PC 85-116fiESOLUTION N0. PC85-116
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINv COMMTSSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIA~CE N0. 3479 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Ananeim City Planning Commission did [eceive a verified
Petition for Variar.c~ from ROGER L. WSLLIAMSON AND FAUL D. WILLIAMSON, 3450
East La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, California 92806, owners of certain real
property situated in L•he City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California described as:
YARCGL 1:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 3 OF ORANGE GROVE ACRES, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA~ AS SHOWN ON A
I4AP THEREOF RECOR~ED IN BOOK 6, PAGE 42, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE t70R'tHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3~ SAID POINT
BEING IN THE CENiER LINE Oi LA PALMA AVENUE (40.00 FEET
WIDE); THENCE SUUTH 3° 45' 29' EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE
OF SAID LOT 3 A DZSTANCE OF 764.48 FEET Tn A POINT THAT IS
NORTH 3° 45' 29" WEST 479.15 FEET FROM T[iE SOUTH[~TEST CORNER
OF SAID LOT 3 SAID POINT AL50 BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
THE LAND DESCRIIIEU IN DSED TO FREDERICK P. 6]ORLEY AND OTHERS~
RECORDED APRIL 28~ 1959~ IN ROOK 4687, PAGE 372, OFFICIAL
RGCORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF 2'HE COUNTY RECORDER OL' SAID COUNTY;
THENCE tJORTH 73° 49' 30" BAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LANU TO MORLEY~ 203.56 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY
LINE OF TfiE WESTERLY 2/3RDS OF SAID LOT 3~ SAID POINT BEING
THE NORTHEAST C012N~F OF S:~ID MORLEY LAND; TEIENCE NORTH 3° 45'
29" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 2/3RDS OF A
LOT 3 A DISTANCE OF 764.81 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID CENTER
LINE OF LA PAL61A AVENUE~ SAID CBNTER LINE BEING THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 73° 94' DO' WEST 203.56 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2:
THE; WEST OP]E-T:IIF2D 02' LOT 2 AND THE EAST ONE-THIRD OF LOT 3,
BOTFI OF ORANGE GROVE ACRES~ AS PER MAP P.ECORDED IN BOOK 6,
PAGE 42 OF FIISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY~
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 3:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 OF ORANGE GRO~E ACRES, AS P~R MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 6~ PAGE 42 OF MISCELLANEOOS F1APS~ RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY~ CdLIFORNIA~ LYING EASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY
OF T[iG FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
i
c
!
; 0514r PC85-116
~
f
~
.~__.. .__
.~c,dra~.-.^.+ . .:: . , . _ . ... .... _ : . .
; ,-~.
~
,
BEGIVNING AT A POTNT ON THE NORTHERLY LINC OF SAID LOT 4~
SOUTH 73° 44' DO" WEST 85.29 FEET FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY
CORNER OF SAZD LOT 4, SAID POIA7T BESNG ON THE CENTERLINE OF
LA PALMA AVENUE (40.00 FEET WIDE); THENCE SOUTH 03° 45' 29"
EAST 662.78 FEET~ PARALLEL WITH 2•,E EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT
4; THk~NCE SOUTHEASTERLY 117.77 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID
EASTERLY LINE NORTH 03° 45' 29° WEST 479.15 FEET FROM THE
SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 4~ SAID POINT BEING THE
NORT!iWEST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO
FREDERICK P. MORLEY AND OTHERS RECORDED APRIL 28, .1959 ZN
900K 4687~ PAGE 372 OP OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pu6lic hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 29, 1985, at 1:30 p,m „
~, notice o£ said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
1 accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim t4unicipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation and
,~ study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
t' evidence and reports offered at said hea:ing, does find and determine the
foilowing facts:
t• That the petitioner proposes w~iver of the following to expand
a self-storage facility:
SECTIONS 18.06.USU.031. - pfinimum_umber of parkinq spaces
18.06.080 AND (650 spaces required; 27 soaces exi,ting)
18.61.066.050
Z• That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby granted on the
basic t":at the parking waiver will not cause an increase in traffic congestion
in the immediate vicinity nor adversely affect any adjoining land uses and
granting oE the parking waiver ur.der the conditions imposed, if any, wi11 not
be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare oE the
citizens of the City of Anaheim, and on the basis that the nature of the use
requi.r.es 1FSS than Code reyuiced parkino for genera.l industrial uses.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions apolicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to t•he property in question.
5• That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property ur improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
oPposition; and that no cor.respondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
-Z-
PC85-116
,-.. .~~.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMF.~ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to expand a self-~torage facility with
waiver of minimum number of parking spaces on an irregularly-shaped parcel of
land consisting o£ appcoximately 9.54 acres having a frontage of approximately
492 feet on tne south side of La Palma Avenue, and further described as 3450
East La Palr,~a Avenue (Williamson Self-Storage); and does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative
Declatation together witt~ any comments received during the public review
process and further finding on tlie basis of the initial study and any comments
received that rh<`.CP. is no substantial evidenc,~ tnat the project will have a
significant effect on tne environment.
NOW, ~•HEREFORE, BE ZT RGSOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning
Canmission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
conditions which are heceby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the Cit-y of Anaheim:
1. That prior to issuance of a buildiny permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim i:, an
amount as determined by the City Council for new industrial
buildings.
2. That sidewalks shall be installed along La Palma Avenue as required
by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and
speciPications on file in the Office of L-he City Engineer. This
condition shall over-ride lhe existing temporary sidewalk waiver.
3. That there shall be no outdoor storage, whatsoever.
4. That gates shall not be installed across any driveway in a manner
whict~ may adversely affect vehicular traffa.c in the adjacent public
stceets. Installation of any gates within a distance of sixty (60)
L-eet from said public street right-of-way shall be subject to the
review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of- in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants
shall be installed and charged as required and detecmined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
7. That all lockable pedestrian ard vehicular access gates shall be
equipped with a"knox box" device to the saeisfaction of the Chief
of Police and the City Fire Marshall.
t3. That fire sprink.l2rs shall be installed as required by the City Fire
Marshali.
9. That trash storage a~eas shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with approved plans on file with the Street Dlaintenance
and 5anitation Division.
-3- PCSS-116
•`.;
,,:...,^~e - °- - _ -
~
~
10. That the proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of the
ML Zone, unless a variance allowing sign waivers is approved by the
Planning Commissi.on or City Council.
11. That subject property sha11 be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1.
12• That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of
one year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first,
Condition No. 1, above-r~entioned, sha11 be complied with.
Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be
granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
13. That pri.or to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
Z, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 11, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
;, does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
.; predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
~ hereinabove set forth. Should an such condition
declared invalid or unenforceable b ~ or any part thereof, be
competent jurisdiction, then this Y the final judgment of any court of
contained, shall be deemed null and void solution, and any approvals herein
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and a
of April, 1985. Pproved by me this 29th day
~i ~ ~
`.~v_ ~ ~
ATTEST: ~ -~rI MApI, ANAHE 1 C~ pL~MMIS
~ SION
_ ~~- ~° ~1-~.~-~..~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY FLAND7ING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
C~iUNi'Y uE' URANGE ) ss.
CITY p~ AN~HEIb1 )
I. Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City planning Commis~ion held on April 29,
1985, by the following vote of the membecs thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOSHORE~ FRY, AERHST~ RING, LA CLAZRE
NOES: COMDIISSIONERS: NONgURNEY
AisSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have her=unto set my hand this 29th day op
April, 1985.
~; _ ~~.~.~ ~° .
~~--- A=
SECRCTARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOI3
G -4-
~ FC85-116