PC 85-56RESOLUTION N0. PC85^56
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI~N
THAT PETITION E'OR VARIANCE N0. 3460 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Pe~ition fo[ Variance from AMVETS DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNZA SERVICE FOUNDATION,
1213 South Aale Avenue, Anaheim, Californ.ia 92804, ATTN: ED W. BRANUM, owner
of. certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California described as:
THE EAST 195 FEF.T OF THE NORTH 253 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF
THE NORTHEAST QUAR:BR OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24~
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES~ AS
SAID SECTION IS SHOWN QN A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 51
PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, ZN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
F.XCEPT iHE NORT.'1 193 FEET THEREOE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of AnahEim on February 20, 1985, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearin~l having bee.^. duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chaptec 18.03,
to hear and con°ider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Cort~mission, a.:ter due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to retain
a painted wall sign:
SECTIOt7 18.05.093.045 - Maximum area of wall sign.
(247 sq ft permitted on north building wall;
1236 square feet existing).
2. That the above-mentioned waivec is hereby 9canted on th2 basis
that there are special circumstanc?s applicable to the property such as size,
shape, topography, locat:on and surcoundings which do not apply to other
identically zoned property in the same vicinity; and that strict application
of the ~oning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other
properties in the identical zone and classification in the vicinity.
3, ihat the vaciance is hereby granted for a peciod of ten (10)
years to expire on February 20, 1995.
4. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to tte property involved cr to the intended use of the
propecty that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
9~ ~0454r PC85-56
~:,i .
~
5• That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right- possessed by other pcoperty in the
same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
6• That thc requested variance will not be materially detcimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
~• Thac no one indicated their presence at said public hearinq in
opposition; and that no correspondence wa: received in upposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONM:NTAL IMPACT FINDZNG: The Planning Director oc his
authorized representative has determined that the ro osed
within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11 as eEinedt inathe
State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to prepare an E1R.
NOW, THEkEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, uport the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisits to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preservE the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specitications un Eile with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3.
2. That Condition No, 1, above-mentioned, shall be completed within a
period of ninety (90) day~ from the date of this resolution.
3. That this variance snall expire on February 20, 1995.
BE IT b~URTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressiy
predicated upon applicant's comPZt~r.ce e.~ili~ eacn and all of the conditions
i~ereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part theteof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 20th day
of February, 1985,
~ ~ ~ `
/ ~ 1 /
~r-ll~ Y'~ lr~ //~/~i
CHAIRMAN, AIrAH I CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
, ~~.~~-~ .~' -~~<~-7
~ECRETARY~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COM-IpN
-2-
PCII5-56
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ~~.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ?
I, E~ith L. Hacris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannir.~
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed a,~d
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Februr~r~
20, 1385, by the followinq vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERBST~ KING~ MC B~3RNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS WHER~OF, I hav~ hereunto set my hand this 20th day of
Febriiary, 1985.
<~ - ~
/ ~~~ ~ ~ ~
(J Gtl~~c'' l.l .r .~ i-
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PL N ING COMMISSZON
-3- PCA5-56 ~~
,,