PC 84-96~ ~,
.~*.
RESOLU~.CIQN NO. PC84-96
A 12ESOLUTION OI' THE ~NAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMIS;~TON
THAZ' P.G'i'ITION rOR VARIANCE NO. 3396 B~ GRAN'1'En, IN p~R~
WHEREAS, khe Anahezm City Plann:ing L'ammission did rec~ive a ver. iFi~d
Petition for. Variance from PURUSEIOTTAMUAS R. PATEL AND N]:LA P. PATEL, ;~p~,7
South Har.bor 33oulevar.d, Anaheim, Califor.nia 92802, owner.s, and JOHN F. SWINT,
707 Weai~ North Str.eet, .~nat~eim, Cali.f.or..nia 92805 & JGEJN L. SCHMITZ, 718 North
Ar~ahe~m Boulc~var.d, anaheim, Calif.ornia 92805, ayent ot cer.tain real prop~r.ty
situated in tt~e City of~ Alzaheim, County of ~r.ange, State of Califa.rnia
desc.ribec] as :
PARr;;L 3 Qr ~~HA'.I~ rERTAID] PAR~.EI, t~1AP RECORDED IN BOOK 17G,
PAGE ~7 GF PARCEL MAPS, RECC~12llS OF OKANG~ COUNTY, CALIFUFtNIA.
6VFIEREAS, the City P1ant~ing Commission ciid hold a
the Civi.c Center .in th~ City of Anaheir~~ on hlay 1~, 198~1, at p`~30tC heazing ~t
of said publxc hear.iny hav~,ng been c1u1 P•m•o not.i~e
accozdance wxth Lhe pr.ov5.sions of the Anahe m eMuni cipa 1uCode, b hapter 18.03n
to heaz• and consider. evidence Lor and aga.ins~ said pr_oposed var.iance and to
invesl-igate and make findings and r.ecommenc~ations in r_Q,~nection thexewith; and
WH~REAS, saia Commission, a~te~ du~ inspecti~n, investigation and
stuc7y made by itselF and in its behalf, and af ter. due cons:~c~exation of a11
evidence ar~d r.eppxt;; offer.ec~ at s~id hear.ing~ does Lind and deter.mine the
foliawing facts:
•1 • That t~e petitioner pznpo,;~s Waivey-s o.E t,~e fo1loF~ing to
conUtr.uct a f r.eestanding sign and an i.llum:nated r.~of sign:
(a) SE,C7.~I0~1 1~.05.093.022 -
Maximum ar.ea of. freestanding siqn
~'~0 Sauax~ feet per.mitt~d; 185 sguar.e
f_ee~ pr.oposed)
(b) SECTION 18.U5.093.0?.3 -
(c) SECTIqN 18.p5_093.032 -
(d) SEC7.'ION 18.i15.093.033 -
( e ) SEC;TION 16.05.093, , p341 _
#0222r.
Pexmitted location of Freestandin sictn
(8 feet t'rom s~ukh pr.operty li.r~e r.equ rx' ed;
5 feet pzoposed}
Maximum ar.ea of roof' sian
(40 squar_e feet per.mitted; 120_~quare f~et
proposed) '-
Per.mitted location of r.o~f sian
(109 f~ grom north p~oper.ty li.ne z•equired;
0 feet proposed)
Ma_xi~ mum heighh, of i1lum:inated r_oo~
(30 feet high per,mitked; 41 feet, 8 inches
propo,sed )
PC84-96
~415Yl~Y.i.l .l' r . . ... . .
,: u~~,.
i` ,
2. That the ab~ve-mentioned waiver.s (a) and (b) per.taining to
fr~estanding Ga.gns ar.e hereb1~ grantccl on the basis of the unusizally riarr.ow
Pr.ontage and the shape of subject proper.ty, and subjecl. to the ~ond.ition that no
si.gns of any ty~e ~ha.l1 be per.mitted on i:he wall or r.cof at the r.ear. of th~ mo4e1
facing Convention VJay or the Hilton a.nd Marriott Hotels (no.rth and wesi: si.des ofi
builcl:ing ) .
3. T?~at t.h~ r. e~uested ~aaiver.•s ( c~ ( d), anc~ ( e) ar. e hereby denied on
tne bas.is that th~~r.e are -zo s~aecial ca.r~umstances applicak>1e to thE proper.ty which
~o not apply to other. :icientically zoned proper.ties in ~he v:~ci.nity; and strict
appl:ication of t;ne Zoning Code oiou].d nat depr.i.ve ~h~ pr.ope~-~y of. pr.ivyl2ges
en;joyed by othex. pra~er.i:ies i.n ider~tical zoning classification in l:h~ vicinif:y.
4. Tha~. ther.e az-e exceptional or extr.aor.dinary circumstances or
condition s applicable to the pzoper.ty invol~~ed or. to the .~ntended use of the
proper.ty that do not apply gener.al~.v to the pr.oper.ty or cla;~s of. usE in the same
vicinity a nd zone.
