PC 85-214RESOLUTION tJO, pCf35-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TEIAT YETITZON FOR RECLASSIFZCATION N0. 85-66-1 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from PACESEiTER EIOM~:S, INC., 4540 Camp„~ Drive,
Newport Beach, California 92660, ATTN: MICHAEL T. RAPHAEL, owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
Cali:ornia, described as follows:
LOi 2 OF TRACT N0. 11426, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ AS SHOWN ON A
MAP THERE;OF RECORD_D IN BOOK 511~ PF~GES 32 TO 34 INCLUSIVE~
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFPICE OF iHE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
WHERE;AS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 30, 1985 at 1:30 p,m, ~
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of tne Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and aga?nst said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said }±earing, does Eind and determine the
following facts:
1• That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
pcopecty from the RM-3000 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to the RM-1200
(Itesidential, Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
Z• That the Anaheim General Plan ri~rr~r.t11 c:ecigr,ates subjeet
I~_opettl ~cr iow-wedium density residential land uses. General Plan Amendment
No. 203 is pending to redesignates subject property to medium densitv
residential land uses.
3• That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessarv
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of tl~e community.
4• That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established iu
c2ose proximity to subject property ar,d to the zones and their permitted uses
yenerally established throughout the community.
5• That the proposed reclassification of subject properl•y requires
the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
9enerated by the intensification of land use.
6• That one person indicated his presence at said public heari~g in
opposition and one interested person indicated hi~ presence at said public
hearing; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
0619r
PC85-214
~-.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 248
whicti was certified by the City Council on tlarch 16, 1982, in connection with
Reclassification f~o. 81-82-17, Conditional Use Permit No. 2312 and Tentative
Tract No. 11426 (to permit a 2-lot 97-unit condominium subdivision on the
focmec Frernont Junior fligh School ~ite); and, therefore, does recommend to the
City Council that they approve the addendum to EIR No. .^.48 on the basis that
it is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and with
City Guidelines.
NOW, iHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby gcant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-ZOning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described property from the Rt4-300C (Residential,
Multiple-Pamily; Zone and to incorporate said desccibed property into the
1tM-12U0 (Residential, Multiple-Family) 2one upon the follewing conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of
subject propecty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject propecty shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 1C feet in width from the centerline of the
alley along the easterly 252 feet of the alley along the south
property line of subject property for alley widening purposes.
Z. That ~rior to the introduction of an o~dinance cezuning subject
property, Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resoluticn shall become null
and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said conditions
are complied with w~ithin one year from the date of this resolution,
or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEU that the Anaheim City Planning Commissiort
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Rer,oluticn is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and a:l of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Shniild any such conditirn, p: uZ~ py:t tFe~ecf, be
declared invali.d or unenforceable by the final judgment of any rourt of
competent jurisdiction, then this Re~olution, and any approvals herein
conkained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOt7 is signed and app[oved by me tnis 30th day
uf September, .1985.
---.
~y - `!i
C ~a~.~.•:~.• .:,' .~ ~%~~J
CHAIRWOMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNZNC COMPiISSION
ATTEST:
~ '
C /1/(,(v
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANtING CODIMISSION
'2- PC85-214
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i, Edith L. Harris, Seccetary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the forf;going resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planaing Commission held on September
30, 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COPIFiISSIONERS: BOUAS, LA CLAIRE, LAWICKI, MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: FRY, HERBST
ABSENT: COPIMISSIONERS: YONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF', I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day of
Septembez, 1985.
(Q~ .~
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~-~i~~~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-'~ PC85-214