Loading...
PC 85-97~ RESULUTIpN N0. PC85-9% A P.ESOLUTIOAI OF Tf1F Af7A(IgZp~ ~ITy pr,ANNlNG COMMSSSION THAT PETITIOtJ FOR VARIANCE N0. 3474 BE GRAMTED, IN PART w~~~R~~`°'~ tr~ Anahei.m City Planning Commission did Petition for Jacience Yrom VINCENT P, pE2TROK, Zlg ~ Anaheim, California 92805 Leceive a verified Lrive , owner, ancl HUCO p, West Vermont Avenue, . , Anaheim, California 9zgp5~ VAZQUEZ, 619 South Live Oak the City of Anaheim, Count a9ent for cectain real Y of Orange, State of California describedsasuated in PARCEL 1: THE WESTERLY 110 FEET OF THAT PORTZON OF LOT ;'.' EXTENSION, IN THL•' COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE 27~ ANAHEIM SHOWN ON A MAP OF SURVEY MADE BY WILLIAM HA EL AINFOg68AAND FIL£D IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDCR OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~ DESCRIBED ~S FOLLOW$; BEGINNING POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT THE CENTER LINE OF VERt90NT AVENUE f AT A ~ FORFfERLYABROADISTREET)GAND ~ DzSTANT EASTERLY~ MEASORED ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 762.09 FEET FFt06] THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE ON VERMONT AVENUE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF PAL~d STREET, ._pID pOINT OF P,~GItdNING ~GING THG NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF T!~E LAND DESCRIg~p CERTIFICATE OF TITLE N0. 7155; THF.NCE SOUTHERLY . EASTERLY LINE IN OF TFIE LAND DESCRIBEp IN ALONG THE TITLE AND ALONG THE [1UST EASTERLY SAID CERTIFICATE OF TRACT DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO.T6539 TOOp3 IN TF1E ,g ACRE OUTH L•INE pF gp*p LOT 27 IN THE CENTER LINE POINT ROAD, WHICH SAID POINT _TS DIS'1'AN~ ETST 775,$5 FEET INTERSECTION OF ~r BnLL THE r,ENTER LINES OF PALM STR~;E~ FROtg THE ROAD; THENCE EAST ALOtv~ THE CENTER LINE OF BALL ROADN TO BTHE SOU7'HEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 27; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALOI6G THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT IN THE CENTER LINE OF VERMONT AVENUE AND THP:MCF SUUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENmg4 r,It~~ 1~ 1HE FOINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEpT THEREFROM Tf1AT PORTION THEREOF INCI,UDEL WI7'HtIJ ~'~p,MpNT AVENUE, RLSn EXCEPTING THERRFROM mHAT PART TfIEREOP LYI',JG SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DRAWN r,i,~:EPI.Y ACROSS SAID LAND PARALLEL WITH NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 27 FHU'ri ;, PO?NT NORTH 2g~ i 1936 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF. THE 24 WEST WHEREAS, the City planning Commission did hold a the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 1 of said Public hearing at public hearing having been dul ~ 1985, ~t 1;30 accordance with the Y 9iven as required b P~m~' nOtice to hear and Provisions of the P.naheim t9unicipal Code y laW and in consider ev±dence for and against said ~ ~hapter 1g,03, investigal•e and make fiudings and recomuieuubi.;,,;;,, pn °posed variance and tp said public hearing having been continued to ~ nnection therewith; of Apr.il ].5, 19g5; ar,d the Plannin 9 Commission meEting #0496r PC85-97 ~,m .. _ . .. . . ~ _ . ~-., WHEREA3, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and aftec due consideration of a11 evidence and reporl•s of£ered at said hearing, does find and determine the Following facts: a 14-unit apartment comp lexitioner proposes waivecs of the following to construct (a) SECTION 18.34.061.010 •- Minimum buildin site area urFit, er dwellin (bJ SECTION I8.39.062.011 - Maximum structural hei ht. AND .18.34.OG2.p12 (1 stor within 150 feet of a sin le- residential zone and 2 stoties ot~W1Sel per~nitted; 2 stories at 52 fee~ and-et Erom a sin le-famil residentiai ~~_ne boundarY to the west and north and 3 at 52 and 104 feet from a sin 1_e-familv ries residentiel zone boundar to the r;es~ana north proposed) Z• ihat the above-mentioned waiver (a) is hereby denied on the basis bhat revised planc submitt~f by the petitioner deleted the need for said waiver y reducing the number pro osed complyiny with the Code standard for residential den ity from 1G to 14, thereby 3• That the above-nentioned waiver (b) is hereby granted on the basis that there are special circumstances applicable to the properEy such as size, shape, topography, location and surroundings which do not apply to other identica2ly yoned property in the same vicinity; and that strict application ef tne Zoning Code depcives the property ag privileges enjoyed by other in the identical zone and classification in the vicinity. properties 4• That there are exceptional or e;~traordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the Pcoperty that do not apply gEnerally to the property or class of use in the same vicinit}• and zone. 5' T~'''~ '-~~ ~CyucsLeu ~~ariance is necessary for the enjoyment of a sul~stantial property right possessed b Preservation and vicinity and zone, and denied to the property i^ Y°ther property in the question. same 6• That the requeated cariance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the ~roperty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the ,nroperty is located. ~• Thar no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that nc corcespondence was received in opposition to subject petition. ENVIRUNMENTAL Ip1PACT PItIDING: That the anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the with waivers of minimum bu Ld ng a site a eatruct a 14-unit apartment complex structural height on a rectangularly-sha ed per dwelling unit and approximately O.y acre, havin p parcel of land consistingimof ~i~n g a frontage of approximately 110 feet on the south of Vermont Avenue, and furtlier described as 21E west Vermont Avenue; and -z- PC85-97 3':y.i, . . . . ~~...