PC 84-85„i' c
i~~~~ ,~
~ r~„
:ii.,:.... ~ .
~
'
~ I~
kESOL~U`i'ION N0. PC04 85
A RF.SOT~UT:LON Oi ~rHE Af~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM7SSIQN i"
ADOF`t7NG ANU R E C U M M G N D I N G T O T H E C I' I' Y C OUNCIL QF THE CI'I'Y OF ANAHEIM
ADOPTTON OP' AN P.ME~NDM~NT x0 THE LANll USE ELEMFNT OF THE
GENERAL PLADI DFSIGNATED AS AM~NDMi~N`.~' N0. 188
WHEREASr the City Counci3. of the City oi Anaheim c~id adopt the
Canyon Area General Plan by Resalutiocl r1o. 77R.-168, showing th~ yeneral
description anci extent of possible future dcvelopment ~aithir- the City; arid
WHEFtEAS, pursudnt ta a req~~e~t fr~m the property owncr fc~r a GeneraJ.
Plan Amendment Study, CiL•y staff pr~par~d a General P7.an Amendment for an area
consisting of approximately 600+ acr~s boun~ed on the north by the Wa:11~c~
Ranch, west by Texaco--An~heim Hi17.s, Inc. property, and south and east by the
Irvine Ccmpany property; and
WHEREAS, the Planiiing ll~partmar-t c~eemPd it ap~,ropriate, pursuant to
the provisions of the California Lnvi.ronmental Qualit;y Act, tk-at an
envi1'onmeni;al impact report be preparecl and Er~vironmental impact ~teport No.
265 has been submitted; ~nd
WHERFAS, the Anahe.im C:ity ~'lanniiig Commission di.d hold a public
hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council C11amY~er, ?.OU aouth Anaheim
Boulevar.d, or~ April 3Q, 1984, at 1:30 p.m., notic~ of said gublic hearing
havin~ bPen duly given as r.equired by law ancl in accordance 4~ith the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consicler evidence for
and ayain~t saic~ Am~ndment tc~ the Anaheim Gen~ral Plan, Land TJse ElemenL-, atid
to inv~stigate anc9 make Eindings and recommendata.ons in connection therewiL•h;
ar,d
WH~KEAS, said Commission, aft.er_ d~z~ cor~si~~ratian, inspection,
investigation and study rrade by itself, ~nd after due consic~eratiun of all
evidenc~ and reports ~ftered a!: s~id public hearin~3, DOES HEREBY FIND:
1. '.Chat one (1) per~on indicated his interest in the
amendment ai: the public hearing.
2. That evi.dence was presented whic:h suUstantiiates
the r.eed f.or an amendment to the Canyon Area
General Plan, and it is deemed appropriate i:t~at
"Exr~ib9.t A" be adopte~3, desiynatiny thP property
as Hillside ~sl-.ate Density Residential, Hillsid~
Low Uensil-.y Residential, Hillsi.de Medium UF:nsity
Residential, Gener.al Commercial and Gener~l Ope:~
Space.
3. That the appro~~al does not automatic.ally
guarantee the d~avelopmQnL• of a rnaximum of 2,400
dwell:ing units. Ucider the aoprov~d General Pl.an
desa.gnations, the numbex~ of developable dwelliny
units would range f.r~m 0 t~ '1,400 uni~s.
PC84-85
~1115I
~~
NUW, THERGeORE, BG IT RESUI:,VED~ that aftFr c~nside_ing Arait
Environmenta:l Imp~-~ct Report No. 25, tor the ~roposed annexati~n and
developtnPnt of: Oak Hills kanch anc] reviewing evidence, b~th written and oral,
presented to supplern~nt llraft E:IR No. 265, the Planni.ng Comma.ssion finds that
EIR No. 2G5 is in comp].iance with L-he CaliForni.a Enviror~mental Qua.lity Act anc]
the CiLy aild State C~QA Guideline~; ~hat econom:~c, sor.ial and physical
considera~ion^ r.:;.e it inf~easible to eliminai:e a11 of the siynificant
environmental impacts of L•he project which have been id~nta.fieu i.n EIR No.
165; that it will be nec~ssary to compl~te planning and provid~ for fundin~,~ ot
a system of arterial highways f~aving adequate capaci.ty to serve thiu proiect
and other future developments in i~l~e region prior to approval oF zo~ling th,e
pznpErty for develo~ment. Ho~~aever, i:he benefits of ttic project have be~an
balanced against the unavoidable environmental impacts and, pur.s~ianh to th~
~rovisions of Section 1.5093 of th~ State CEQ11 Guidelines, the uccurrence of
~he significant envixonmenta7. effects ider,ti~ied ir. ETR No. 265 and as set
forth ab~ve may be permi~t2d without further mitigatian due to the following
overriding considerations: 1? the project wi].1 provide a balancec9 resident:ial
community to fill a need for h,~iUSt!'1C~ an increasing population; 2) tt~e projecL-
is compatible with surrounding land uses; and 3) mitigai:ion measures h~ve b~en
incorporated inta ~,h~ project to rzduce the envir.onmental impact to an
acceptable ievel; ther~for.P, the Planning Commission recommend~ that the Cit;~
Council c~rtity EIR No. 265 for the annexation and
Ranch and adopt this St.atement of Ov~rriding Considerations~ pxan af Uak Hi17.s
BE TT FU~t'rH~R FLSOL~I~D that, pursuant to the foregving findings, t~e
Anaheim City Plan-~ing Commission does hereby adopl: and recommer,d to the City
Council of ~he City ~~f. Ar~ah~im acloption of General Plan Amendment No. .188 -
Land Use Element, Exhibit A, with emphasis on the permitted number 4f
developable dwelling units ranging from ze.r~ (0) to ?,400 ur-its, with th~
actual riumbe.r of implementab.le units to be aul-horized by the City at the time
of approval of Plannec~ Community t.PC) ~voning and subdivis~i.on appr~~vaZ~,
THE; P'OREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approv~d uy me this 30th day
of April, 1984~
~~''!~ ~ e/!
i. .
" n ~lG~ ~-~ ; ,'~'__,~,~,,
CEIAIRW0~9AN, A~CI:7.'Y .PLANNING CONriyISS:ION
i4'i"I'EST : , ~r v
1.~.
~~~.~ ~~ ~ ~i'LiC.c.Q.~
SECRETARY, ANAH~IM CITY PLANIvING COMMTSSION
` PC84-t35
ST~T~ OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF pRANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAEIEIM )
I, Edith L. Har.ris, Secrc;tary of the Anaheim Cit•y Planning
Commiss~ori, du hereby cc~rtify that the :Eortgoir.g res~luL••iun was passed and
adopted at a rneering of the Anak~eim CiL•,y Plan*Zing Commission held on Apri1 30,
198~~ k~Y the f~llawing vo~.e of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, rRY, K:ING, LA CLAIF~
NOES: COMMISSIQN~Ra: BUSHORE
ABSF.NT; CQMMISSTONERS~ HERI3u`.P, MC BURNLY
ItJ WITNI,SS WHEREOF, z have hereun p set my hand this 30th day of
APril, 1984. ~- n %~ ,
~~. ,~
~ ~`/ '~'~-1-~~..
SECRETARY, ANAT~IEIM CIT'.I PI~F1NNIr~G ~OMMISS70N
-3-
PC84-85
r,;
~ ,~~ ~,~.:,; ~., •.:~~ ~ ~ ,, . _
~.~ ,,,