PC 85-205RESULUTION tv0. PC85-205
A RLSOLUTIOP7 OF THE ANi~HEIM CiTY PLAt]tJINC COMPIISSION
THAT PF,iITIOtJ FUR COt~DITIONAL USE YERMI'P NO. 2697 BE GRI:f7:ED
WHEkEAS, the Anaheim City Planni~g Commission did receive a vetifzed
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from APF CENTER, ATTN: JACK HOROWI`:'Z,
P. O. Box 27163, Las Angeles, Califocnia 90027, owner ot certain [eal prop~tty
sitiiated in the City of Anaheim, County oE Oranye, ;tate oE California,
descr:bed as;
THE LAC7D P.EFERRL•'D LO IN THIS REPORi IS SIiUATEB IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORPi:fA, COUN.Y OP ORANGE, CIPY OF ANAHEIM~ AND ZS DESCRIBED
AS FOLL~WS:
ThAT YORTIUPI OF THE FRACTIONAL NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1,
TUWNSHIP 4 SUUTFi, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJUN DE
SAtJi:T~ ANA, AS SNOWN ON A MAP iHEREOF RECORDED IN BGOK 51~ PAGE
10 OF MISCELLA[dE0U5 h1AP5~ RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY~ SHOWN
AS PARCEL 3 ON A MAF RECORDED IN BOOK 57, PAGE 28 OF PAFCEL
MAPS~ RECURDS OF SAIU Oi.ANGE COUNTY. ~
Wk1EREAS, the City Planning Commis~ion did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on June 10, 1985, at I:30 p.m., notice
of said public heariny having been duly given as required by law and in
accocdance with the provisions of tFie Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and ccnsidec evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
pec;nit and to investigate and make findings and reconimendations in connection
therewith; said public h?a~in~ having been continued Co the Planning
Commission meeting of September 16, 1985; and
WNEREAS, said Commission, aftez ~iue inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, end after due considecation of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1• ^.hat the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authocized by Anaheim btunicipal Code Section 18.61.050.070 to wit:
to retain three automobile reoair and :~nr~mnr~v~ ~~~~~r•@ ~~-2-eccc~ in the I3L
(Industrial, Limited) Zone in Uni:s identified a~ G, 0, P& R of subject
complex.
2. ihat the proposed uses for welding/parts insEallation, window
tinting and cam grinding shall be permitted in the Units identified as G, O, P
and R only, and any other automotive related uses in this complex shall be
consi6ered individually by the Planning Commissior. under separate conditional
use pe[tnit applications.
3. That the proposed use will not adversel,y affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be lor_ated.
4. That the size and shape of the site prop~sed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detsimen^al to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general M•elfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
0611r
PC85-205
;.rs;•;r..~-....,:-..:~..,....~.,._.~_____... ._......_ ..,.. _.....
5. That the granting of the ~onditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not ha detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of l•he Citi~ens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic gene~ated by the proposed use will not impose an
undue Gurden upon the streets ar,d higt~ways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
F.NVIROtJMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the A7aheim City Planning
Commiusion has reviewed the proposal to retain three automobile repair and
automotive related businesses in tne P1L (Industrial, T:imited) Zone on an
icregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 4.1 acr.es
located at the southwest corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Placentia Avenue
and further described as 1631 North Placentia Avenue, Units G, 0, P and R; and
does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that it has
ccnsidered the Negative Declaration to9ether with any comments received during
the public review process and furthec finding on the basis of the initial
study and any comment.s received that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for ConditionaJ. Use Permit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessaty prerequisite
to tlie propo:~ed use of the subject prope:ty in otder to preserve the safety
and general welfare of tha Citizens ot the City of Anaheim:
1. That due to the change in use and/or occupancy of the building, plans
shall be submiCL•ed to the Buildinq Division showing compliance with
the minimum standards of the Cit~~ of Anaheim, including the pniform
euilding, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical and Fire Codes a~ adopted
by the City of Ar.aheim. Th~~ appropriate permits shall be obtained
for a~,y necessary work in each uni.t identified as G, 0, P and R.
2. That ,. Lr~ffi~ signal ~ssesswenc Lee (basPd on the square footage of
the individual Unit~ G, 0, P and R) equz•ling the difference between
the in~iustrial and commercial assessmenc fees shall be paid to the
City ot Anaheim in an am~unt as determined by the City Council.
3. That each Unil- identified as G, 0, P and R shall comply with all
signing requirements of the 61L Zone, unless a variance allowing sign
waivers is approved by the Planning Commissioz n~ City Council.
4. That no outdoor stocage of or work c~, vehicles or v.~hicular parts
shal]. be permitted in conjunctio~ with any of the subject businesses,
identified as Units G, O, P ai~d R.
5. ihat subject pr~prrty shall be developed substantially in accordance
H•itt, plans and specifzcatio:~s on file with the Ciryo uf Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and '2.
-2- PCB:,-205 I
~. ~
6. That Conditicn Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed by
subject businesses, identified as Units G, O, P and R within a period
of ninety (90) days from the date of this resolution.
7. That prior to final building and zoning inspections for subject
businesses, identified as Units G, 0, P and R, Condition Nos. 3, 4
and 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressSy
pL~edicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declaced invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent juxisdi.ction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 16th day
of September 16, 1985. ~
~ ~
~7 CGf~! z.~ , ~ /'.~ /1,! i. o ,
CHAIRWOMAN~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTE5T:
(XX~ o _ .
SECREmARY~ ANAHGlA1 CITY PL NNING COMMISSION
STAT.E UF' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEI61 )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commiss~on, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September
16, 1985, by the following vote of the members theceof:
AYES: CONIMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ FRY, HERBST, LA CLAIRE~ LAWICKI~ MC BURNE`!.
Ir'Oc:S: C02•1:~iIS.°iIUi:SRS: f:Oi:E
ABSENT: ~OM~7ISSIONERS: PIL•'SSE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha~~e hereunto set my hand this 16Lh day of
Sepl-eriber, 1985. ~~~ ~ 1~~~~
SECRETA~I2Y~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION
-3- PC85-205