~~.: ~ ': a does hereby approve the Neyative Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments [eceived during the public review process and further finding ~n the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that *_he project will have a signiEicant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ZT RESGLVED that the Anaheim City planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for ~Jariance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prer.equisite to the proposed use of the subject propezty in order to preserve the safety and yeneral welfare of the Citizens of the City oE Anaheim: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City op pnaheim a fee for tree planting purposes along Vermont Street irt an amount as determined by the City Council. 2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council. 3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amouret zs determined by the City Councii for each new dwelling unit. 4. That sidewalks shall be installed along Vermont Avenue as tequired by the City Engineer and in accordance with standara plans and specifications on file in the Office of the CiCy Engineec. 5. That the driveway shall be constructed to accommodate ten (10) foot radius curb returns as required by the Cit_y Traffic Engineer. 6. That drainage oE subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities, 8. That prior tu commencement of structura7 f:aming, fire hydiants shall Le installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 9. That trash storage aceas shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation Division. lU. That the proposed parking structure design shall conform to Engyneering ~ Standard Plan No. 902 pertaining to standard details Lot parking structures and ramp requirements. 1:. That street lightir:g facilities along Vermont Avenue shall be ynstalled as required by the Utilities General Manager in accordarice w:th specifications on file in the OfEice of Utilities General Manager, and that security in the Eorm of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and Eorm satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the abo~~e-mentioned improvements. Said secur.ity shall be posted with the City of Anaheim prior to issuance of building permits. The above-required improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy. "S -3- PC85-97 ~~,~ _ . 12. That fire sprinklers shall be installed as required by the City Fire t4arshall. 13. That gates shal.l not be installed across the driveway in a mann~ar which may adversely affect vehicular traffic in the adjacent public stxeet. Installation of any gates with.in a distance of forty (40) feet from said public street righ,t-of-way shall be subject to the review and approval oE the City Traffic Engineer. 14. That all lockable pedestrian and vehicular access gates shall be equipped with a"I:nox box" device to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police and the City Fice Marshall. 15. ~Phat prior to final street inspect:ons, "No parking for street sweeping" signs shall be installed as required by the Street t9aintenance and Sanitation Division and in accordance with specifications on file with said division. 16. That all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent residential properties. 17. That subject property shall bz deve~oped substantially in accordance mith plans and specifications or. file with the City of Anaheim marked Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4. lb. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 10 and 11, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be 9t'anted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 19. That prior to final building and zonir,g inspections, rondition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, .12, 13, 14, 16 and 17, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the AnaFeim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any sur.h condition, or any part thereuf, be declared invalid ur unenforceab2e by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null ano void. THE EOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and app[oved by me this 15th day of April, 1985. ` ' / ~ -`, ~ ~~ ~ .._. . '~!~%i ~~ ,/ \//~ CHAIRMAN, ANAHEI~t CI1Y PLANNING COMMISSION "~;; ATTEST: ~ > Y~~t~, ~ %~~% ~~: `e SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CZTY PLANNING COMMISSION '~ -4- PC85-97 ti`, a~: i' ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUN4'Y OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF' ANAHEIFI ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary oE the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on April 15, 1985, by the following vote of the members Y.hereof: AYES: CUMMISSIONERS: HOUAS~ FRY~ HERBST, K?NG, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY NOES: COM1IMISSIONERS: BUSHORE ABSENi: COMMISSIO[JERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~Sth day of April, 1985. . ^ ~n ~ ~. SECkETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -5- 0 PC85-97