PC 86-115,..._. _ ..... .... ....... .... .,._.......
•
\
,.
,-.,
; ~
_ ~:~
~
t.
r
RGSOLUTION N0. PC86-.115 F
r ~
A RESOLUTIQN OF THE ANAHEIM GITY PLANNING i.t~MF1:[SSION ~
THA`P PETITION k'OR CONDITIONAL US~ PERM:IT N0. 2791 BE GRANTED
WH~REAS, the Anaheim ~ity Planning Commission did re~eive a verifiecl i
;
Petition far Condilional Use Permit from PGV't'ECH TNC~, liil.'. FairEard Driva, '
Ca.liEorni.a 92633, owner and ANTOI~'INO F. 7~'RIOLO, 508 Ae~ich
F'~tlle~ton
,
Bu~levard, Anahcim, Califocnia 92804, agent for certair, real properi:y si~ttake9
in the City of Ananei.m, County of Orange, State of Ca1iL-ornia, descri}~ed as:
Tf3E WLST 330 I'L'L"r OF THE SOUTH 3~6 FI;GT OF THT' SOUTHWEST QUART~R
OF THE 50UTI-IVdEST QUARTEFt OF THE NORTHWES'~ QUA~2`tER OI' SECTION i3,
TOWNSEIIP 4, SC)UTH, RANG;, 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO I~OS COYUTES~ AS
SHOP~N ON A MAP RGCQRDED IN F30CE~ 51, PAGE 1'_ OF MISCELLANEOUS
MAPS, IZFC'URllS qF ~RANGE COUNTY, CALI~ORt~IAe
EXCEPTIPdG THEkEFRO[~1 THE SOUT[i 17a FEG'P OF THL WE5T 227 ~'EFT.
ALSO LXCEI''.CI:VG T[iEf2E1RUM THE WEST 92 ~EET~
PAI2(:1;L 2:
`rHE~ SOUTH 175 hEET GF TH[3 WEST 227 F('ET OF '3'HL SOUTHR'r5T QUARTGR
OE' `.CHE SOUTl1WEST QUAf2TER Ok ',^.H~ NO~2THWEST QUARTEI2 Oe SEC'rIU[3 13 ~
Ti7 'PUWNSHTP 9 SOUTH, RANC;E 11 WiST, RANCHO LOS CC~YOTES, Aa SHOWId
ON A MAP `.CHEREOL' RECORUED I N BGOK 51 , ~ AG~ 7, ET ~EQ. ,
MISCELL~ANF(`US MAPS, RECORDS OF OFcANGF COUNTY.
WHP:RLAS, the Cit,~ P.lanning Commission dic~ hold a 1~u~iJ.ic hearir-g at
the Civic Cenl,er. in the ~ity of. Anaheim on A~ri.l 28, 1986, at 1;30 p.m.,
notice at said pub'lic hearing having bnen duly given as required by law ~nd in _
accord~nce with the provisions of tF,e Anahaim iMUt?icioal Code, Chapter 18.03,
ko hear and consider evid~:~..:e for. and against said proposed conditional use
permik and to inv~stiaate ~,nd make fi.n~ittgs and recommendations ir. conriection
th~rewith; and
WH~REAS, ~aid Commi.ssion, after du~ inspection, investiga~ion and
study mad~ by it~elf and in iLS hehalf, and aftPr dtze co~isi.deratiun of all ;;
evi_dence and repnr.t: ~.f~ered ~t said h•~ar.ing, do~s Fir-d ~.nd cietermine the ,~;1
fol.low.i~~g ~act~: ;~j
`
1. That the proposed use is proper.l}~ one for which a conditional use .; ~
~
permit is aut:hori~ed b:~ Anaheim Munici~41 Code SECti~n 18.~4.05~.016 to wit: ~i
~
to permit on-sale becr and wine in a propased restaurant with waiver ot: ~~,'
y
-'
a
SF,C'.CIONS 18.U6.050.0232 - Minimum number oP parking s~ces.
