PC 85-119RESOLUTION N0. PC85-119
A RESOLUTZON OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFZCATION N0. 84-85-33 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commissiun did receive a verified
pe~ition for ReclassiEication from SYNOD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AtdD HAWAli,
15U1 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, Cali.fornia 40017, owner, and VICTOR
CUNSTRUCTION COMPANY, 3445 East La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, California 92806,
owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Oranye, State of California, described as foltows:
ALL THAT CERTAIN ;AND SITUATED IN 'PHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
CUUNTY OF ORANCE, CITY OF ANAHEIM~ LYING WZTHIN A PORTION OF
PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN 'LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT
88' RECORDED 24 SEPTEMBER 1981 IN BOOK 14231~ PAGE 1429~ OF
OFFICIP.L RECORUS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING Am THE PfOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1 AS
SHOWN ON SAID 'LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT'; THENCE NORTH 32° 52' 42•
WEST 103.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62` 29' 42' WEST 136.00 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT Ofi BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 62° 29' 42" WEST
243.45 FEET; TH~NCE NORT6 42° 39' 42° WEST 165.4Q FEET TO A
POINT IN A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWE3TERLY~ HAVING A RADIUS OF
2110.00 FEET; A RADIAL LINE BEAP.ING NORTfi 39° 30' 44' WEST
PASSES TH120UGH SAID POINT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
CUkVE THROUGH A CGNTRAL ANGLE OF 04° 39' 51" AN ARC DISTANCE
OF 165.70 FEET TO A POINT GF REVERSE CURVATURE~ SAID REVERSE
CURVE BEZNG COPlCAVE SOUTHEAS':ERLY, HAVING A RAUIOS OF 25.00
FEET; A RADIAL LINE BEARING NORTH 35° 00' 22" WEST PASSES
THROUGH SAID POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY
ALONC SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEC7TRAL ANGLE OF 92° 06' 34" AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 40.19 F'EET TO A TA:7GENT LINE; THENCE ALONG
SAID TANI;ENT LINE SOUTH 36° 06' S6' EASi 378.29 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 53° 28' 38" EAST 46.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37° 06' 56'
WEST 58.00 E'EET; THENCE NORTH 53° 28' 38" EAST 92.00 FEET;
Tii':;t:CL• NGiti't, a5` Ub` U4" EAS'i' 19.i.'~f1 PEBT TO THE TROE POIt~T
OF BF.GINNING.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Centec in the City of Anaheim on April 15, 1985 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence Eor and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said ~uhlic hearing having been continued to the Planning
Commission meetiny of May 13, 1985; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
k0518r
PC85-119
i
e
;~
,-• ~-
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassificati.on of subject
property fcom the RS-A-43,OG0(SC) (P.e~idential/Agricultu[al, Scenic
Cotcidot Overlay) Zone to the CL(SC) (Comi~ercial, Limited, Scenic
Corr.idor Uverlay)•
2. That the Anaheim Genera.l Plan designates subject property
for qeneral commeccial land uses.
3. That the pcoposed reclassification of. subject property is
necessary and/oc desirable for the orderly and prapez development of the
cort~munity.
4. That the propo~ed reclassification of ~ubject property
does pcopecly celate to l:t~e zones and their permitted uses locally
established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and
their permitted uses genecally established throughout the community.
5. Ttiat the proposed reclassification of subject ptoperty
zequires the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the
Ci~culatien Element of the Ceneral Plan, due to the anticipated inc~ease
in traffic which will be genecated by the intensification of land use.
t~. That no one indicated their presence at said public
hea[ing in opposition; and that no correspor.dence was ceceived in
opposition to subject pet:tion.
ENVIRONNENTAL IM?ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Conmiission has teviewed the proPotal to reclassify subject propecty from
the RS-A-43,000(SC) (Residentiai/Agciculrural, Scenic Corridor OveYlay)
zone to the CL(SC) (Commercial, Limited, scenic Co~ridor Overlay) Zone to
permit a retail centec with on-sale alcoholic beverages in an enclosed
restaucant, and with waivers of maximum number of signs, maximum number
of siyn display surface, required sign placement, maxi~~ium sign area and
minimum buildin9 setback, and with removal oE six (6; specinien l•rees on
an ircegulacly-shaped parcel ot Land consisting of approximately 2.4
acres located at the so~itheast co~nec of Santa Ana Canyon Road and
Fairtnont Boulevatd; and does heteby approve the Negative Declacation upon
GicldiR'y t`:;t it ~.~° ~~nsidnrPd the Neqative Declatation to9ether with any
comtnents eeceived durin9 the public review pcocess and further findiny on
the basis cf the initial study and any commer~ts received that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on
the environment.
