ •
/~~it,~,..~~
SFCRETARY~, ANAHEIM CI'I'Y PLANiJTNG COMMISSII'~N
;~`il
-2- PC84-{
'tf~ ,
~ ~~ ~, ~ , : ;r~~;
fe~. F,.,,b' . ,.i._.. . .
uTAT~ OF (:ALlI'0}2NTA 1
C•OUN~.'Y O~' ORANGI3 ) SS ~
CTTY uF ,~NAHEIM )
I, Edi.th L~ Hazxi,s, Secr.c:l:ary o£ t:hf Anaheim City Planning
Commission, ~ao her.eby cexti~,y t-.~~at the faxegoirig resolution was passe~l ancl
ado~ted at ~a me~ting of khe Ariaheim City Planning Commission h~1~ on Jan~iar.y
~, 1984, by the fo7.lowinc~ voi:E of tkie mem{~e.r,s thezcoF:
AYF;Se COMNITSSIONERS: AOUAS~ BU~HORE~ EEtY, HERBST~ KING~ LA CLAIR~~
MC T3U'tZNEY
NOES: ~OMMISSIONERS; NONE
.ABSEIV'.[': CqMMISSIONEI?S; NI~NI:
IN WITNESS WtiEREOE~, T have hereunto set my hancl this 9th ciay of
January, 1984.
G~.z_~ _...-C.~ _ •
SECRE`.PAItY, AN1~H~IM C~ LANNI '
NG CUMMTSSION
-3- ~'C84-6