PC 85-24RESOLUTION
N0. PCa5-24
A RESOLUT'IGN OF THF, Af:AHEIFI CITY
TFIAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIpN N~L~NNING
COMFfISSION
WH~REAS 84-85-19 BE GRANTED
petition foc ~ th~' ~naheim city pl~nnin
11oor Reclassification from `~ ~Ommission did
~' Sa~ Francisco ia 941p2ERT E. GONZALCS, 100eCVane a°erified
~ast Flower Street ' ~aliforn'
situated i~ .~ ' nnaheim, California g2805ner, and JEROME r7ess (19th
-° City of . agent g~r R• DRUKIN, 1280
described as follows: Anaheim, County op certain real
orange, State P1Operty
oE Ca]ifornia,
LOT TWEilTY-NINE (29) AND THE SOUTH 16 F
IN BLOCK "D' QF "THE :,ORELEI E~r OF
RECORDED IN Tg~~T.~ LOT THIRTY (30)
BUOY. ?9, PAGE AS SHOWN ON A MAP
LOS ANGELES COUNTY c4 ~F MISCELLANEOU
. CALIFORNIA. S R~CJRDS OF
• the Civi~ Wf~EREAS, the
Center City planning Commission
notice of lr~ the Cily of Anaheim did hold a
sa.id public hearin °~ January 21 Public hearing at
accordance with the 9 having been dul ~ 1985 at 1:30
to hear Provisions of the Y 91Ven as required b p~m''
anQ consider evidence Anaheim Munici Y laW and in
: end to investigate and for and P~1 Code. Chapter lg,
~herewith; and make a9ainst said proposed reclassification
s findings and reco
mrtiendations in connection
~~HEREAS, said Comriissi~n,
study made by itself and after
eol dUWZn and reports offec -~9 lat saidjf ~ a~ eafte ~Q~~e~con ideration 2Qn
4 and
9 facts: hearing, does f?nd ~f all
and determine the
1• That the petitioner
Prupecty from the RM-2400 (Residentialpr~P~~'es
(Re:;idential reclassificatiori of
, Multiple-Family) Zn~~ ~ Muitiple-p~~ily) Zone subject
to construct a 6-unit a to the RM-1Z00
Z• The Anaheim General p Partment complex.
densit,y resioential land la~ desi
uses. 9nates subject property fot medium
Apr!nCC~
ry ~ntl That the n•pfor~u reclassification
~°~ desirable of sub'
comr~unity, the orderl ]ect property is
Y and proper development of the
4. '
properl That the proposed ~
close proximit}' to Subj c~nes and theira pe mitted nuses $ub~ect prcpertY does ~
generally established throughoute t e c mmunitye Zones and~their permbtteae uses
9 in5o Tha~ six persons indicated I
hearin FPosition;
to subject and that their presence at said
petition. no correspondence was public
received in oppositio^
ENVIRONM~NTAL '
Commi~sion ha~- IMPACT FINDING:
Rt•1-24U0 re°lewed the That the Anaheim
(Residential pLOpOSal to reclassif City Planning
MUltiple-Family) ' N141ti le-Family) Z~~e y subject propert ~
rectan Z°ne to construct tO the RA1-1200 Y from the
yularly-sh~ped a 6-unit (Residential
having a fronta parcel of land consisting of aaartment complex on a
9e of approxima;ely G6 feet on the east side g y ly ~'23 .
~Uq21r acre
ine SL•reet,
PC85-24
and further described as 326 South Vine ::treet; and does hereby approve the
iaegative Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments ceceived during the public review
process and further Ei.ndiny or. the basis of the initial study and any comments
received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEkEFOR6, 6t IT RESOLVED that the Anahe~^ City Planning
Commission does hercLy 9rant subject Petition for Recl~asification and, by so
doinn, that Title 18-ZOning of the Anaheim tlunicipal Code re amended to
exclude tlie above-desccibed property from the RM-2400 (Residential,
hlultiple-Family) ~one and to incorporate said desccibed property into the
RM-12QU IResidential, Multiple-Family) Zone upon t.he folZowiny conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of
subject propecty in order to preserve the safety and general welface of the
Citi2ens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That pcior to issuance of a building permit, appropciate park and
recreatior, in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council.
2. That prior to i.ssuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessin~nt fee sha21 be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for each new dwelling unit.
3. That drainaae of subject properr.y Gha.ll be dispo~~d of in a r~anner
satisfaccory to the City Engineer.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
5. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants
shall be installed and charged as requir~:d and determined to be
necessary by lhe Chief of the Fice Depa[tment.
6. That tra~h storage areas shall be nrovided and maintatnpd i~
accocdance with approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance
and Sanitation Division.
7. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from
view, and the sound buffered from adjacent propcrties.
8. That prior to issuance of buildiny permits, the applicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building inspector that
the residential units will be in confornance with Noise Insulation
Standards specified in the California Administrative Code, Title 25.
9. That p~ior to issuance oi b~~il~ing permits, the applicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Buildiny Inspector that
the proposed project is in conformance with Council Policy Number
542 "Sound Attenuation in Residential Projects•.
-2- PCdS-'t4
10. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a Feriod of
one year from the date of this ce~olution, whichever occurs first,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 8 and 9, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with. Extension~ for further time to complete said conditions may
be grarted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim
tlwiicipal Code.
il. That six (6) foot high concrete bloc:. wa~l: shall be constructed and
maintained on the north and south propecty lines.
12. That prior to final building and zor.ing inepections, Condition Nos.
3, 4, 6, 7 and 11, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
BE IT FUP.TFIER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commicsion
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applic~nt's compliance rrith each and a11 of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. S~ould any cuch condition, or any part thereof, be
declased invalid or une.forceable by the final judgment of arty court i~t
cou,retent jucisdiction, t~,~n this Resolution, and any apFrovals herein
contained, shall be deemed nu21 a~id void.
THc FOREGOING RESOLUTION :s signed and approvgd by me this 21st day
of January, 1985. ~ ;
~' / i -
/ i~ /
~-,-.i/ 'L-~^=7'-7`-:.-L.~r /7 ~ J .[.~
CI1„IRI•1AN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~
~
~~'~,~ .r~.~~
SECkETARY, ANAHLIFI C:TY PLANNING COF1cfISSION
STATE OF CALIFORN;A )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHF.7M ~
I. Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby cectify that the foregoing resolution wss passed and
adopted at a neeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January
31, 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST~ KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMDIISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY
ABSENT: COMMISSIOPlERS: NONE
IN WIiNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 21st day oL
January, 1985,
~ ~~ -~' =^ ~~ i~~~,~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM75SION
-3- PC85-24