PC 85-127,-.
RESOLUTION N0. PC85-127
A RESOLUTION OF THL•' ANAHEIM CITY PLANNZNG COMPIISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSZFICATION N0. 84-85-17 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheiai City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from WILLIAPI RICHARD DAMATTRE, ET AL., 24651
Seth Circle, Dana Yoint, CA 92629, owner of certain ~eal property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follows:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THG NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24~ TOWNSHIP 4
SOUTH~ RANGE 11 WES:, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, CITY OF
ANAH2,I[•1~ COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOUK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCCLLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1., TRACT N0. 3015,
RECORDED IN BOOK 90, PF.GES 26 AND 27 OF MISCELLANEOUS t1APS~
SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF FERN STREET 40
FEET WI~E AS SHOWN ON SASD TRACT MAP: THENCE NORTH 0° 11' il"
EAS'r 141.35 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE BEGINNING OF A
CURVE, CONCAVE TU Tt1E SOUTHWEST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 13
FEET; THE[4CE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY 20.47 FEET ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CtNTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 11' 56"; THENCE SOUTH
fiy° 59' 15" WEST 4fi.25 PEET; TliENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 11" WEST
155.U0 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE OF FE°N STREET TO
THE NnRTH LINB OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 69° 59' 15" EAST
61.33 FRET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
WIiEREAS, L-he City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Centec in the City of Anaheim on May 13, 1965 at 1:30 p.m., notice
oE s;:id public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim hlunicipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence f.or and against said pro~osed reclassification
und tc im~ectigake and n~}:e Pir.din~~ and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and repocts offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
followiny facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclaseiEir,ation of subject
ptopert.y Prom the RS-A-43,000 (Residential,Agricultural) Zor,e to the RM-1200
(Residential, hiultiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
low-medium density residential land uses and designates nearby properties to
the northeast across Bal.l Road and to the east across Fern Avenue for
medium-density residential land uses.
~G526r PC85-127
';;t
r
-
~1 , u
... .. _ . _ . . .. . . _. ~
wv .-.,. _ . . , . ._. . _. . . . . . . ,
: ~--. ~,,..
3. That the proposed reclassification of subjece propert,y is
necessary and/or desirable fur the orderly and proper development of the
community.
4. That the pcoposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses local.ly established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established throughout the community.
5• That the proposed reclassification of subject property reyuires
the dedication of. abutting streets in acco:dance with the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anl-icipated increase in traffic wl;ich will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That tt~ree persons indicated their presence at said public
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to subject petition.
ENVIRONhILNTAL IMPACT FiNDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commissica has reviewed the proposal to recla~~ify subject property from the
kS-A-43,000 (Residential,AgriculLUra1) 'Lone to the Rh1-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Famiiy) or a less intense zone to retain
single-f.amily residence with waivers of minimum number and teCen of detached
spaces, minimum building site acea, minimum floor area, minimum sideyard
setback, and minimum rear yard setback on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of
land consisting ~t approximately 9,332 square feeC located at the southwest
corner of. Ball Road and Fern Avenue and further described as 2902 West Ball
Road; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that it
has considered the Negative Declaration togethec with any comments received
during the publ.ic review process and further finding on the basis of the
iniL-ia? study and any comments receiveo that there i.s no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THERE:FORE, BE JT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereh~! grant subject Petition for Reciassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-ZOning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-descrihed groperty from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential,Agricultural) 2one and to incorporate sa:d described pcoperty
into t1~e RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone upon
the tollowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of subject prope:ty in order !o preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner of subject property shall irrevocably offer to
dedicate to the City of Ar,aheim a stri_r, of land 53 feet in width from
the centerline of the street along Ball Road for street widening
purposes.
2. That the vehicular access rights to Ball Road except at approved
access points, shall be dedicated to t!:a rity of Anaheim.
3. That prior to the introduction ~~f an ordinance reioning subject
property, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, abo•~e-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisir,ns or rights granted by this resolution shall
beaome null an~ void by action of the Planning Commission unless said
conditions are complied with within one year fron the date of this
resolution, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
-Z PC85-127
... . _. ... . ... . ___. . . ... . . . . .., ~ . .
. . . . . . . . .. _ . . . .. . . . ..... : .. ... . . ..~ ... :~, ~.. •~p~
q
~,.
BE ZT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and dNtermine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, oc any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the finsl judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then thi~ Resoluti~:~, and any approvals herein
„ contained, shall be deemed null ~nd void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is ,igned and approved by me this 13th day
of May, 1985. -/ -"
~_~' :.-G' : f' ' %
~CHAiR 1AN~ ANAHEb ITY PLANNING COF1ttISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~_ ~ .° ~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEI6I C7TY PLAt.NING COMPIISSIOtJ
:f STAT~ OF CALZFORNIP. )
~ COUP+TY OF URANGE ) ss.
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
: Commission, do hereby cettify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
' adopL-ed at a meal•ing of lhe Anaheim City Planiiiny Commission held on Flay 13,
1985, by the follawing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: ROUAS, BUSHOP.£, FRY, HERBST, KING, MC FsURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONEkS: NONE
ABSENT: COM[9IS.°,IOIJERS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS Wi{EREOF, I Have heeeunto set my hand this 13th day of
b:ay, 1585. ~I
" ~ .A r r~ ~ ~~,_,,~., . ~~
SECFtETARY, ANAfIGIM CIi'Y PLnNNING COMMISSION
-3- PC85-127
:~
`;i
:,~
~