5. Tr.at the zeque:~ted variance is necessazy for the preser.vation and
enjoymeiit of a substanta.al pr.oper.ty right possesse~ by other proper.ty is~ the same
vxcinity and zone, and deni~d to the pr.oper.ty :in question.
6. That the requested variance wi11 no~ be mater.~~l:ly d~crimental to
th~ pu.blic welfar.~ or injur.i.~us to the ,proper.ty or. impr~vements in such vici.nity
and zone a~n which thP pxoper.t,y is locak:ed.
7. That no one :indicat~d their. presen~a at said public hearing in
op1~osition; and that no correspondence was r.ecel.ved in a~aposition to subject
petit~.on.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDIN~; The P'lanning DirecL-ur or his authorized
repr.esentatave has dekc~rmined that the pr.o~osed pr.qject fa11s within t.he
defi.nition of Categor..ical Exemption~, ~,lass 11, a~ defined in the State EIR
Guic~elines and is, tner.e~or.e, categozically exernpt fr.om the r.equa.r.ement to prepare
an ~IR.
NOW, 'PHEREFORE, BE T`.P RESULVED that the Anahei~i Ca.ty Planniny Comm:ission
does hereby gr.ant subject Petitiail Poz Vaziance, upon the following condit.fons
which axe her.eby found to k~e a necessary pr.er.equisite to rhe pr~posed use aE ~he
subject pzopexty in order to pr.eserve the safety and general welfar.e of the
Citizens of ~he Ci.ty of Ana:leim:
1. That subject proper.ty shall be developed substantially in ~ccor.clance
~ith plans and specifications on file with the Ciky of Anahei.m marked
Exh.ibit Nos. 1 thxough 3; pr.o~~a.ded, however., that (a) ther.e sha11 not be
any r~of s.igns, (b) the propased ~reestanding sign shall be located a
minimum of eight (0) feet wester.ly of the east pr.oper.ty line ad;jacent to
Harboz f3oulevar.d; and (c? ther.e sha~.l be no sign:~ of any type permiLted
on the north and west ends of. th~ pr.oposed motel bui.lding fac:ing
Conventiun P7ay oz the Hi.].~on ar.d I9ar.r.iott Hotels.
2. That pzior to final bui.lding and zoni.ng lRS)JPCtlOlla~ Condition P7o. 1,
above-mentioned~ shall be camplzed with.
-2-
PC84-96
~; ~
s
iiL IT hUR't'HE2~ RESpLVLD th~at the Ana'rietm City Plann.tny Co~nrnissfon doe~
hereby £tnci and ~leter.m.tnc that 4~doption oC thts ~tesolu~,ton i.s expr.essly ~r.ed:tcated
upor. ~~~licant's r;ompl.iance with euch and ~i.L1 of the condittons her.efnabove set
Poxth. Shau:ld any such condttion, or. an,y par.t ther.~c;~, b,~ c]ecl~r.ed invnli
d ur
unen~:orceable by
the ~inal judgmt~7t of
any .
.
cour.t of comp~~ent jur.isdtction, then
this Resolution, and any aaproval5 her.ctn contatneci, sha11 be deem~~d nu11 ar~d votd.
THE k'ORGCUiNG f2E5ALU'PTON is signed ~nd ~ppr.oved by me thiN 14th day ~f
M~y, 1984.
.___-~~'L_._.t2`' ~ • ~~......:_..
CHATRWO , ANAfiFIM CTTY 1?LANNING COMMISSJ.ON
ATTE5'L' :
-----~~~c..~LGc.. ~( • ~ !,
_ ~Y~Q
SECRE'i'P.RY, ANAHEIM CITY YLANNIt~G COMMISSION
STATF OF CALIFOR[3IA )
(:OUNTY QF ORANGG ) s~.
C1TY Or' IINAHEIM )
I, Cd.~th L. Harr.is, Secr.etar.y of the Anahei,n City Planr~ing Commission,
do hereby cer.t.ify that the for.egoing r.esolut.ton wa~ nasse~ and adopted at a
meeting of r_he Anaheim City Planning C.ommiss.ian held on May 14, 1984, by tha
followtng vote c~f the ~~ember.s ther.ecf-
iIYES: COMMTSSIONERS; BOUAS, BUSHG::::, PR.', HrF.BS'C~ KING, MC BURriFX
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSCNT: CUMMISSIONEFtS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNES5 WHCREOF I have hcr.eunto set m~ hand this l~th day oE May 14,
1989.
~ ~t/
; _ .. /~~~ „ •
S~CRETARY, ANAHE.T.M CIT'f PLANNING COMMISSION
-3•
~
~i
~I
i
PC~i~I-96
i
;
C~
~.J