Loading...
PC 84-9,,,~.,, 12LSULU`i'IOi~ NU. ~C8h-9 A K~;iOLU'.I'ION ON 'l'HL ~~Ne4FiEIM LZ'i'Y PLANNING COMMISSION '.PEiAT PET.I`L'IO~~ ~QR CONDIZ'.IUNAI, USE PERMIT N(~. 2523 BE DENIED "yL,P.1,AS, th~ Anaheim City Flanning Cnmmission did r.eceive a ver.ified PE~t:iri~r~ Lor. Conditicn~l. Use Per.;nil fr.oii~ ATLANTTC RICEIFTCLD COMPANY., 30~ West Glenoraks Boulevar.d, Glend~].e, CA 91202, AT'.CN; E. L. KGIL, owner. of. cer.tain real pr.operty sit~a;~ted in the City of AnahAim, County af Or.ange, State of Ca.liiornia, descr.ibed as: PARCEC~ 1, zN TEiL" CITY Or ANAHETM, AS SEIO~v'V vN A NAI~ xESk~REOI' RECORJ)Gll IN BQOK A5, FAGE 13, UF PARCGL MPPS, IiV THE ~Fi~ ICE OF 7'H~ CUUNTY kECORnER 0~ SAID COUN'TY. WHEREAS, the City ~'lanni.n~~ rommission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Centez in the City ~f Anaheirti on January 9, ].984 at 1:3Q p.m., notic:~; ui said public hear.ing haviny been duly giv~n as r.eguir.pd bx law and in accor.dance with the pr.ovisiar~s of. L-t~e 1lnaheim Munici~al Code, Ct~aptEr :18.03, to h~~ar. and consider. evid~nce £~r and against said pr.o~osed condit.ional use per-ni~ and to investigat:e and make findings and r_ecammcndations in connection ther.ewith; said public hear.iiig having been continued t.o the Planning c:ornmission meeticig of Janua.ry 23, 1984; a-td WHEREAS, saic~ Commis~ion, ~fter. due inspectinn, inve~tigation and ~tudy made by itself and in its behalf, and af-ter. due consicler.ation o~ alI evidence and r.epor.ts oEEer.~d ~1t said hear.iny, does find and d~termine the Eollowing facts: 1. Th~t ttie pxoposed uwe is prope::.ly one for, whict~ a conditional use per.mit is autho.r.ized by Anaheim M~nici~al Co~e Section 19.03.030.010 to wit: to permit a con~en.ience mar.ket w.ith gasoline sales and off-salc beer. and wine. 2. 2'hat the proposed use i: her.eby deniecl on the ba~is that the cet~~i.l sales would includc: off-sale beer. and w;ne in an e:tisting service station and ttiat driver.s' acceasibility to beer, and wine in con~unction with the sale of gasollne to Euel vehic.tes dr.iven on Ci~y atr.eets would cceate a danqer.ous situation with persons drinking and dr.iving. The us~ is £ur.ther deriied on tht ba~is that app~oval of trie propased dual use of the p~opecty could s~et an undesi.Kable precedPnt; ttiat the property is located 3.n an induatrial azea near. the Anaheim Stad_um and tt:e accessibility of beex and wine ~o fanr going ta the Stadium and consumming lhe alc~hol in the parking lot could lead ~o disturb:~nces betw~:en fans; anc~ that the acce~sibility Af beez and wine to e~nployees in the induslr.ial ar.ea could leac~ to industrial accidents. 