PC 85-197RESOLUTION N0. PC85-197
A R~SOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT FETITiON FUR CONDTTIONAL USE PERbtiT NO. 2712 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from HUNG ENG SITY & SAZ SHU[aG SITY, 913
South Beach Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92804, owners, and LU ARCHiTECTS &
ASSOCIATES, 5362 Garden Grove Doulevard, $101, Garden Grove, California 92644
agent for certain real pcoperty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, described as:
PARCEL 1: THE NORTH 75.00 FEET GF THE SOUTH 937.00 FEET OF THE
EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND mHE NORTH 75.00 FEET OF THE SOUTN 437.00
FEET OF THE EAST 8.00 Cb~m OF THE {JESr HAI.F OF THE EAST NALF OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUT~EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,
TOWNSHiP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 11 WEST, IN THB RANCHO LOS COYO~ES,
CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS PER MAP RECORDED iN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF
FIISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OI'FICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
EXCEpT THE EAST 40.00 FEET THEREOF.
wHEIt~AS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the c:ivic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 19, 1985, at 1:30 p,m,,
notice oE said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions oE the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence For and against said pzoposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make Lindings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due considerar »n pp ~Zi
evidence a~r ~~.,~r~~ ~f.~t~d dL saio hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1• 2hat the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.45.050.160 to
wit: to construct a 7-unit addition to an existing 22-unik motel.
z• That the pcoposed use is granted subject to the condition that
a minimum 5-foot high fence shall be constructed along the entire length of
the northerly property line (except the front setback) and that said fence may
consisk of wrought iron, chain link or block, oc some combination thereof.
3• That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is pr~posed
to be located.
h• That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
aciequate to allow the full development of the groposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, saEety and
9eneral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
0600r
PC85-197
5. That the gc~nting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, wili not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the tzaffic gene~ated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden upon ~_he streets and highways designed and improved to carcy
the traffic in the area.
7. That two persons indicated their p~esence at said public
heariny in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to the subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal. to construct a 7-unit addition to an
existing 22-unit motel on a rectangulazly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
aoproximately 0.51 acre, having a fcor.tage of approximately 75 feet on the
west side of Beach eoulevard and being located approximately 360 feet north of
the centerline of Ball Road and further desccibed as 913 South Beach Aoulevard
(Robinhood Motel); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon
finding that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any
comments ceceived ducir.y the public review pcocess and further finding on the
basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no
substantial evidence t:iat the Qroject will have a significant effect on the
environment.
NOW, Ti~EP.EFURE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does he[eby g[ant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the followi~ig cenditions whicli are heceby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welf.are of the Citizens of the City of Anahei.m:
1. That ptior to issuance of a building permiC, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for new commercial
buildings.
2. That the e~isting 6-foot high block Wall adjacent to the west
property line shall be pecmanently maintained by the owne[ of
subject property.
3. That all ait conditioning facilities and other roof and ground
mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view, and the
sound buffered from adjacent cesidential properties.
4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with pians and specificatiuns on file with the City of Anaheim
msrked Exhibit Nos. 1 thtough 3; provided, however, tl~at a minimum
five (5)-foot high fence shall be constructed along the northerly
property ].ine (except foc the f~ont setback) and that said fence may
consist of wrought iron, chain link or concrete block, or some
combination theceof.
5. That prior to final buildiny and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
2, 3 and 4, abovA-me~tioned, shall be complied with.
_Z_ PC85-197
__,..
BE IT FURTH6R RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoptiun of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part tt~eceof, be
declaced invalid or unenforceable by tt~e final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any apptovals herein
contained, ~hall be deemea null ard void.
THE FUkEGOING RESGLUTION is signed and approved by me this 19th day
of August, 1985.
( ~~/.~Q%1/~O . ~~ /~`~~ i i
CHALRWOMAN~ ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSiON
ATTEST:
l /,'~ ,~/ '?I C~~L4:~
SECRETARY, ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSiOCi
STATE OF CALIFORNiA )
COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Flarris, Secretary o: the Anaheim City Planning
Conmission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meetiny of r_he Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August
19, 1985, by the following vote of the tnenibers thereof:
AYES: COPIMISSiUtJEkS: BOUAS, FRY, HL•'RBST~ LA CLAIRE, LAWLCKI, MESSE
NOES: COMFIISSION~RS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSZONERS: b1C BURNEY
iN WITNESS WHEREO~, i have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of
August, 1985,
`'i 'll E~C~ ~G • /Y~~~2'
SECRETARY, AhAHEiM CiTY PLANNING COMMISSi0D1
-3- PC85-197
~?'