].3.06.080 !138 spaces required; .114 ~aces propo~ed)
AtJD 1~.44.fJ66.050
"1.. TY~at i:he abave-~reqtte ~ted waiver i.s h~~zeby gr.anl~d on the basis
tt,at the ~arking waiver will ~ot cause an increase in traffic co~yestion in +
the i.rmnediate vicini.cy nor a6versely aftect any ad;joining land uses and
granting of thP parking waiver under thE cunditions imposed, if any, will not i,
be detrimental ~o the aeace, health. sa[ety and g~neral welPare o£ thE ;"
'
citizens ot the Cit.y of Anaheim.
,~,.
"
~;,',
PC~6-~115 .
079nr
^:
. ~~J
~
>„~
'~ , "'~
•i
•~
, "~
~
t,
}
3. That
the pr.oposed use wi.ll ~ok
adversely affect th `~
c adjoininq '~~'
lanc~ uses and the growth and developm~nt c~t- t he area in whicn it is ~~roposed ~~
to be ].oca~ed.
4. mhat
rhe size and shape of the
site prapa,~ed For `„
the use .is
adequate +;.o al]ow the full development of th t proposed use in a mannei not
; detrimental to ~h e parEicular area nar to the ~eace, health, safety and
:,• yeneral welfare of L-he Citizens of the Cit~~ of A~iaheim.
5. That the grantina c;f the Conditional UsP PermiL- under the
con~itions impo~ed, if any, will not Ue deL-ri.menLal to the pe~ce, health,
saf~ty and aeneral welf.are of L-t~e Citizens oF the City oi Anaheim.
,i 6. That Lhe traEfic generated by th~ proposed use will not im~ose an
~~~ ur.due burden upon tne streets anQ hiqhways dc~siyned and improved to carry L•he
;; traff.ic in ~h~ axeu.
Ji
7. `Phat
:zo
o1~e indicated thEir
presence at said puUJ ic hearing in
:S Upposition; anU that no c:~rrespondence was received in o~~position to the
~,i subject petition.
ENVIP~NMLNTA:~ IP?PACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commissi~n has r.ev.iewed the pcoposal to permit on--sale beer a-~d wine in ~~
propased restauraril- wikPi waiver af. minimu~n number of_ parking apaces on a
~ectan~ularly-tihaped parcPl, r,f land consist.i.ng of appr.oxim«tely 1.91 acr~as
lacated at the northeast: corn~r of Ur~~nge Avenue and tieach ~oulevard, and
Eurth~:c describEd as 508 South ~3each Boulevard; and do~s her.eby approve the
Negative Declarak.ion upon fi.ndiny l:hac it has considered l•he Negative
Declarak:ian I.ogether wil:h any comments received duriny the pubZic review
procESS aiir3 fur.ther fir,ding on the basi.s uf the :initia~ stucly ~nd any comments
received that there is no substanti.al evid~nce that the project wi11 have a
siqnifical:. effect on che environment.
NOW, THf'ttEFURI;, F3E IT RE50LVEll tha~. th~ Anaheim Cit.x Plarrning
C.omtnis~ian does heceby yranL- sub~ect Petition for. Conditional C~se .Permit, upon
the £ollowing conditions whir.h ar~ hereby L-ound L•o he a necc~ssary prerequ:isite
to the propose~l use of the subject property in urder L-~ preserve the saf~ty
~nd gEnera.l welfare of the Ci~irens of the City o~ Ananeim:
1. ~Phat prior to issuanae of a buildiny perm.lt, prim~ry water main fee~
shall be paid ~o L-he CiCy ot Anahein~, in an amount as determined by
the O.ffice of the Utili~ies General Manager.
2. 'Phat pri.or to issuance of. a k~uilding per.mit, the ap.r_copriate ~caffic
.;ignal assessmei~t Eee shall b~ paid to the Cil•y o`: An~he~m in an
amount as determined by t~:e ~'i.ty C~unci.l for n~w commercial.