3. ~hat t;~e pr.oposed ~ise including oEf-sale beex and wine wi.l: ~dve~sely affect th~ adjoinir~g lranci us~es and the qr.owL-h and cleve~opment of che area i.n whi.ch it is pr.oposed to be :ocar~Pd. 4. T'hat the size and shape ot the site pr.uposed £or. the ust is not ade,uate to al.low the kull ~~evelopment oC t:he pr.oposed c~ual use of a cnr,venience mar.ket with gasoline ~a;es an~ off-sale beez and wine in 3 manner. not ~3etr.imEntal to the par.ticular. ar~~a nc~r to the pea~e, t~ealth, saf~ety and genexal welfa~.e ot L•he Citizens of the City of Ana:-eim. #U135r PC84-9 5. ThaL• Lhe gr.anGing of ~he Canditional Use Per.mit under the conditiions irnposed, if any, will be detr.imenta.l Co the raeac.t, health, sa~ety and ,yen~r.al welfar.e oE the C~,kiznns af the City o~ Anaheim. G. 'rhal: tllE ;r.affic gener.ated by the ~r.oposed use ~aill impose an undue bur.r]en upon the str.eeEs an~ high~~~ys design~d and i.mpr.oved tc car.r.y th~ Lr.af.fie itt L-he ar.ea. 7. That na orie indicated ~h~i.r. pr.esence at sai.d ~ublic hear.ing in opposikion; and that no coKresgondenc~ was r.eceived in opposition to the subject petition. ENVIFtONMEN`i'AI~ IMPAC'r FINL'ING: 'i'hat th~ Anar~eim City Planning Commission has xeviewed the proposal to per.rnit « conven.ience mar.ket w,ith gasoline sales and ofC-sa.le bear. and wine on a r.ectan~ularly-shaped parcel of 1a[ld eonsisting oE appro~;zrnately 0.51 acr.e locatec~ at t11e ~outhwest• cocner nf K~tella Av~nuc and State College Bou.levar.d, and furL•her descx3.bed as 1801 S. State Colleye Boulevazd (Acco 5er.vic:e St~-~tiun); and does her.ehy appr.ove khe Negatxve DecJ.azati~n upon tin.ling thar it has ~onsidQr.ed the Negative Declar.atiun together with any comments r.ec~iv~d during the publlc review pzocess arid k~.~rther fxndir.g on the basis oL- Che init.ial study and any comments received thal• there is no substanLia]. evidencN that the pxoject wi.ll have a sigr;ificant ePfec•t on the ~nvironment. NOW, TEIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I:he A.~ahF~~m City P1ann.ing Commis.;ion does her.eb,y ~eny subjec~ Petitiar~ for.~ Canditiona: Use Pe~-mit, on the basis of ~he aFozementianec: findi.ngs. 7.'HE FOREGOI~IG RESOL~TION is signed an:i appr.oved by me thi3 23r.d day ~~ r .. of January, 1984. , > , , _ /i /CG...:( ~ ~ .. ~ C r=;-~ ;z/ c:H~AIRWOMAN~:- AHEIM CITY PLANN~I~G COb1MISSIUN AT'rEST: ~ , ..~ .~C_G~,c~J., , .,ILiZ~z.~<, SECRETA.RY, ANAHGTM CI`I'Y PLAN~I:ING (:OIdMISSION S~'ATE GF CALIFORNIA ) C•OUNT\' OF ORANGE ) s5. ~:ITY Ob' ANAH~tM ) I, Edith L. Elar.r.is, Sec~etar.y of the Anah~:im City Planning Commission, do hereby cer.tify that the for.ego.iny r.esolt~tion was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commistiion helc7 cn Jar.uar.y 23, 19i34, by the following vote of the memb~r~ ther.eof: AYES : CQNMI55IONGR.ri : E30UAS ~ BUSEiORE ~ FRY ~ E{F.Rf3S'P ~ K I NG ~ LA CLA.IRr ~ MC BURNk,Y NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NON~ ABSENT: COMt4ISSI0NERS; NONL•; IN WITNE~S WHEREqh, i have heceunto Fet my hand r_his 23rd day of J~anuary, J.984. ~ ~~ ` ~~ ~ -- ~.c:'Lc~~ /~~•L•Z~-~ SEC:2ETAP,Y, ANI~HEIM CITY PLANtl:fNG COMMISSI~[1 -2- PC84-9