PC 85-69RESOLUTION NO. PC85-69
A RCSOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CIT't PLAtJNING COMMISSION
THAT PETIiION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMiT N0. 2664 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
P°tition for Conditional Use Permit from BURTON ZOUL, P. 0. Box 1529,
Fallbrook, CA 92028, owner, and RICHARD SELEIhE, P. O. Box 556, Silverado, CA
92676, agent foc certain real propec~y situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 26 OF ANAHEIM EXTEPISION, AS SHOWN Otd A MAP
OF SURVEY MADE BY WILLIAM HAMEL AND FILED ZN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF ~OS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~ A COPY OF
WHiCH IS SHOWN IN d00K 3~ PAGE 163 ET SEQ. ENTITLED 'LOS
ANGi.LES COUNTY MAPS' IN THE OFPICE OF THE COUNTY P.ECORDER OF
ORANGE COUNTY~ CALIFORNIA~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLO'r7S:
BEC,INNING AT THE CENTERLINE ZNTERSECTION OP BALL ROAD AND LOS
ANGELES STREET; TF3ENCE NORTH 15° 32' 15' WEST 213.19 FCET
A;.ONG THE SAID CENTERLINE OF LOS ANGELES STREET TO THE LINE
PARAi!,EL WZTH AND SOUTHEftLY 290.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF THE LANll DESCRIBED IN DEED TO R. L. KEITH A[~D WIFE~
RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1946 IN BOOK 1456, PAGE 555 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS: THENCE SOUTH 7+° 20' 15' WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID
NORTyF.RLY LINE TO A LZNE PARALLEL WITH AND 200.00 FEET
WESTERLY FROM SAID CENTERLINE OF LOS ANGELES S7REET; THENCE
SOUTH 15° 32' 15' EAST 157.52 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID LOS
ANGELES S'PP.EET CENTERLINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID BALL ROAD;
THENCE NORTH 89° `_5' 15' EAST 207.51 FEET ?'0 THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, th~ City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center ir, tt~e City of Anaheim on March 4, 1985 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public heariny having been dulx given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
r_o hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in conneckion
thereHith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and ir. its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offeced at said hearing, does find and detecmine the
following facts:
1. That the pr.opo~ed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 16.0"s.030.~10 to
wit: to permit a conven.ience market with gasoline sales and off-sale beer and
wine.
2. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the yrowth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be
located.
$0464r PC85-69
3. That khe size and shape of the site pcoposed for tlie use is not
adequate ~o allow the full development of the proposed use in a manr.ec not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will be detrimental to the pc-ace, health, safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5, That the traffic g~nerated by the proposed use will impose qn
undue burden upon the etree~s and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area.
6. That no o~e indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FZNDING: That the Anaheim CiEy Planninq
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit a convcnience market with
gasoline sales and off-sale beer and wine on an irregula:•ly-shaped parcel of
land consisting of approximate:y 0.43 acre located at the northwest corner of
Ball Road and Anaheim Boulevard, and further described as 101 Wast Ba]i Road
(7-11 Food Stor.e); and does hereby approve the Negative Declarat?on upon
finding that it t~as considered the Negative Declaration together with any
comments reccived duri.ng the puulic review process a~d further finding on the
bas!s of the init.ial study and any comments received that there is no
substantial ev?dence that the project will have a significant effect on the
envirunment.
NOW, THER;3FORE, BE I': RESOLVED thal the Anaheim Citl Planning
Commission does hoc•eb}~ deny subjec:t P~tition for Coriditional Use Permit, on
the Dasis of the af~~rementioned finjings.
THE FOREGOTNG R~SOLUTION ia signed and approved by me this 4th day of
M.~rchr 19R5.
~i,^ i %~; .-h . !•'.~~i~
CHAIRWOMAN~ PRO TEMPORE ~_
ANAHEIM ClTY PLANNING COMMISSZON
ATTEST:
~~p t'`"~ ~ ' Ct~t.~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIPi CITY PLAN[~ING COMMISSION
-Z-
PC85-69
'`"~
~r.
STATE OF CALIFORNZA )
COUNTY OF ORANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Hacris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do he[eby ce~tify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
ado~ted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on March 4,
19a5, by the following vote of the members the~eof:
AYES: COMMISSIUNERS: BOUAS, BUSHOkE~ FRY, KING, LA CLAIRF.~ MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABS:NT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thi~ 4':h Aay of
March, 1985. ~ _
~A ~-~ ,~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CZTY PLANNZNG COMMISSION
!' ! #0464r
R~"~
~r
.„ ~
~
(. i-~.-0t ~1.. ~ ' •. . ...
rc85-69
.'.S
-... . ...~~