PC 85-53RESOLUTION N0. PC85-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C~MMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL UuE PERMIT N0. 2659 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a ve[ified
Pekition for Corditional Use Permit from POMONA TRUCK ELECTRIC, TNC., 3204
130th N. E., Bellevue, Washington 98005, ATTN: KURT GUEHR-PRESIDENT, owner,
AND LEONARD MORRIS, 4452 La Pa2 Circle, Yorba Linda, California 82686 ayent
for certain real property situated in the C?ty of Ananeim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as:
LOT 14 OF THE EUCALYPTUS FOREST TRACT~ AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN AOOK 5, PAGES 29 AND 30 OF MISCELI.ANEOUS MP.PS~
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did r,oia a p~blic hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on Febroary 20, 1985 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice oE said public hearing having been duly given as required by iaN and in
accordance with the pruvisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to heat and cor.sider evid:~ce for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
FiHERCAS, said Cot~~missiun, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and rF•ports offered at sai.d hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the orop~sed use is properly ~ne for which a conditional use
permit is au~horized by Anaheim Municipal CoZe Section 18.61.050.601 to wit:
to permit an automoGile anc~ truck repair facility with waiver of the following:
SECTIONS 18.06.050.0212 - Minimum nunber of oarkin spaces
19.DE.05~.4~~~. (EI ::p,icc~ ceyaiced: 43 ~Faces proposedl
18.06.080,
AND 18.61.066.050
Z. That the requested waiver is hereby granted on the basis that the
parking variance :+ill not cause an increase in traffic cong?stion in t'~e
immediate vici~ity nor adversely afiect any adjoining land uses; and tnat the
gra~ting of the parking variance under th~ conditions imposed, if any, will
not be detriment%al to the peace, health, safety or genetal welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the acea in which it is proposed
ko be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adeqnate to allcw the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peacn, health, safety and
general welfare ot the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
y0451t
PC85-53
y~!
,.-.
~:~.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions impused, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, healCh,
safety and genecal welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
G. That the tcaffic generated by the proposed uce will nol impose an
undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area.
7. That no one indicated their pcesence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was receive~ in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRONMF.tdTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City ~lanning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit an automobile and truck repair
facility witli a waiver of minimum number of parking spaces on a
cectangularly-sha~ed parcel of land consisting of approximately 132 feet on
the south side of Miraloma Avenue, having a maximum depth cf ap~roximately 285
feet and being located approximately 780 feet west of the center.line of Red
Gum Stceet, and furtlier described as 2880 East Miraloma Aven~e; and does
hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that it has considered
the tdegative Declacation t~gether with any com~rents received during the public
review pcocess and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significaat effect on the euvironment.
t~Ow, THERcFGRE, 6E 1'P RtsOLVEU that the Araheim City. Planning
Commission does hereby grant :ubject Petition foc Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following condi[ions which are hereby £ound to be a necessary prerequisite
to the pcoposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. Tt~at si::ewalks shall b~ installed along Miraloma Avenue as required
by the City Engineer and i~ accordance with standard plans and
specifications o~: file in the Office of the City Engineer.
-. T~~~'•: r:l~C .,.. ......::.Iii:~ ~;j u..uiiJif~y [~~CI(~i~~ Llle ~~~[V~IlaE~ ELdtY1C
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount a~ delecmined by the City Council for new commercial buildings.
3. That prior to issuance of a bu?lding permit, the owner of satject
property sh:.ll pay the appropriate drainage assessnent Fees to the
City of An~heim in an amount as determined by the City Engineer.
4. That the driveway shall be reconstructed to accommodate ten (10) foot
radius curb returns as required by the City ~raffic Engineer.
5. ;hat dcainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6. That subject property ~hall be served by underground utilities.
7. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants shall
be instal.led and charged ae required and dPtecmined to be necessary
by che ChieF of the Fire Department.
S
';~ 'Z' FC85-53
~5
- i
~i
~4~ - c
- ~
8. That trash st•orage areas shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with approved plans on file ~ith the Street Maintenance
and Sanitation Division.
9. That fire sprinklers sha11 be installed as required by the City °ire
Marshall..
10. 4'hat the existing most easterly driveway on Miraloma Avenue shall be
removed and replaced with a standard curb, gutter, sidewalk and
landscaping.
11. That gates shall not be installed across ~ny drivew~y in a manner
which may adversely affect vehicular trafric in the adjacent public
streets. Installation of any gates within a di.stance of fortp (40)
feet from said public street rights-of-way shall be subject to the
review and approval of the City Traffic E~gineer.
12. That all lockable vehicular access gates shall be equipped with a
"knox box° device to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police and the
City Fire t4arshall.
13. That al~ air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground
mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view.
14. That che proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of the
bIL Zofie, unless a variance allowing si~n waivers is approved by the
Planning Commission or City Council.
15. That there shall be no outdoor storage of or wock on vehicles or
vehiculeir parts.
16, That prior to issuance of a building permit, the owner of subject
property shall post a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit,
or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
guaranteeing the removal of the existing building iocated on the
northerly portion of subject property within 60 (sixty) days
following i.ssuance of the certifica+~e of occupancy for t:~e proposed
building.
17. •Phat ttie owner of subject property shall submit a letter requesting
termination of Conditional Ose Permit No. 2050 to the Planning
Department.
18. That subject property shall be developed subst~ntially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
19. That prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resolution, or prior to issuance of a buildi.ng permit, or within a
period of one year from the date oE this resolution, whichever occurs
first, Condition Nos. 2, 3, 16 and 17, above-mentioned, shall be
comp2ied with. Extensions for further time to complete said
conditians may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the
Anaheim Municfpal Code.
-3- PC85-53
I
. _ ~.
- __
20. That prior to the commencement of the activ±ty authorized under this
resolution, or final building and zoning insp~ctions whichever occurs
PiLSt, Condition NUS. .l, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 18
above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
AE IT EORTHER RESOL'vc^A that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine L'nat adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolutio~, a~d any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FUREGOING P.ESOLUTION is signed an~7 apptoved by me this 20th day
of February, 1985. % ~.~
/' ~
~~, / ,%~ t.-~ ~ ~ /.~
CHAI. AN~ ANAHEIM CI Y LANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
v /~ ~ XJf%Ai(~
SECRETARY, AN)1HEIM CITY LANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) gg,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Commission, doa hereby certify ~thatethedrforegoingh resolution iast pa sed nand
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February
20, 1985, by the following vate of the members thereof:
AYGS: COMMISSIONGRS: BOUAS, FRY~ HERBST, KING, MC BURNEY
NOES: CUT:MISP.ivlr'iBS: BUSHUHt:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 7,A CLAIRE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of
February, 1985.
~ ~ ~^
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PCE5-53 ~