3, That a11 driveways Shall ne constructed h_o accommodate ten (:~0) foot
eadius curL retucns as required by the City Traff.ic F'ngineer.
4. 'I'hat tlie existing most easterly drive~uay on Orange Avenue shall be
re~roved and replaced with a stan~ard curb, gutter, sidewalk and
landscapin~.
-2-
~';"a
; ~~.
' ~;.
`:':<.
; ;:
.:.~ ~ ~
PC86-115 `''~
':~~
A~
. . .... . _!.~~:~,!l~.'1
,~~~.
5. The~t subject property :,ha11 be develot~ed :;u~~tanti.ally in accordai~ce
with pl~ns and s~trif~cat:ion;, r,n tile wic.h thr: (:ity af Anari~ir~ markEd
I;xhibLt Nas. 1 a-td 2.
E. Ttiat pr.ior L•o Ci.na1 bui.ldiny ancl zon.ing .in.~pec~ions, Cvnc~ition N~~s. 3
cjnd 4, abovc~-mentioned, t,h<all be cumolied with.
7• 'Phat no alcohr~lic be:ver.age,, c~xcef~t beer and wiri~~ shall be so.ld o[
h., c~~nsumed on the f~remiUes oF the subjec;t condikional usE~ permit.
F3E; T~1~ FURTHF.R RfJSO4VI;D th~~t tt~e An~hei.m i:ity P;.anning Commi~sion does
h~reby f inc9 and detc~rm.ir~e thaC acloE~tion of khis ~esolution i~ exptessly
~rcdicated uP~n ar,plicant's compliance wi.th each and all o~ the condltions
hercinabove set gorth. Should any such conditions, or ar~y ~art therepf., be
declared invalid or anenfo~-~,eable bl ~he f.in~~7. judyment of any eourt oF
: compete7~ jurisdiction, then this Reyoluk.ion, ~and ~.ny approva.la hex'ein
r_ontain<:d, sha11 be deemed null ~and void.
TflF Fi~HEGOTNG RESC~LU'PION i^ signeca ano apprpved by ma this 'lath ciay
of April, 19f3G.
~ ~~~~=~~t-L~:-~~~~ t~`~~c?l, ( ( d.~,~ _~-~'
CHATRIdQMAN, ANAEf[:IM C1TY YL~ANPIING CUi~:MTS IS pH
A'i"1 FJ S 7.' :
~.' ~ t~ -' /,~
-- .,m-~-~~{~~~- < ~ t'~~ ,~,~ ~
5~~-c~~• ":.t? ~; ANAH!;TM C!'.1'Y PLAP~NING COMM~ IU~J
S'_A'1'Fa U[' CALlEORNIA )
COf1N'I'Y Oi~ iJRANGF ) :; , .
CITY UF AN',yi:IM )
I, ~dir.h L. li5r.ri.s, Secret:ar~~ oP the Anahei~n City Planning
Commi.~sion, do tiereb,y certi_Ey r_har. the foregoin~ r.~~solution was pas~~d and
a~»P~~'~j a~ ~ me!~tinq oE r,hr~ Anaheim City Planning Commi ~ston I~eld r~n Apr.tl 2$,
I9ah, b.y the f.:? lowin~J ~•oL•~ ox r_he members r.her~~oE •
'~~ ~Y~S: CO"1(9ISSIONH.itS: I~OiJAS, HG•'f2B5T, LA (:LAIR[:,.L',WICK7, i~C F3URNF,Y, MCSSE
'? t~OE5; ~:ODIM.ISSI~[dERS: idUNF:
'1 A3SEN'P: COI9MIiS1UiJERS: FR'f
IN WII'N'r.'SS WHI•,'RI:O[~, I h~]V~ h~reunL-r~ ~eL- my 'r,an~3 thic 28th day of
Agril, 1986.
_~~~`.~ ~~ ~' .
S;iCI:F:'fARY, AP;ANEIM C-'1'Y PI,AN,•IINC CUMM15SI4t3
~~
_ 3 ..
.
YC86-115