PC 85-50RESOLUTION N0. PC85-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIhI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
T~AT PETITION FOR RECI.ASSIFICATION NO. 84-85-25 BE GRANTED
i
«~
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from LILLIAN BARNA, ET AL., 9104 Wimbledon
N• E., Albuquerque, New Mexico 87111, oa~ners, and J. R. DRURIN, 1280 East
Flower Street, Anaheim, California 92805, agent for certain real proper`y
situated in the City of A~~aheim, Counky of Orange, State of California,
desccibed as follow~:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF
THE SOUTHEAST QOARTER OF TNE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOW.NSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 NEST~ SAN DERNARDIDIO BASE AND
MEkIDIAN, 461.20 FEET WEST 0° THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
WEST ONE-HALF, AND RUNNING THENCE wEST A~ONG THE SGUTH LINE OF
SAID W~ST ONE-HALF, 74.05 FEET; THENCE idORTH PARALLEL TO THE
WEST LI1~E OF THE SAID WEST Ot7E-HALF, 591.36 FEET TO If POIP~T
ON THE SOUTEiERLY LIlIE OF THE RZGHT OF WAY OF THE P~,CIFIC
ELEC=RIC RAILROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG TFE SAID RIGH'f
OF tr'AY LINE 92,38 l~EET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLF.L TO TH£ WEST LINE
OF THE SAID WEST ONE-HALF 535.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did ho?d a public hearinq at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on February 2Q, 1985 at 1:30 p.m,,
notice of said public hEaring having been duly given as required by Iaw a~d in
a~:cordance witn tfe provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chaoter 1A.03,
to near ~ind consi~er evidence for and ageinst said proposed reclassifieation
and te investigate and make findings ar.d recommendations in connection
therewith;
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, invPStigation and
study ma~e by itself and in iCs hPt~11f, ,n~ aF~... .?;,~ ;;~t;~qdc:ut,on oL aIl
evidence and reports otfered at said hearing, does find and detecmine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property
from the RS-A-43,OOU (Residential, Agricultural) zone to the RM-2200
(Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property Eor
medium density cesidential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property to the
RM-1200 Zone is necessary and/~r desirable fcr the orderly and proper
development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zor,es and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity tc subject property and to the 2ones and th~ic permitted u~es
generally established throughout the community.
#0448r PC85-50
i;
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
inprovement of abut.ting streets in accocdance with the Circulation F.lemenl of
the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in trafEic which will be
generated by the inte~,sification of land use.
6. That orie person indicated their pre:ence at szid public hearing in
opposition; and tnat no cucrespondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMFACT PIN~ING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission Las reviewed lhe pcoposal to reclassify subject property from the
RS-A-43,000 iResidential, Agricultural) 2one to the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone to construct a 30-unit affordable apartment complex with
waiver~ oE ¶inimum building site area per dwelliny unit and maximum building
height on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of appcoximately O.d6
acre, having a ftontaye of app:oximately 74 feet on the rorth side of Ball Road,
and having a maximum depth of approximately 538 feet and being located
approximakely 1015 fe^t east of the centerline of Knott Street and further
described as 3033 West Ball Road; and does hereby approve the Ne~ative
Declaration upon finding that it has considered t:ie Negative Declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process and fucther
finding on the basis of the initial study and any commenr.s ceceived that there
is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on
Yhe environment.
NUh', THGREF~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subj~ct Petition foc Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-7oning cf the Anaheim Municipal Code be amerded to exclude
the above-described property from the RS-A-43,000 (F.,~s?dential, Agricultu:a2)
Zone ~nd to incorporate said de~cribed property into the RM-1200 (Residential,
f4ultiple-F~mity) Zone upon th~ fo:lowing conditic~s which are hereby found to be
a necessary prerequisite to Lhe pcoposed use of subject property in ord~er to
preserve the safety and genera.l Welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahcim:
1. That the owner of subject property sha_1 irrevocahly offer t~ ~a~i~~r~
~~ lne ~ity ot nnaheim a strip of lar.d 53 feet in width from the
centerline o£ the street along Ball Road for street aidening purposes.
2. That the ownec of subject property shall submit a letter requesting
termination of ReclassiFication No. 79-80-42, Variance No. 3156,
Conditioral Use Permil- No. 1337 and Tentative Tract No. 11079 to the
Planning Depactment.
3. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos.l and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed.
The provisions oc rights granted by this ,_solution shall become null
a~d void by actLon of the Planning Commission unless said conditions
are complied with Nithin one year from the date of this resolution, or
such further ti.me as the Planning Commission may grar.t.
~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commis,;ion does
! hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
' pcedicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
! hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, er any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment oE any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
-Z PC85-50
i.., .-
'~:::::-:'
_ ,~»,a~.~..~.:~....,.._......_ . . .
11
. ~`
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and aPProved by me this 20th day of
February, 1985. --
~~~ ~l; = ~~.v~~ - - ~~ -~ 'J L
CH}CIRMAN, RNAHEIM !IT PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ ~ 7~~~~ .
SECRE4•ARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN3 COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE } $S,
CITY OF ANP.hcIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission,
do hereby cectify that the foregoing r~soletion was passed and adopted at a
meetiiig of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 20, 1985, by
the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMZSSIONERS: HOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST~ [;ING, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS WHEREOG, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of
February, 1985.
' ~ n
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PI,ANNING COMDfISSION
-3-
PC85-50
r~.~~ti..<a""'" .