N~W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission =s hereby 9rant subject Petition for Reclassification and,
by so doing, that Title 18-2oning of the Anaheim Fiunicipal Code be
amended to exclude the above-described property f[om the RS-A-43,000(SC)
(Residential/Agricultural, Scenic Corridor Overlay) 2one and to
incorporate said desc~ibed propecty into the CL(SC) (Commercial, Limited,
Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zone ~pon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite tod a egenz~alS welfare of
subject property in order to preserve the saEety
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
_2_ PC85-119
:i
: G:.~: ~.... - _ __._ _ . , _
trrr.._ . . .. . ~
1. That the owner(s) of subjecl property shall dedicate and improve a
10 foot wide equestrian and hiking trail easement along Santa Ana
Canyon Road and Fairmont Boulevard as shown on the Equestrian and
Hi~ing Trails Component of the Ceneral Plan and that improvement
plans, in acr.ordance with standard plans and specifications or. file
in the Office of the Cicy Engineer, shall be submitted in
conjunction with the grading plan; and, that prior to introduction
of an ordinance rezoning subject property, a bond in an amount and
forrn satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shal.l be gosted with the
City to guarantee the insrallation of the above-menti.oned
r?quirements prioc to occupancy.
2. That the oWner(s) of subject property shall landscape and irrigate
tne parkway of Santa Ana Canycn Road adjacent to subject pcoperty to
tt,e satisfaction of the Parkway Maintenance Division. The owner(s)
saall record a covenant agreeing to maintain said landscaping.
Sec•urity in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of
credit, or cash in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anat~eim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory
completiun of said improvement.s. Said covenant shall be recorded
and :;ecurity stiall be posted with the City prior to the introduction
of an ocdinance rezoning subject pr~perty to guarantee the
installation of the above-required impro~c•ments prioc to uccupancy.
3. That the vehicuLar access rights to Santa Ana Canyon Road and
Fairmont Boulevard, except at approved access points, shall be
dedicated to the City of AnahAim,
4. That all engine~:ing ceyuire:nents of the City of Anaheim along Santa
nna Canyon etoad, including preparation of improvement plans and
installation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters,
sidewalks, water Facilities, street grading and paveme~,t, ~ewer a~.i
drair.?~e facilities, or other appuctenant wock shall be complied
wi•_n as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
specifications on file in the ULfice of the City Engineer; and th~:
security in the form nf :+ h~n~, ~r,~_~_~~~~ ~[ ~~r~siC, Ietker oY
credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anahezm, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory
completion of said improvenents. Said security ~hall be posted with
the City prior to introduction of an ordinance r?zoning subject
property to guarantee the installation of the above-required
improveme~.Ls prior to occupancy,
5. That the uwner of subject property shall submit a lette.r requesting
termination of Reclassification No. 81-82-4 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 2249 to the Plann:ng Lepartment.
6. That street Lighting facilitie~ along Santa Ana Canyon Road a!:d
Faicmont Boulevard shall be installed as required by the Utili:ies
General Managec in accordar,ce with specifications on file in the
Office of Utilities Ceneral Manager, and that securii:y in the focm
of a bond, certificate of deposit, lecter of credik, or cash, in an
amount and Eocro satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted
with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the above-
-3 PC85-119
,~.
mentioned improvements. Said security shall be posted with the City
of Anaheim prior to the introduction of an ordinarce rezoning
subject p-nperty. The above-required improvements shall be
installe4 prior to occupancy.
7. That vehicular access to the er,.isting storm drain easement located
near the north and east property lines sha11 be dedicated to the
City of Anaheim, as required by the City Engineer.
8. That access easements for fi~e and Lrash vehicles shall be dedicated
to the City of Anaheim, as required by the Citv gire Marshall and
the Street Maintenance and Sanitation Director.
9. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subjeck
property, Condition Nos. 1 through 8, abc~ve-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights granted by this tesolution
shall become null and void by action of the Planning Commission
unless said conditioi~s are complied with within one year from the
~ate of this resolution, or such furthec time as the Planning
Commission may grant.
B6 IT FORTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
dues hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and a.ll of the condition.s
heceinabove se~t Porrn. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the fir..a~ judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed nuil and void.
THE EOREGOING RESOLOTZON ~signed and approved by me this 13t;~ day
of P1ay, 1985. ~
~= ;/ j
' ;;i/,<-G~ ~:~~ ~i.1--
/ c ~_
~--CHAIRDIAN, AtdAHEIM ITY PLANNING COMMISSIGN
ATTEST: ~.
~~~.~ ~° ~~~.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIL~I CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OE' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTV O.F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Corimission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meel-ing uf the Anaheim City Planning Commicsion held on May 13,
1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMPIISSIONERS: BOUAS, FRY~ HER65T~ KING~ LA CLAIRE ~ 61C BUkNEY
~ NUES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
A13SENT: COPIMIuSiUNERS: BUSHORE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF', I Have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of
May, 1985.
~~(,~, ~ ~~,~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM C?TY PLANNING COMMISSION
;;~~ '4' PC85-i19
~t,,
~r.i~~u~..ron.~*wmw.+.:.naw.,,~......w,...,,~ _~.,,....,_......_~,. ..... . ......... . .. . .,